National Research Centre for the Working Environment, 2100, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Scand J Work Environ Health. 2018 Mar 1;44(2):163-170. doi: 10.5271/sjweh.3693. Epub 2017 Nov 29.
Objectives This study aimed to determine the extent to which age, gender, body mass index (BMI) and low-back pain (LBP) influence bias in self-reported sedentary behavior and moderate-to-vigorous physical activity (MVPA) among blue-collar workers. Methods For 2-4 consecutive working days, 147 workers wore an Actigraph accelerometer on the thigh. Proportional time spent sedentary and in MVPA was determined using the Acti4 software. The same variables were also self-reported in a questionnaire. The difference between self-reported and accelerometer-based sedentary time and MVPA was calculated and linearly regressed against age, gender, BMI, and self-reported LBP intensity as main effects, as well as interaction terms combining each of these factors with objectively measured exposure. Results Workers objectively spent 64% of their time sedentary and 9% in MVPA. On average, self-reports underestimated sedentary time by 1.5% and overestimated MVPA by 5.5%. Workers with mild/no LBP appeared to have the same size of self-report bias in MVPA regardless of how much MVPA they actually had, while workers with high LBP overestimated MVPA to an increasing extent with increasing exposure [interaction: B=0.29, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.05-0.53]. Age was positively associated with self-report bias in sedentary time (B=0.31, 95% CI 0.09-0.54) regardless of actual sedentary time. Conclusions LBP and age, but not BMI and gender, introduced differential bias in self-reported information on sedentary behavior and MVPA among blue-collar workers. This result suggests that bias correction in future studies based on self-reports of sedentary time and MVPA should account for LBP and age.
本研究旨在确定年龄、性别、体重指数(BMI)和下背痛(LBP)在多大程度上影响蓝领工人自我报告的久坐行为和中高强度体力活动(MVPA)的偏差。
在 2-4 个连续的工作日中,147 名工人将加速度计佩戴在大腿上。使用 Acti4 软件确定久坐时间和 MVPA 的比例。相同的变量也在问卷中进行了自我报告。计算自我报告和基于加速度计的久坐时间和 MVPA 之间的差异,并将其与年龄、性别、BMI 和自我报告的 LBP 强度作为主要影响因素进行线性回归,以及将这些因素中的每一个与客观测量的暴露相结合的交互项。
工人客观上有 64%的时间处于久坐状态,9%的时间处于 MVPA 状态。平均而言,自我报告低估了久坐时间 1.5%,高估了 MVPA 时间 5.5%。轻度/无 LBP 的工人无论实际进行了多少 MVPA,其 MVPA 的自我报告偏差大小似乎相同,而 LBP 较高的工人随着暴露量的增加,对 MVPA 的高估程度也随之增加[交互作用:B=0.29,95%置信区间(CI)0.05-0.53]。无论实际的久坐时间如何,年龄都与久坐时间的自我报告偏差呈正相关(B=0.31,95% CI 0.09-0.54)。
LBP 和年龄,但不是 BMI 和性别,在蓝领工人自我报告的久坐行为和 MVPA 信息中引入了差异偏差。这一结果表明,基于自我报告的久坐时间和 MVPA 的未来研究应该考虑到 LBP 和年龄,进行偏差校正。