Faculty of Dentistry, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Thailand.
Department of Prosthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Thailand.
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2018 Apr;20(2):160-169. doi: 10.1111/cid.12562. Epub 2017 Nov 27.
Improvements of soft tissue to the abutment surface results in more stable peri-implant conditions, however, few human histological studies have compared soft tissue responses around different abutment materials.
To describe the peri-implant tissue around 3 abutment materials; titanium, zirconia, and gold alloy, over an 8-week healing period.
Fifteen edentulous sites were treated with implants. Eight weeks later, peri-implant tissue was harvested and processed using a nonseparation resin embedded technique. The tissue attachment characteristics were assessed at clinical stages using the gingival index (GI) score, surgical stage (surgical score), and histological stage (histological attachment percentage). Additionally, the inflammatory responses were evaluated using inflammatory extent and inflammatory cellularity grades. Nonparametrical statistics were used to describe the GI and surgical scores, and analytical statistics were used to analyze the histological attachment percentages as well as the inflammatory extent and cellularity grades amongst the 3 groups.
There were no statistically significant differences among the groups for GI score (P = .071) and surgical score (P = .262). Titanium and zirconia exhibited nearly similar mean histological attachment percentages while gold alloy had a significantly lower percentage (P = .004). For the inflammatory extent and cellularity grades, the odds of being one grade higher for gold alloy abutment was 5.18 and 17.8 times that of titanium abutment, respectively. However, for the zirconia abutment, the odds were 0.87 and 7.5 times higher than the titanium group.
The tissue around the gold alloy abutments resulted in worse attachment conditions compared with the titanium and zirconia abutments. Inflammation tended to be higher in the tissue around the gold alloy abutments than the titanium and zirconia abutments.
改善基台表面的软组织会导致更稳定的种植体周围状况,然而,很少有人体组织学研究比较过不同基台材料周围的软组织反应。
描述钛、氧化锆和金合金三种不同基台材料在 8 周愈合期周围的种植体周围组织。
15 个无牙部位接受种植体治疗。8 周后,采集种植体周围组织并使用非分离树脂包埋技术进行处理。在临床阶段使用牙龈指数(GI)评分、手术阶段(手术评分)和组织学阶段(组织学附着百分比)评估组织附着特征。此外,还使用炎症程度和炎症细胞分级评估炎症反应。使用非参数统计描述 GI 和手术评分,并使用分析统计分析 3 组之间的组织学附着百分比以及炎症程度和细胞分级。
GI 评分(P=0.071)和手术评分(P=0.262)在三组之间无统计学差异。钛和氧化锆的组织学附着百分比平均值相近,而金合金的附着百分比明显较低(P=0.004)。对于炎症程度和细胞分级,金合金基台的炎症程度和细胞分级高一级的可能性分别是钛基台的 5.18 倍和 17.8 倍。然而,对于氧化锆基台,其可能性分别是钛基台的 0.87 倍和 7.5 倍。
与钛和氧化锆基台相比,金合金基台周围的组织附着条件较差。金合金基台周围的组织炎症倾向于高于钛和氧化锆基台。