a Defense and Veterans Brain Injury Center , Silver Spring , MD , USA.
b Walter Reed National Military Medical Center , Bethesda , MD , USA.
Clin Neuropsychol. 2018 Apr;32(3):391-421. doi: 10.1080/13854046.2017.1406146. Epub 2017 Nov 28.
Over the past two decades, there has been much research on measures of response bias and myriad measures have been validated in a variety of clinical and research samples. This critical review aims to guide clinicians through the use of performance validity tests (PVTs) from test selection and administration through test interpretation and feedback.
METHOD/RESULTS: Recommended cutoffs and relevant test operating characteristics are presented. Other important issues to consider during test selection, administration, interpretation, and feedback are discussed including order effects, coaching, impact on test data, and methods to combine measures and improve predictive power. When interpreting performance validity measures, neuropsychologists must use particular caution in cases of dementia, low intelligence, English as a second language/minority cultures, or low education.
PVTs provide valuable information regarding response bias and, under the right circumstances, can provide excellent evidence of response bias. Only after consideration of the entire clinical picture, including validity test performance, can concrete determinations regarding the validity of test data be made.
在过去的二十年中,已经有大量关于反应偏差测量的研究,并且已经在各种临床和研究样本中验证了无数的测量方法。本批判性综述旨在通过测试选择、管理、解释和反馈,指导临床医生使用表现有效性测试(PVT)。
方法/结果:提出了推荐的截断值和相关测试操作特征。在测试选择、管理、解释和反馈过程中还讨论了其他需要考虑的重要问题,包括顺序效应、辅导、对测试数据的影响,以及组合措施和提高预测能力的方法。当解释表现有效性测量时,神经心理学家在痴呆、低智力、第二语言/少数民族文化或低教育的情况下必须特别小心。
PVT 提供了有关反应偏差的有价值信息,并且在适当的情况下,可以提供有关反应偏差的极好证据。只有在考虑整个临床情况,包括有效性测试性能之后,才能对测试数据的有效性做出具体的判断。