• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Unequal Exposure or Unequal Vulnerability? Contributions of Neighborhood Conditions and Cardiovascular Risk Factors to Socioeconomic Inequality in Incident Cardiovascular Disease in the Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis.不平等的暴露还是不平等的脆弱性?邻里条件和心血管危险因素对动脉粥样硬化多民族研究中心新发心血管疾病中社会经济不平等的贡献。
Am J Epidemiol. 2018 Jul 1;187(7):1424-1437. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwx363.
2
Neighborhood-level racial/ethnic residential segregation and incident cardiovascular disease: the multi-ethnic study of atherosclerosis.社区层面的种族/族裔居住隔离与心血管疾病事件:动脉粥样硬化多民族研究
Circulation. 2015 Jan 13;131(2):141-8. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.114.011345. Epub 2014 Dec 1.
3
Longitudinal Associations Between Neighborhood Physical and Social Environments and Incident Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: The Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis (MESA).社区物理和社会环境与2型糖尿病发病之间的纵向关联:动脉粥样硬化多民族研究(MESA)
JAMA Intern Med. 2015 Aug;175(8):1311-20. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2015.2691.
4
The Impact of Neighborhoods on CV Risk.社区对心血管疾病风险的影响。
Glob Heart. 2016 Sep;11(3):353-363. doi: 10.1016/j.gheart.2016.08.002.
5
Neighborhood stressors and race/ethnic differences in hypertension prevalence (the Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis).邻里压力源与高血压患病率的种族/民族差异(动脉粥样硬化的多种族研究)。
Am J Hypertens. 2011 Feb;24(2):187-93. doi: 10.1038/ajh.2010.200. Epub 2010 Sep 16.
6
Neighborhoods and racial/ethnic differences in ideal cardiovascular health (the Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis).理想心血管健康状况下的社区及种族/民族差异(动脉粥样硬化多民族研究)
Health Place. 2017 Mar;44:61-69. doi: 10.1016/j.healthplace.2017.01.005. Epub 2017 Feb 4.
7
Person-Centered Approach to Understanding Psychosocial Stressor Subgroups and Cardiovascular Disease: New Perspectives From the Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis Study.以患者为中心理解心理社会应激源亚组与心血管疾病的方法:动脉粥样硬化多民族研究的新视角
J Am Heart Assoc. 2025 Jan 21;14(2):e038844. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.124.038844. Epub 2025 Jan 22.
8
Measures of socioeconomic position are not consistently associated with ethnic differences in cardiovascular disease in Scotland: methods from the Scottish Health and Ethnicity Linkage Study (SHELS).社会经济地位的衡量指标与苏格兰心血管疾病的种族差异之间没有始终如一的关联:来自苏格兰健康与种族联系研究(SHELS)的方法。
Int J Epidemiol. 2014 Feb;43(1):129-39. doi: 10.1093/ije/dyt237. Epub 2013 Dec 19.
9
Neighborhood Environments and Incident Hypertension in the Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis.社区环境与动脉粥样硬化多民族研究中的高血压发病情况
Am J Epidemiol. 2016 Jun 1;183(11):988-97. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwv296. Epub 2016 May 8.
10
Life-course socioeconomic positions and subclinical atherosclerosis in the multi-ethnic study of atherosclerosis.动脉粥样硬化多民族研究中的生命历程社会经济地位与亚临床动脉粥样硬化
Soc Sci Med. 2009 Feb;68(3):444-51. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2008.10.038. Epub 2008 Dec 10.

引用本文的文献

1
Complex interaction of waist circumference, cardiometabolic markers, and sex on elderly mortality: a cohort study of 0.4 million UK adults.腰围、心脏代谢标志物和性别对老年人死亡率的复杂相互作用:一项对40万英国成年人的队列研究。
NPJ Metab Health Dis. 2025 Jul 2;3(1):31. doi: 10.1038/s44324-025-00075-0.
2
Structural and social determinants of health: The multi-ethnic study of atherosclerosis.健康的结构和社会决定因素:动脉粥样硬化的多种族研究。
PLoS One. 2024 Nov 18;19(11):e0313625. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0313625. eCollection 2024.
3
Neighborhood socioeconomic position, living arrangements, and cardiometabolic disease among older Puerto Ricans: An examination using PREHCO 2002-2007.波多黎各老年人的社区社会经济地位、居住安排与心血管代谢疾病:利用 PREHCO 2002-2007 进行的考察。
PLoS One. 2023 Aug 1;18(8):e0289170. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0289170. eCollection 2023.
4
A qualitative crossroads of rhythm and race: Black patients' experiences living with atrial fibrillation.节奏与种族的质性交叉点:黑人房颤患者的生活经历
Am Heart J Plus. 2023 Apr;28. doi: 10.1016/j.ahjo.2023.100293. Epub 2023 Mar 29.
5
Do associations of physical activity and sedentary behaviour with cardiovascular disease and mortality differ across socioeconomic groups? A prospective analysis of device-measured and self-reported UK Biobank data.身体活动和久坐行为与心血管疾病和死亡率的关联是否因社会经济群体而异?使用设备测量和自我报告的英国生物库数据分析。
Br J Sports Med. 2023 Jul;57(14):921-929. doi: 10.1136/bjsports-2022-105435. Epub 2023 Feb 8.
6
Current practice and recommendations for advancing how human variability and susceptibility are considered in chemical risk assessment.当前在化学风险评估中推进考虑人类变异性和易感性的实践和建议。
Environ Health. 2023 Jan 12;21(Suppl 1):133. doi: 10.1186/s12940-022-00940-1.
7
Vulnerability to Hypertension Is a Major Determinant of Racial Disparities in Alzheimer's Disease Risk.易患高血压是导致阿尔茨海默病风险的种族差异的主要决定因素。
Am J Hypertens. 2022 Aug 1;35(8):745-751. doi: 10.1093/ajh/hpac063.
8
Educational Attainment and Lifestyle Risk Factors Associated With All-Cause Mortality in the US.教育程度和生活方式风险因素与美国全因死亡率的关系。
JAMA Health Forum. 2022 Apr;3(4). doi: 10.1001/jamahealthforum.2022.0401. Epub 2022 Apr 8.
9
Life-Course Neighborhood Socioeconomic Status and Cardiovascular Events in Black and White Adults in the Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities Study.《社区动脉粥样硬化风险研究中黑人和白人成年人的生命历程邻里社会经济地位与心血管事件》
Am J Epidemiol. 2022 Jul 23;191(8):1470-1484. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwac070.
10
Associations between neighborhood socioeconomic cluster and hypertension, diabetes, myocardial infarction, and coronary artery disease within a cohort of cardiac catheterization patients.在一组接受心脏导管检查的患者中,社区社会经济聚类与高血压、糖尿病、心肌梗死和冠状动脉疾病之间的关联。
Am Heart J. 2022 Jan;243:201-209. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2021.09.013. Epub 2021 Oct 2.

本文引用的文献

1
Health Equity and the Fallacy of Treating Causes of Population Health as if They Sum to 100.健康公平与将人群健康原因视为总和为100的谬误
Am J Public Health. 2017 Apr;107(4):541-549. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2017.303655.
2
Interaction between smoking and depressive symptoms with subclinical heart disease in the Coronary Artery Risk Development in Young Adults (CARDIA) study.在年轻人冠状动脉风险发展研究(CARDIA研究)中,吸烟与抑郁症状和亚临床心脏病之间的相互作用。
Health Psychol. 2017 Feb;36(2):101-111. doi: 10.1037/hea0000425. Epub 2016 Oct 13.
3
Heart Disease and Stroke Statistics-2016 Update: A Report From the American Heart Association.《2016年心脏病和中风统计数据更新:美国心脏协会报告》
Circulation. 2016 Jan 26;133(4):e38-360. doi: 10.1161/CIR.0000000000000350. Epub 2015 Dec 16.
4
Rising morbidity and mortality in midlife among white non-Hispanic Americans in the 21st century.21世纪美国非西班牙裔白人中年人群中发病率和死亡率的上升。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2015 Dec 8;112(49):15078-83. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1518393112. Epub 2015 Nov 2.
5
Using Decomposition Analysis to Identify Modifiable Racial Disparities in the Distribution of Blood Pressure in the United States.运用分解分析来识别美国血压分布中可改变的种族差异。
Am J Epidemiol. 2015 Aug 15;182(4):345-53. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwv079. Epub 2015 Jul 21.
6
Importance of sex and gender in atherosclerosis and cardiovascular disease.性别在动脉粥样硬化和心血管疾病中的重要性。
Atherosclerosis. 2015 Jul;241(1):208-10. doi: 10.1016/j.atherosclerosis.2015.04.806. Epub 2015 Apr 29.
7
When is the difference method conservative for assessing mediation?在评估中介效应时,差异法何时具有保守性?
Am J Epidemiol. 2015 Jul 15;182(2):105-8. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwv059. Epub 2015 May 5.
8
A history of the population attributable fraction and related measures.人口归因分数及相关措施的历史。
Ann Epidemiol. 2015 Mar;25(3):147-54. doi: 10.1016/j.annepidem.2014.11.015. Epub 2014 Dec 11.
9
How can inequalities in mortality be reduced? A quantitative analysis of 6 risk factors in 21 European populations.如何降低死亡率不平等?对21个欧洲人群中6个风险因素的定量分析。
PLoS One. 2014 Nov 4;9(11):e110952. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0110952. eCollection 2014.
10
Associations of chronic individual-level and neighbourhood-level stressors with incident coronary heart disease: the Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis.个体层面和社区层面的慢性应激源与冠心病发病的关联:动脉粥样硬化多民族研究
J Epidemiol Community Health. 2015 Feb;69(2):136-41. doi: 10.1136/jech-2014-204217. Epub 2014 Sep 30.

不平等的暴露还是不平等的脆弱性?邻里条件和心血管危险因素对动脉粥样硬化多民族研究中心新发心血管疾病中社会经济不平等的贡献。

Unequal Exposure or Unequal Vulnerability? Contributions of Neighborhood Conditions and Cardiovascular Risk Factors to Socioeconomic Inequality in Incident Cardiovascular Disease in the Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis.

机构信息

Joseph J. Zilber School of Public Health, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee, Milwaukee, Wisconsin.

Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Dornsife School of Public Health, Drexel University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.

出版信息

Am J Epidemiol. 2018 Jul 1;187(7):1424-1437. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwx363.

DOI:10.1093/aje/kwx363
PMID:29186311
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6030985/
Abstract

Risk factors can drive socioeconomic inequalities in cardiovascular disease (CVD) through differential exposure and differential vulnerability. In this paper, we show how econometric decomposition directly enables simultaneous, policy-oriented assessment of these 2 mechanisms. We specifically estimate contributions of neighborhood environment and proximal risk factors to socioeconomic inequality in CVD incidence via these mechanisms. We followed 5,608 participants in the Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis (2000-2012) to their first CVD event (median length of follow-up, 12.2 years). We used a summary measure of baseline socioeconomic position (SEP). Covariates included baseline demographics, neighborhood characteristics, and psychosocial, behavioral, and biomedical risk factors. Using Poisson models, we decomposed the difference (inequality) in incidence rates between low- and high-SEP groups into contributions of 1) differences in covariate means (differential exposure) and 2) differences in CVD risk associated with covariates (differential vulnerability). Notwithstanding large uncertainty in neighborhood estimates, our analysis suggested that differential exposure to poorer neighborhood socioeconomic conditions, adverse social environment, diabetes, and hypertension accounted for most of the inequality. Psychosocial and behavioral contributions were negligible. Further, neighborhood SEP, female sex, and white race were more strongly associated with CVD among low-SEP (vs. high-SEP) participants. These differentials in vulnerability also accounted for nontrivial portions of the inequality and could have important implications for intervention.

摘要

风险因素可通过不同的暴露和脆弱性导致心血管疾病(CVD)的社会经济不平等。本文展示了如何通过计量经济学分解直接同时评估这两种机制。我们通过这些机制,具体估计了邻里环境和近端风险因素对 CVD 发病率的社会经济不平等的贡献。我们对动脉粥样硬化多民族研究(2000-2012 年)中的 5608 名参与者进行随访,直至他们首次发生 CVD 事件(中位随访时间为 12.2 年)。我们使用基线社会经济地位(SEP)的综合衡量标准。协变量包括基线人口统计学特征、邻里特征以及心理社会、行为和生物医学风险因素。我们使用泊松模型将低和高 SEP 组之间的发病率差异(不平等)分解为以下因素的贡献:1)协变量均值差异(差异暴露)和 2)与协变量相关的 CVD 风险差异(差异脆弱性)。尽管邻里环境估计存在很大的不确定性,但我们的分析表明,对较差的邻里社会经济条件、不利的社会环境、糖尿病和高血压的差异暴露解释了大部分不平等。心理社会和行为因素的贡献可以忽略不计。此外,在低 SEP(与高 SEP 相比)参与者中,邻里 SEP、女性和白种人种族与 CVD 的相关性更强。脆弱性的这些差异也导致了不平等的相当大的部分,这可能对干预具有重要意义。