Guerra-García María Mercedes, Campos-Rivas Beatriz, Sanmarful-Schwarz Alexandra, Vírseda-Sacristán Alicia, Dorrego-López M Aránzazu, Charle-Crespo Ángeles
Farmacia de Atención Primaria, Servizo de Atención Primaria de Porriño, Estructura Organizativa de Xestión Integrada de Vigo, Servizo Galego de Saúde, O Porriño, Pontevedra, España.
Medicina Familiar y Comunitaria, Hospital Álvaro Cunqueiro, Estructura Organizativa de Xestión Integrada de Vigo, Servizo Galego de Saúde, Vigo, Pontevedra, España.
Aten Primaria. 2018 Oct;50(8):486-492. doi: 10.1016/j.aprim.2017.05.013. Epub 2017 Nov 26.
To assess the extent of healthcare related adverse events (AEs), their effect on patients, and their seriousness. To analyse the factors leading to the development of AEs, their relationship with the damage caused, and their degree of preventability.
Retrospective descriptive study.
Porriño, Pontevedra, Spain, Primary Care Service, from January-2014 to April-2016.
PARTICIPANTS AND/OR CONTEXT: Reported AEs were entered into the Patient Safety Reporting and Learning System (SiNASP).
The variables measured were: Near Incident (NI) an occurrence with no effect or harm on the patient; Adverse Event (AE) an occurrence that affects or harms a patient. The level of harm is classified as minimal, minor, moderate, critical, and catastrophic. Preventability was classified as little evidence of being preventable, 50% preventable, and sound evidence of being preventable.
percentages and Chi-squared test for qualitative variables; P<.05 with SPSS.15.
SiNASP. Ethical considerations: approved by the Research Ethics Committee (2016/344).
There were 166 recorded AEs (50.6% in males, and 46.4% in women. The mean age was 60.80years). Almost two-thirds 62.7% of AEs affected the patient, with 45.8% causing minimal damage, while 2.4% caused critical damages. Healthcare professionals were a contributing factor in 71.7% of the AEs, with the trend showing that poor communication and lack of protocols were related to the damage caused. Degree of preventability: 96.4%.
Most AEs affected the patient, and were related to medication, diagnostic tests, and laboratory errors. The level of harm was related to communication problems, lack of, or deficient, protocols and a poor safety culture.
评估医疗相关不良事件(AE)的发生程度、对患者的影响及其严重性。分析导致不良事件发生的因素、其与所造成损害的关系以及可预防性程度。
回顾性描述性研究。
西班牙蓬特韦德拉省波里尼奥市初级医疗服务中心,2014年1月至2016年4月。
参与者和/或背景:报告的不良事件录入患者安全报告与学习系统(SiNASP)。
所测量的变量包括:险些事件(NI),即对患者未产生影响或伤害的事件;不良事件(AE),即对患者产生影响或伤害的事件。伤害程度分为轻微、轻度、中度、严重和灾难性。可预防性分为几乎无预防证据、50%可预防和有充分预防证据。
定性变量采用百分比和卡方检验;使用SPSS.15软件,P<0.05。
SiNASP。伦理考量:经研究伦理委员会批准(2016/344)。
共记录166起不良事件(男性占50.6%,女性占46.4%。平均年龄为60.80岁)。近三分之二(62.7%)的不良事件对患者产生了影响,其中45.8%造成轻微损害,2.4%造成严重损害。医疗专业人员是71.7%不良事件的促成因素,趋势表明沟通不良和缺乏规程与所造成的损害有关。可预防性程度:96.4%。
大多数不良事件对患者产生了影响,且与用药、诊断检查和实验室错误有关。伤害程度与沟通问题、规程缺乏或不完善以及安全文化不良有关。