John Molson School of Business, Concordia University, Canada.
Desautels Faculty of Management, McGill University, Canada; McGill Centre for the Convergence of Health and Economics (MCCHE), McGill University, Canada.
Appetite. 2018 Apr 1;123:410-438. doi: 10.1016/j.appet.2017.10.043. Epub 2017 Nov 26.
Attachment relationships play an important role in people's wellbeing and affliction with physical and mental illnesses, including eating disorders. Seven reviews from the clinical field have consistently shown that higher attachment insecurity-failure to form trusting and reliable relationships with others-systematically characterized individuals with eating disorders. Nevertheless, to date, it is unclear whether (and if so how) these findings apply to the population at large. Consequently, the objective of the present meta-analysis is to quantify the relationship between attachment and unhealthy and healthy eating in the general population. Data from 70 studies and 19,470 participants were converted into r effect sizes and analysed. Results showed that higher attachment insecurity (r = 0.266), anxiety (r = 0.271), avoidance (r = 0.119), and fearfulness (r = 0.184) was significantly associated with more unhealthy eating behaviors, ps = 0.000; conversely, higher attachment security correlated with lower unhealthy eating behaviors (r = -0.184, p = 0.000). This relationship did not vary across type of unhealthy eating behavior (i.e., binge eating, bulimic symptoms, dieting, emotional eating, and unhealthy food consumption). The little exploratory evidence concerning healthy eating and attachment was inconclusive with one exception-healthy eating was associated with lower attachment avoidance (r = -0.211, p = 0.000). Our results extend previous meta-analytic findings to show that lack of trusting and reliable relationships does not only set apart eating disordered individuals from controls, but also characterizes unhealthy eating behaviors in the general population. More evidence is needed to determine how attachment and healthy eating are linked and assess potential mechanisms influencing the attachment-eating relationship.
依恋关系在人们的幸福和身心疾病(包括饮食障碍)中起着重要作用。来自临床领域的七项综述一致表明,较高的依恋不安全感——无法与他人建立信任和可靠的关系——系统地描述了饮食障碍患者的特征。然而,迄今为止,尚不清楚这些发现是否(以及如果是如何)适用于普通人群。因此,本元分析的目的是量化一般人群中依恋与不健康和健康饮食之间的关系。从 70 项研究和 19470 名参与者中获取的数据转换为 r 效应大小并进行分析。结果表明,较高的依恋不安全感(r=0.266)、焦虑(r=0.271)、回避(r=0.119)和恐惧(r=0.184)与更多的不健康饮食行为显著相关,ps=0.000;相反,较高的依恋安全性与较低的不健康饮食行为相关(r=-0.184,p=0.000)。这种关系在不健康饮食行为的类型上没有差异(即,暴食、贪食症状、节食、情绪化进食和不健康的食物消费)。关于健康饮食和依恋的少量探索性证据尚无定论,只有一个例外——健康饮食与较低的依恋回避相关(r=-0.211,p=0.000)。我们的研究结果扩展了之前的元分析结果,表明缺乏信任和可靠的关系不仅将饮食障碍患者与对照组区分开来,而且还描述了普通人群中不健康的饮食行为。需要更多的证据来确定依恋和健康饮食是如何联系的,并评估影响依恋-饮食关系的潜在机制。