• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

重新考虑药品的强制许可:现状及其对药品可及性的影响。

Compulsory licensing of pharmaceuticals reconsidered: Current situation and implications for access to medicines.

机构信息

a Institute of Health and Environment, Seoul National University , Seoul , South Korea.

b Department of Public Health Science, Graduate School of Public Health , Seoul National University , Seoul , South Korea.

出版信息

Glob Public Health. 2018 Oct;13(10):1430-1440. doi: 10.1080/17441692.2017.1407811. Epub 2017 Nov 28.

DOI:10.1080/17441692.2017.1407811
PMID:29183271
Abstract

To examine patterns and trends in attempts, distinguished from issuance, to issue compulsory licensing of pharmaceuticals and to assess related implications in the era of high-cost medicines. Documents from various civil society organisations were primarily used to search attempts, as well as published literature. The identified attempts were analysed by pharmaceutical level, national level, claimers, and the outcomes of the attempts. There have been 108 attempts to issue compulsory licensing for 40 pharmaceuticals in 27 countries since 1995. Most of the attempts were in Asian, Latin American, and African countries and mainly for HIV/AIDS medicines. Moreover, when the claimer was the government, the likelihood of approval and positive outcomes increased. Compulsory licensing, which was devised to cope with the HIV/AIDS pandemic in low-income countries, became a practical measure in several Asian and Latin American countries, even for non-HIV/AIDS medicines. Resurgent compulsory licensing in 2012 and 2014, influenced by the global justice movement, might represent a policy window in the near future as the Doha Declaration did in the 2000s. In this context, various experiences should be circulated and analysed at the global level to better understand the circumstances under which successful issuance has been achieved at the country level.

摘要

为了研究在高药价时代尝试和区分发布药品强制许可的模式和趋势,并评估相关影响。主要使用来自各个民间社会组织的文件来搜索尝试,以及已发表的文献。通过药品级别、国家级别、申请人以及尝试的结果对已确定的尝试进行了分析。自 1995 年以来,在 27 个国家中,针对 40 种药品已进行了 108 次发布药品强制许可的尝试。大多数尝试发生在亚洲、拉丁美洲和非洲国家,主要是艾滋病毒/艾滋病药物。此外,当申请人是政府时,批准和积极结果的可能性增加。强制许可最初是为了应对低收入国家的艾滋病毒/艾滋病大流行而设计的,现在已成为一些亚洲和拉丁美洲国家的实际措施,甚至是非艾滋病毒/艾滋病药物也是如此。受全球正义运动的影响,2012 年和 2014 年强制许可的复苏可能代表着未来不久的政策窗口,就像《多哈宣言》在 21 世纪所代表的那样。在这种情况下,应在全球范围内传播和分析各种经验,以便更好地了解在国家一级成功发布的情况下的情况。

相似文献

1
Compulsory licensing of pharmaceuticals reconsidered: Current situation and implications for access to medicines.重新考虑药品的强制许可:现状及其对药品可及性的影响。
Glob Public Health. 2018 Oct;13(10):1430-1440. doi: 10.1080/17441692.2017.1407811. Epub 2017 Nov 28.
2
Compulsory Licensing of Pharmaceuticals in High-Income Countries: A Comparative Analysis.高收入国家药品强制许可:比较分析。
Milbank Q. 2022 Mar;100(1):284-313. doi: 10.1111/1468-0009.12557. Epub 2022 Mar 7.
3
Compulsory licensing often did not produce lower prices for antiretrovirals compared to international procurement.与国际采购相比,强制许可往往不会使抗逆转录病毒药物价格降低。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2015 Mar;34(3):493-501. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2014.0658.
4
Understanding of for whom, under what conditions and how the compulsory licensing of pharmaceuticals works in Brazil and Thailand: A realist synthesis.了解巴西和泰国在何种情况下如何对药品实施强制许可:一个现实主义的综合分析。
Glob Public Health. 2019 Jan;14(1):122-134. doi: 10.1080/17441692.2018.1471613. Epub 2018 May 8.
5
How Much Time Before Attempting Compulsory Licensing of Pharmaceuticals? A Non-parametric Event History Model With P-splines.在尝试对药品进行强制许可之前需要多长时间?一种带有 P-样条的非参数事件历史模型。
Int J Health Serv. 2019 Jan;49(1):68-84. doi: 10.1177/0020731418805921. Epub 2018 Oct 11.
6
Could international compulsory licensing reconcile tiered pricing of pharmaceuticals with the right to health?国际强制许可能否使药品分级定价与健康权相协调?
BMC Int Health Hum Rights. 2014 Dec 18;14:37. doi: 10.1186/s12914-014-0037-4.
7
Affordability versus innovation: Is compulsory licensing the solution?可负担性与创新:强制许可是否为解决方案?
Int J Risk Saf Med. 2019;30(4):233-247. doi: 10.3233/JRS-195007.
8
Trends in compulsory licensing of pharmaceuticals since the Doha Declaration: a database analysis.《多哈宣言》之后药品强制许可的趋势:数据库分析。
PLoS Med. 2012 Jan;9(1):e1001154. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1001154. Epub 2012 Jan 10.
9
AIDS, essential medicines, and compulsory licensing.艾滋病、基本药物与强制许可。
J Int Assoc Physicians AIDS Care. 1999 Apr;5(4):24-5.
10
Learning from practice: compulsory licensing cases and access to medicines.从实践中学习:强制许可案例与药品可及性
Pharm Pat Anal. 2012 Nov;1(5):555-75. doi: 10.4155/ppa.12.68.

引用本文的文献

1
How and why snakebite became a global health priority: a policy analysis.蛇伤为何及如何成为全球卫生重点:政策分析。
BMJ Glob Health. 2023 Aug;8(8). doi: 10.1136/bmjgh-2023-011923.
2
Trade, intellectual property, and the public health bearing.贸易、知识产权与公共卫生影响。
Health Syst (Basingstoke). 2022 Apr 12;12(1):123-132. doi: 10.1080/20476965.2022.2062460. eCollection 2023.
3
What is the impact of intellectual property rules on access to medicines? A systematic review.知识产权规则对药品可及性有何影响?一项系统综述。
Global Health. 2022 Apr 15;18(1):40. doi: 10.1186/s12992-022-00826-4.
4
Compulsory Licensing of Pharmaceuticals in High-Income Countries: A Comparative Analysis.高收入国家药品强制许可:比较分析。
Milbank Q. 2022 Mar;100(1):284-313. doi: 10.1111/1468-0009.12557. Epub 2022 Mar 7.
5
Global vaccine equity demands reparative justice - not charity.全球疫苗公平需要修复性正义——而非慈善。
BMJ Glob Health. 2021 Jun;6(6). doi: 10.1136/bmjgh-2021-006504.
6
Pharmaceutical patents: reconciling the human right to health with the incentive to invent.药品专利:在健康权与人发明激励之间寻求平衡。
Drug Discov Today. 2020 Jul;25(7):1135-1141. doi: 10.1016/j.drudis.2020.04.009. Epub 2020 Apr 20.
7
Importance of the intellectual property system in attempting compulsory licensing of pharmaceuticals: a cross-sectional analysis.论知识产权制度在药品强制许可尝试中的重要性:一项横断面分析。
Global Health. 2019 Jun 27;15(1):42. doi: 10.1186/s12992-019-0485-7.
8
Understanding the adoption of new drugs decided by several stakeholders in the South Korean market: a nonparametric event history analysis.了解韩国市场中多个利益相关者对新药的采用情况:非参数事件史分析
Health Econ Rev. 2018 Dec 4;8(1):31. doi: 10.1186/s13561-018-0216-4.