• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

比较日本制造厂中白领和蓝领工人的加速度计测量的久坐行为以及低强度、中强度和高强度体力活动。

Comparison of accelerometer-measured sedentary behavior, and light- and moderate-to-vigorous-intensity physical activity in white- and blue-collar workers in a Japanese manufacturing plant.

机构信息

Department of Preventive Medicine and Public Health, Tokyo Medical University.

Faculty of Health Sciences, Kyorin University.

出版信息

J Occup Health. 2018 May 25;60(3):246-253. doi: 10.1539/joh.2017-0276-OA. Epub 2018 Mar 20.

DOI:10.1539/joh.2017-0276-OA
PMID:29563367
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5985348/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

The times spent in sedentary behavior (SB) and moderate-to-vigorous physical activity (MVPA) are independently associated with health outcomes; however, objective data on physical activity levels including SB among different occupations is limited. We compared accelerometer-measured times spent in SB, light-intensity physical activity (LPA), and MVPA, and the patterns associated with prolonged bouts of SB between white- and blue-collar workers.

METHODS

The study population consisted of 102 full-time plant workers (54 white-collar and 48 blue-collar) who wore a triaxial accelerometer during waking hours for 5 working days. Accelerometer-measured activity levels were categorized as SB (≤1.5 metabolic equivalents (METs)), LPA (1.6-2.9 METs), and MVPA (≥3.0 METs). A sedentary bout was defined as consecutive minutes during which the accelerometer registered less than ≤1.5 METs. Accelerometer variables were compared between white- and blue-collar workers through analysis of covariance.

RESULTS

During working hours, white-collar workers spent significantly more time in SB and less time in LPA than blue-collar workers (SB: 6.4 h vs. 4.8 h, 73% vs. 55% of total work time; LPA: 1.9 h vs. 3.5 h, 22% vs. 40% of total work time, p<.001), whereas the MVPA time was similar between the groups. White-collar workers spent significantly more SB time in prolonged sedentary bouts (≥30 min) compared to blue-collar workers. During leisure time, the SB, LPA, and MVPA times were similar between the groups.

CONCLUSIONS

White-collar workers have significantly longer SB times than blue-collar workers during work hours, and do not compensate for their excess SB during work by reducing SB during leisure time.

摘要

目的

久坐行为(SB)和中等到剧烈体力活动(MVPA)所花费的时间与健康结果独立相关;然而,关于不同职业人群的体力活动水平,包括 SB 的客观数据是有限的。我们比较了白领和蓝领工人之间使用三轴加速度计测量的 SB、低强度体力活动(LPA)和 MVPA 所花费的时间,以及与长时间 SB 相关的模式。

方法

研究人群由 102 名全职工厂工人(54 名白领和 48 名蓝领)组成,他们在清醒状态下连续 5 个工作日佩戴三轴加速度计。使用加速度计测量的活动水平被分为 SB(≤1.5 代谢当量(METs))、LPA(1.6-2.9 METs)和 MVPA(≥3.0 METs)。久坐行为是指连续记录的加速度计读数小于或等于≤1.5 METs 的分钟数。通过协方差分析比较白领和蓝领工人之间的加速度计变量。

结果

在工作时间内,白领工人 SB 时间明显多于蓝领工人,而 LPA 时间明显少于蓝领工人(SB:6.4 h 比 4.8 h,占总工作时间的 73%比 55%;LPA:1.9 h 比 3.5 h,占总工作时间的 22%比 40%,p<.001),而 MVPA 时间两组相似。白领工人 SB 时间中长时间久坐行为(≥30 分钟)明显多于蓝领工人。在闲暇时间,两组之间的 SB、LPA 和 MVPA 时间相似。

结论

在工作时间内,白领工人的 SB 时间明显长于蓝领工人,而且在闲暇时间并没有通过减少 SB 来弥补工作时的过多 SB。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2cf1/5985348/f872411d59fe/1348-9585-60-246-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2cf1/5985348/a5b21e284640/1348-9585-60-246-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2cf1/5985348/f872411d59fe/1348-9585-60-246-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2cf1/5985348/a5b21e284640/1348-9585-60-246-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2cf1/5985348/f872411d59fe/1348-9585-60-246-g002.jpg

相似文献

1
Comparison of accelerometer-measured sedentary behavior, and light- and moderate-to-vigorous-intensity physical activity in white- and blue-collar workers in a Japanese manufacturing plant.比较日本制造厂中白领和蓝领工人的加速度计测量的久坐行为以及低强度、中强度和高强度体力活动。
J Occup Health. 2018 May 25;60(3):246-253. doi: 10.1539/joh.2017-0276-OA. Epub 2018 Mar 20.
2
Exposure to prolonged sedentary behavior on weekdays rather than weekends in white-collar workers in comparison with blue-collar workers.与蓝领工人相比,白领工人在工作日而非周末长时间久坐。
J Occup Health. 2021 Jan;63(1):e12246. doi: 10.1002/1348-9585.12246.
3
What Is the Effect on Obesity Indicators from Replacing Prolonged Sedentary Time with Brief Sedentary Bouts, Standing and Different Types of Physical Activity during Working Days? A Cross-Sectional Accelerometer-Based Study among Blue-Collar Workers.工作日期间,用短暂久坐时段、站立及不同类型的体育活动替代长时间久坐时间,对肥胖指标有何影响?一项基于加速度计的蓝领工人横断面研究。
PLoS One. 2016 May 17;11(5):e0154935. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0154935. eCollection 2016.
4
Sedentary behaviors and physical activity of the working population measured by accelerometry: a systematic review and meta-analysis.使用加速度计测量的工作人群的久坐行为和身体活动:系统评价和荟萃分析。
BMC Public Health. 2024 Aug 6;24(1):2123. doi: 10.1186/s12889-024-19449-y.
5
Bidirectional associations of accelerometer-derived physical activity and stationary behavior with self-reported mental and physical health during midlife.使用加速度计测量的身体活动和固定行为与中年时自我报告的精神和身体健康的双向关联。
Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2021 Jun 6;18(1):74. doi: 10.1186/s12966-021-01145-4.
6
Does duration of physical activity bouts matter for adiposity and metabolic syndrome? A cross-sectional study of older British men.体育活动单次持续时间对肥胖和代谢综合征有影响吗?一项针对英国老年男性的横断面研究。
Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2016 Mar 15;13:36. doi: 10.1186/s12966-016-0361-2.
7
Association of occupation with the daily physical activity and sedentary behaviour of middle-aged workers in Korea: a cross-sectional study based on data from the Korea National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey.韩国中年工人职业与日常体力活动和久坐行为的关联:基于韩国国家健康和营养检查调查数据的横断面研究。
BMJ Open. 2021 Nov 3;11(11):e055729. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-055729.
8
Associations Between Parent Self-Reported and Accelerometer-Measured Physical Activity and Sedentary Time in Children: Ecological Momentary Assessment Study.家长自报和加速度计测量的儿童身体活动和久坐时间之间的关联:生态瞬时评估研究。
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2020 May 19;8(5):e15458. doi: 10.2196/15458.
9
The association between occupational standing and sedentary leisure time over consecutive workdays among blue-collar workers in manual jobs.体力劳动者工作日间职业地位与久坐休闲时间的关联。
Int Arch Occup Environ Health. 2019 May;92(4):481-490. doi: 10.1007/s00420-018-1378-4. Epub 2018 Nov 13.
10
Daily domain-specific time-use composition of physical behaviors and blood pressure.日常特定领域的时间分配与身体活动和血压
Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2019 Jan 10;16(1):4. doi: 10.1186/s12966-018-0766-1.

引用本文的文献

1
Automotive workers: the role of coordinative and conditional abilities as effectiveness wellness indicator.汽车工人:协调能力和条件能力作为有效性健康指标的作用。
Front Public Health. 2024 Oct 14;12:1447358. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1447358. eCollection 2024.
2
mHealth Intervention to Promote Physical Activity Among Employees Using a Deep Learning Model for Passive Monitoring of Depression and Anxiety: Single-Arm Feasibility Trial.使用深度学习模型对抑郁和焦虑进行被动监测的移动健康干预措施,以促进员工的身体活动:单臂可行性试验。
JMIR Form Res. 2023 Nov 17;7:e51334. doi: 10.2196/51334.
3
Association between Physical Activity Guidelines and Sedentary Time with Workers' Health-Related Quality of Life in a Spanish Multinational Company.

本文引用的文献

1
Accelerometer-measured dose-response for physical activity, sedentary time, and mortality in US adults.美国成年人中通过加速度计测量的身体活动、久坐时间与死亡率之间的剂量反应关系。
Am J Clin Nutr. 2016 Nov;104(5):1424-1432. doi: 10.3945/ajcn.116.135129. Epub 2016 Oct 5.
2
The sedentary office: an expert statement on the growing case for change towards better health and productivity.久坐的办公环境:改善健康和提高生产力的专家观点。
Br J Sports Med. 2015 Nov;49(21):1357-62. doi: 10.1136/bjsports-2015-094618. Epub 2015 Jun 1.
3
Effect of Moderate to Vigorous Physical Activity on All-Cause Mortality in Middle-aged and Older Australians.
体力活动指南与工间久坐时间对西班牙跨国公司员工健康相关生活质量的关联。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 May 28;19(11):6592. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19116592.
4
The Impact of Lifetime Work and Non-work Physical Activity on Physical Fitness Among White - and Blue - Collar Retirees: A Cross-Sectional Study.终身工作和非工作身体活动对白领和蓝领退休人员身体素质的影响:一项横断面研究
Front Med (Lausanne). 2021 Dec 15;8:745929. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2021.745929. eCollection 2021.
5
Respiratory Function and Muscle Strength Vs. Past Work Type: a Cross-Sectional Study Among Retirees.呼吸功能和肌肉力量与过去工作类型的关系:一项针对退休人员的横断面研究。
Can Geriatr J. 2021 Dec 1;24(4):297-303. doi: 10.5770/cgj.24.501. eCollection 2021 Dec.
6
Association between sitting time at work and the onset of major depressive episode: a 1-year prospective cohort study using the Bayesian regression.工作时久坐时间与重度抑郁发作发病的关联:一项使用贝叶斯回归的 1 年前瞻性队列研究。
BMC Public Health. 2021 Oct 29;21(1):1960. doi: 10.1186/s12889-021-12059-y.
7
Prolonged sedentary time under the state of emergency during the first wave of coronavirus disease 2019: Assessing the impact of work environment in Japan.2019 年冠状病毒病第一波紧急状态下久坐时间延长:评估日本工作环境的影响。
J Occup Health. 2021 Jan;63(1):e12260. doi: 10.1002/1348-9585.12260.
8
Exposure to prolonged sedentary behavior on weekdays rather than weekends in white-collar workers in comparison with blue-collar workers.与蓝领工人相比,白领工人在工作日而非周末长时间久坐。
J Occup Health. 2021 Jan;63(1):e12246. doi: 10.1002/1348-9585.12246.
9
Assessment of Spinal Range of Motion and Musculoskeletal Discomfort in Forklift Drivers. A Cross-Sectional Study.叉车司机脊柱活动范围和肌肉骨骼不适的评估。一项横断面研究。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Mar 13;18(6):2947. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18062947.
10
Associations of working from home with occupational physical activity and sedentary behavior under the COVID-19 pandemic.新冠疫情期间居家办公与职业体力活动和久坐行为的关联。
J Occup Health. 2021 Jan;63(1):e12212. doi: 10.1002/1348-9585.12212.
中老年人中等至剧烈身体活动对全因死亡率的影响。
JAMA Intern Med. 2015 Jun;175(6):970-7. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2015.0541.
4
Leisure time physical activity and mortality: a detailed pooled analysis of the dose-response relationship.休闲时间身体活动与死亡率:剂量反应关系的详细汇总分析
JAMA Intern Med. 2015 Jun;175(6):959-67. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2015.0533.
5
Sedentary time and its association with risk for disease incidence, mortality, and hospitalization in adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis.久坐时间与成年人疾病发病率、死亡率和住院率的关系:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Ann Intern Med. 2015 Jan 20;162(2):123-32. doi: 10.7326/M14-1651.
6
Weekday and weekend patterns of objectively measured sitting, standing, and stepping in a sample of office-based workers: the active buildings study.工作日和周末在办公室工作人员样本中客观测量的坐姿、站立和踏步模式:活跃建筑研究。
BMC Public Health. 2015 Jan 17;15:9. doi: 10.1186/s12889-014-1338-1.
7
Definition, measurement, and health risks associated with sedentary behavior.久坐行为的定义、测量方法及其健康风险。
Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2015 Jun;47(6):1295-300. doi: 10.1249/MSS.0000000000000517.
8
Breaking up workplace sitting time with intermittent standing bouts improves fatigue and musculoskeletal discomfort in overweight/obese office workers.通过间歇性站立打破工作场所的久坐时间,可改善超重/肥胖上班族的疲劳和肌肉骨骼不适。
Occup Environ Med. 2014 Nov;71(11):765-71. doi: 10.1136/oemed-2014-102348. Epub 2014 Aug 28.
9
Sedentary behavior and health outcomes: an overview of systematic reviews.久坐行为与健康结局:系统评价综述
PLoS One. 2014 Aug 21;9(8):e105620. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0105620. eCollection 2014.
10
Alternating bouts of sitting and standing attenuate postprandial glucose responses.坐姿和站立姿势交替可减轻餐后血糖反应。
Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2014 Nov;46(11):2053-61. doi: 10.1249/MSS.0000000000000337.