Palmisano Stephen, Arcioni Benjamin, Stapley Paul J
School of Psychology, University of Wollongong, Wollongong, NSW, 2522, Australia.
Illawarra Health and Medical Research Institute, Wollongong, Australia.
Exp Brain Res. 2018 Jan;236(1):315-329. doi: 10.1007/s00221-017-5130-1. Epub 2017 Nov 27.
Evidence is mounting that differences in postural instability can be used to predict who will experience strong illusory self-motions (vection) and become sick when exposed to global patterns of optical flow (e.g., Apthorp et al., PLoS One 9(12):e113897, 2014; Stoffregen and Smart, Brain Res Bull 47:437-448, 1998). This study compared the predictive ability of traditional and recurrence quantification analysis (RQA) based measures of postural activity. We initially measured spontaneous fluctuations in the centre of foot pressure (CoP) of our subjects as they stood quietly with their eyes open and closed. They were then repeatedly exposed to two different types of self-motion display. As expected, the oscillating self-motion displays were found to induce stronger vection and greater sickness than the smooth self-motion displays. RQA based measures of spontaneous postural activity proved to be superior predictors of both vection strength and visually induced motion sickness (VIMS). Participants who had displayed lower CoP recurrence rates when standing quietly were more likely to later report stronger vection and VIMS when exposed to both types of optical flow. Vection strength (but not VIMS) was also found to correlate significantly with three other RQA based measures of postural activity (determinism, entropy, and average diagonal line length). We propose that these RQA based measures of spontaneous postural activity could serve as useful diagnostic tools for evaluating who will benefit the most/least from exposure to virtual environments.
越来越多的证据表明,姿势稳定性的差异可用于预测谁会经历强烈的虚幻自我运动(动感),并在暴露于整体光流模式时感到不适(例如,Apthorp等人,《公共科学图书馆·综合》9(12):e113897,2014;Stoffregen和Smart,《脑研究通报》47:437 - 448,1998)。本研究比较了基于传统方法和递归量化分析(RQA)的姿势活动测量方法的预测能力。我们首先测量了受试者在睁眼和闭眼安静站立时足底压力中心(CoP)的自发波动。然后,他们反复接触两种不同类型的自我运动显示。正如预期的那样,与平稳的自我运动显示相比,振荡的自我运动显示会诱发更强的动感和更强烈的不适。基于RQA的自发姿势活动测量方法被证明是动感强度和视觉诱发晕动病(VIMS)的更好预测指标。在安静站立时CoP复发率较低的参与者,在接触两种光流时,后来更有可能报告更强的动感和VIMS。还发现动感强度(但不是VIMS)与基于RQA的其他三种姿势活动测量指标(确定性、熵和平均对角线长度)显著相关。我们建议,这些基于RQA的自发姿势活动测量方法可作为有用的诊断工具,用于评估谁将从接触虚拟环境中受益最大/最小。