AVIAN Behavioural Genomics and Physiology group, IFM Biology, Linköping University, 581 83 Linköping, Sweden.
Adaptation Physiology Group, Department of Animal Sciences, Wageningen University & Research, PO Box 338, 6700 AH Wageningen, Netherlands.
Poult Sci. 2018 Feb 1;97(2):368-377. doi: 10.3382/ps/pex326.
Restricted feeding of broiler breeders is required for improved long-term health and welfare. Because feeding frustration and hunger are major welfare concerns during rearing, many suggestions have been made to decrease the negative feelings of hunger while maintaining suitable growth rates and reproductive health. Non-daily ("skip-a-day") feeding schedules are commonly used around the world to increase portion sizes at meal times while restricting intake but these practices are prohibited in many countries due to welfare concerns on fasting days. We compared birds raised on a non-daily feeding schedule (2 non-consecutive fasting days per week, 5:2), previously suggested as a welfare-friendlier non-daily alternative, to birds raised on daily feed restriction. We found signs of increased physiological stress levels in 5:2 birds, including elevated heterophil to lymphocyte ratios (1.00 for 5:2 vs. 0.75 for daily fed at 12 weeks of age), increased adiposity (0.21% lean body weight [LBW] for 5:2 vs. 0.13% LBW for daily fed), and reduced muscle growth (pectoral muscle 5.94% LBW for 5:2 vs. 6.52% LBW for daily fed). At the same time, 5:2 birds showed signs of lower anxiety before feeding times (activity was reduced from 10.30 in daily fed to 4.85) which may be a result of the lower feed competition associated with larger portion sizes. Although we found no difference in latency to first head movement in tonic immobility between the treatments (136.5 s on average for both groups), 5:2 birds generally showed more interest in a novel object in the home pen which indicated increased risk taking and reduced fear while fasting. The 5:2 birds in this study showed no signs of learning the feeding schedule, and this unpredictability may also increase stress. Taken together, the effects of 5:2 vs. daily feed restriction on the welfare of broiler breeder pullets remain inconclusive and differ between feeding and fasting days. In addition to reducing stress by minimizing the number of fasting days, we suggest that a shift to more predictable schedules may help improve the welfare of broiler breeder pullets.
限制肉种鸡的采食量有利于改善其长期健康和福利。由于在育雏期,采食量不足和饥饿感是主要的福利问题,因此人们提出了许多建议来减少饥饿感,同时保持适当的生长速度和生殖健康。非每日(“隔日”)饲喂方案在全球范围内被广泛用于增加采食时的采食量,同时限制采食量,但由于在禁食日存在福利问题,这些方案在许多国家被禁止。我们比较了采用非每日饲喂方案(每周 2 个连续禁食日,5:2)和采用每日限饲的鸡只。我们发现,5:2 组鸡只的生理应激水平升高,包括异嗜性白细胞与淋巴细胞的比值升高(12 周龄时 5:2 组为 1.00,而每日限饲组为 0.75)、体脂增加(5:2 组为 0.21%瘦体重[LBW],而每日限饲组为 0.13%LBW)和肌肉生长减少(5:2 组胸肌的 LBW 为 5.94%,而每日限饲组为 6.52%)。与此同时,5:2 组鸡在采食前的焦虑程度较低(每日限饲组的活动水平从 10.30 减少到 4.85),这可能是由于较大的采食量导致的饲料竞争减少所致。尽管我们发现两种处理方式在强直静止潜伏期上没有差异(两组平均为 136.5 秒),但 5:2 组鸡对新物体的兴趣更高,这表明它们在禁食期间更愿意冒险和减少恐惧。本研究中的 5:2 组鸡没有表现出对饲喂方案的学习迹象,这种不可预测性也可能增加应激。总之,5:2 与每日限饲对肉种鸡育成鸡福利的影响尚无定论,并且在采食日和禁食日之间存在差异。除了通过减少禁食日的数量来减轻压力外,我们建议转向更可预测的方案可能有助于提高肉种鸡育成鸡的福利。