Trouw Nutrition, Sherwood Park, Alberta, AB T8H 2J6 Canada.
School of Agricultural and Veterinary Sciences, São Paulo State University (Unesp), Jaboticabal, São Paulo, 14884-900, Brazil.
Poult Sci. 2019 Oct 1;98(10):4705-4715. doi: 10.3382/ps/pez181.
The current experiment evaluated the effect of different feed restriction programs applied during rearing on the performance and reproductive traits of broiler breeder pullets reared on floor pens, isolating the birds' weight effect from the analysis. At 4 wk of age, 1,400 breeder pullets were distributed in a completely randomized design with 4 treatments: daily restriction (DAILY-every day feeding), skip-a-day restriction (SKIP-every other day feeding), 4/3 restriction (4/3-4 days feeding and 3 nonconsecutive fasting days) and 5/2 restriction (5/2-5 days feeding and 2 nonconsecutive fasting days), and 8 replicates. At 11, 18, 25, 32, and 39 wk of age, body weight, feed intake, feed conversion ratio, carcass composition, organs relative weight (liver, fat, oviduct, and ovary stroma), egg production, and egg weight were accessed. At 32 and 39 wk, 12 eggs by experimental unit were collected and incubated to determine hatchability and fertility parameters. Body weight, carcass EE, and FCR were higher for SKIP birds when compared to other feed restriction programs. SKIP birds also showed the lowest number of eggs per bird (NEB) and % of egg production when compared to 4/3 feeding schedule, which provided higher values. Feed conversion ratio per egg mass (FCEM) was also higher in 4/3 schedule in relation to SKIP birds. In regard to incubation parameters, 5/2 treatment showed higher values for hatchability (HAT) and fertility (FERT), similar to results of 4/3 and DAILY treatments, while SKIP birds showed the lowest. In conclusion, 4/3 and 5/2 feeding programs showed best results and should be used by broiler breeder producers to control pullets' body weight. Therefore, the higher number of eggs produced with less feed and statistically not different fertility and hatchability between programs obtained in this study suggest the 4/3 program could be more efficient than 5/2 program. Body weight'|'s effect isolation was important to analyze the effect of feed restriction program per se, and should be applied in future approaches.
当前的实验评估了在饲养过程中应用不同的限饲方案对饲养在地板笼中的肉种鸡育成期母鸡的生产性能和繁殖特性的影响,将体重效应用于分析中。在 4 周龄时,将 1400 只种母鸡随机分配到 4 个处理中:每日限饲(DAILY-每天喂食)、隔日限饲(SKIP-每隔一天喂食)、4/3 限饲(4 天喂食和 3 个不连续禁食日)和 5/2 限饲(5 天喂食和 2 个不连续禁食日),每个处理有 8 个重复。在 11、18、25、32 和 39 周龄时,测量体重、采食量、饲料转化率、体组成、器官相对重量(肝脏、脂肪、输卵管和卵巢基质)、产蛋率和蛋重。在 32 和 39 周龄时,每个实验单位收集 12 个鸡蛋进行孵化,以确定孵化率和受精率参数。与其他限饲方案相比,SKIP 组的母鸡体重、体组成 EE 和 FCR 更高。与 4/3 限饲方案相比,SKIP 组的母鸡产蛋数(NEB)和产蛋率最低。每枚蛋的饲料转化率(FCEM)在 4/3 限饲方案中也更高。就孵化参数而言,5/2 处理的孵化率(HAT)和受精率(FERT)较高,与 4/3 和 DAILY 处理的结果相似,而 SKIP 组的母鸡的孵化率最低。总之,4/3 和 5/2 限饲方案效果最好,应被肉鸡种鸡生产者用于控制母鸡体重。因此,本研究中获得的方案能以更少的饲料生产更多的蛋,且在方案之间不存在显著差异的产蛋率和孵化率表明,4/3 方案可能比 5/2 方案更有效。体重效应用于分析限饲方案本身的效果是很重要的,在未来的研究中应加以应用。