Suppr超能文献

不同基台材料周围种植体软组织的免疫组织化学评估:一项人体研究。

Immunohistochemical assessment of the peri-implant soft tissue around different abutment materials: A human study.

机构信息

Department of Prosthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Thailand.

Esthetics Restorative and Implant Dentistry Program, Faculty of Dentistry, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Thailand.

出版信息

Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2020 Oct;22(5):638-646. doi: 10.1111/cid.12942. Epub 2020 Sep 9.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Soft tissue reaction to dental implant abutments influences the sustainability of restoration. Several abutment materials, such as titanium and gold alloy, have been introduced for strength and esthetic solutions. Zirconia and titanium-base abutments have also become popular in recent years due to high esthetic demands.

PURPOSE

To investigate the immune cell infiltration into the soft tissue in response to different abutment materials.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Twenty dental implants were placed in the posterior regions of 17 patients. Titanium, zirconia, gold alloy, and titanium-base were randomly selected for each patient on the day of surgery. After 8 weeks of healing, the abutments were removed along with 1 mm of peri-implant soft tissue. Immunohistochemical assessment was performed using labeled streptavidin-biotin to identify T cells, B cells, macrophages, plasma cells, and microvascular infiltration.

RESULTS

Gold alloy demonstrated an overall higher inflammatory cell infiltration and highest number of CD3 , CD20 , and CD 68 cells (P value <.05). The number of plasma cell and new microvascular infiltrations among abutment materials was not significantly different.

CONCLUSION

Titanium, titanium-base, and zirconia abutments showed comparable infiltration profiles; gold alloy abutments showed the highest B-cell, T cell, and macrophage infiltration. None of the abutment materials caused clinical inflammation; hence, they can be effectively used.

摘要

背景

种植体基台的软组织反应会影响修复体的稳定性。为了解决强度和美观问题,已经引入了多种基台材料,如钛和金合金。近年来,由于对美观的高要求,氧化锆和钛基基台也变得流行起来。

目的

研究不同基台材料引起的软组织内免疫细胞浸润。

材料与方法

将 20 颗种植体植入 17 名患者的后牙区。在手术当天,每位患者随机选择钛、氧化锆、金合金和钛基基台。愈合 8 周后,将基台连同 1mm 的牙周软组织一起取出。使用标记的链霉亲和素-生物素进行免疫组织化学评估,以识别 T 细胞、B 细胞、巨噬细胞、浆细胞和微血管浸润。

结果

金合金显示出总体上更高的炎症细胞浸润和最高数量的 CD3、CD20 和 CD68 细胞(P 值<.05)。基台材料之间浆细胞和新微血管浸润的数量没有显著差异。

结论

钛、钛基和氧化锆基台显示出相似的浸润模式;金合金基台显示出最高的 B 细胞、T 细胞和巨噬细胞浸润。没有一种基台材料引起临床炎症,因此它们可以有效使用。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验