• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

基于社区的干预措施对器官捐献登记率影响的系统叙述性综述

A Systematic Narrative Review of Effects of Community-Based Intervention on Rates of Organ Donor Registration.

作者信息

Golding Sarah Elizabeth, Cropley Mark

机构信息

1 Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, School of Psychology, University of Surrey, Guildford, United Kingdom.

出版信息

Prog Transplant. 2017 Sep;27(3):295-308. doi: 10.1177/1526924817715461. Epub 2017 Jul 4.

DOI:10.1177/1526924817715461
PMID:29187095
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The demand for organ donation is increasing worldwide. One possible way of increasing the pool of potential posthumous donors is to encourage more members of the general public to join an organ donor registry.

OBJECTIVE

A systematic review was conducted to investigate the effectiveness of psychological interventions designed to increase the number of individuals in the community who register as organ donors.

METHODS

PsycINFO and PubMed databases were searched. No date limits were set. Randomized and nonrandomized controlled trials exploring the effects of community-based interventions on organ donor registration rates were included. Methodological quality was assessed using the "Quality Assessment Tool for Quantitative Studies."

RESULTS

Twenty-four studies met the inclusion criteria; 19 studies found a positive intervention effect on registration. Only 8 studies were assessed as having reasonable methodological robustness. A narrative synthesis was conducted. Factors influencing registration rates include providing an immediate registration opportunity and using brief interventions to challenge misconceptions and concerns about organ donation.

DISCUSSION

Community-based interventions can be effective at increasing organ donor registrations among the general public. Factors that may increase effectiveness include brief interventions to address concerns and providing an immediate registration opportunity. Particular consideration should be paid to the fidelity of intervention delivery. Protocol registration number: CRD42014012975.

摘要

背景

全球对器官捐赠的需求日益增加。增加潜在的死后器官捐赠者数量的一种可能方法是鼓励更多普通公众加入器官捐赠登记系统。

目的

进行一项系统评价,以调查旨在增加社区中登记为器官捐赠者的个体数量的心理干预措施的有效性。

方法

检索了PsycINFO和PubMed数据库。未设置日期限制。纳入探讨基于社区的干预措施对器官捐赠登记率影响的随机和非随机对照试验。使用“定量研究质量评估工具”评估方法学质量。

结果

24项研究符合纳入标准;19项研究发现干预对登记有积极影响。只有8项研究被评估为具有合理的方法学稳健性。进行了叙述性综合分析。影响登记率的因素包括提供即时登记机会以及使用简短干预来挑战对器官捐赠的误解和担忧。

讨论

基于社区的干预措施在增加普通公众中的器官捐赠登记方面可能有效。可能提高有效性的因素包括解决担忧的简短干预和提供即时登记机会。应特别考虑干预实施的保真度。方案注册号:CRD42014012975。

相似文献

1
A Systematic Narrative Review of Effects of Community-Based Intervention on Rates of Organ Donor Registration.基于社区的干预措施对器官捐献登记率影响的系统叙述性综述
Prog Transplant. 2017 Sep;27(3):295-308. doi: 10.1177/1526924817715461. Epub 2017 Jul 4.
2
Primary care interventions to encourage organ donation registration: A systematic review.鼓励器官捐献登记的初级保健干预措施:系统评价。
Transplant Rev (Orlando). 2017 Oct;31(4):268-275. doi: 10.1016/j.trre.2017.08.006. Epub 2017 Sep 2.
3
If you needed an organ transplant would you have one? The effect of reciprocity priming and mode of delivery on organ donor registration intentions and behaviour.如果你需要进行器官移植,你会接受吗?互惠启动和传递方式对器官捐赠登记意愿及行为的影响。
Br J Health Psychol. 2017 Sep;22(3):577-588. doi: 10.1111/bjhp.12248. Epub 2017 May 26.
4
Guiding Strategies for the Future of Vascularized Composite Allotransplantation: A Systematic Review of Organ Donation Campaigns.血管化复合组织同种异体移植的未来指导策略:器官捐献运动的系统评价。
Plast Reconstr Surg. 2020 Oct;146(4):922-934. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000007187.
5
Promoting deceased organ and tissue donation registration in family physician waiting rooms (RegisterNow-1 trial): study protocol for a pragmatic, stepped-wedge, cluster randomized controlled registry.在家庭医生候诊室推广已故器官和组织捐赠登记(RegisterNow-1试验):一项实用的、阶梯式楔形、整群随机对照登记研究方案
Trials. 2017 Dec 21;18(1):610. doi: 10.1186/s13063-017-2333-5.
6
Interventions aimed at healthcare professionals to increase the number of organ donors: a systematic review.旨在提高器官捐献者数量的医护人员干预措施:系统评价。
Crit Care. 2019 Jun 20;23(1):227. doi: 10.1186/s13054-019-2509-3.
7
Utilizing a Hospital-based Setting to Increase Organ Donor Registrations.利用医院环境提高器官捐献登记率。
Transplantation. 2020 Jun;104(6):1210-1214. doi: 10.1097/TP.0000000000002981.
8
A systematic review of presumed consent systems for deceased organ donation.对已故器官捐赠的推定同意系统的系统评价。
Health Technol Assess. 2009 May;13(26):iii, ix-xi, 1-95. doi: 10.3310/hta13260.
9
Organ Procurement Organization Run Department of Motor Vehicle Registration and Drivers Licensing Offices Leads to Increased Organ Donor First Person Authorization Registrations.器官获取组织运行机动车辆登记和驾驶执照办公室导致更多的器官捐献者第一人称授权登记。
Transplantation. 2020 Feb;104(2):343-348. doi: 10.1097/TP.0000000000002842.
10
A Qualitative Study of Turning Points or Aha! Moments in Older Adults' Discussions About Organ Donation.一项关于老年人器官捐赠讨论中的转折点或顿悟时刻的定性研究。
Prog Transplant. 2018 Sep;28(3):207-212. doi: 10.1177/1526924818781563. Epub 2018 Jun 11.

引用本文的文献

1
Evaluation of liver transplantation services in Kazakhstan from 2012 to 2023.2012年至2023年哈萨克斯坦肝脏移植服务评估
Sci Rep. 2024 Apr 23;14(1):9304. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-60086-7.
2
Interventions for increasing solid organ donor registration.增加实体器官捐献者登记的干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Apr 4;4(4):CD10829. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010829.pub2.
3
Neighborhood socioeconomic deprivation, racial segregation, and organ donation across 5 states.5 个州的邻里社会经济贫困程度、种族隔离与器官捐赠。
Am J Transplant. 2021 Mar;21(3):1206-1214. doi: 10.1111/ajt.16186. Epub 2020 Aug 4.
4
Increasing Organ Donor Designation Rates in Adolescents: A Cluster Randomized Trial.提高青少年器官捐献指定率:一项整群随机试验。
Am J Public Health. 2019 Sep;109(9):1273-1279. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2019.305178. Epub 2019 Jul 18.