Babyar Julie
RN, MPH, 136 Reliant Way American Canyon. CA 94503.
Health Syst (Basingstoke). 2022 Apr 12;12(1):123-132. doi: 10.1080/20476965.2022.2062460. eCollection 2023.
The objective of this article is to describe the current fracture between global trade and public health priorities, as well as examine opportunities for harmonisation. A literature review of public health, global trade, and intellectual property articles describes several issues with recommendations. Currently, there is mixed quality of research and a lack of health impact assessments to accompany the global trade agenda. Human rights concepts continue in debate as flexibilities to trade laws remain without organised surveillance or evaluation. There are specific, relevant recommendations to implement a trade agenda inclusive of public health leadership. Recent trade and intellctual property advances in public health collaborations should be supported and continued. Trade groups should produce impact assessments before decisions on policies are made, with quality to the research. Lastly, a global research and development treaty should be an open, accessed path.
本文的目的是描述当前全球贸易与公共卫生优先事项之间的裂痕，并探讨协调的机会。对公共卫生、全球贸易和知识产权文章的文献综述描述了几个问题并提出了建议。目前，研究质量参差不齐，且缺乏与全球贸易议程相关的健康影响评估。人权概念仍在争论中，因为贸易法的灵活性缺乏有组织的监督或评估。有一些具体的相关建议来实施一个包含公共卫生领导力的贸易议程。公共卫生合作中近期的贸易和知识产权进展应得到支持并持续下去。贸易团体应在做出政策决定之前进行影响评估，并保证研究质量。最后，一项全球研发条约应是一条开放、可及的途径。
