• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

鼓励器官捐献登记的初级保健干预措施:系统评价。

Primary care interventions to encourage organ donation registration: A systematic review.

机构信息

Institute of Health Research, University of Bedfordshire, Putteridge Bury, Hitchin Road, Luton LU2 8LE, United Kingdom.

Institute of Health Research, University of Bedfordshire, Putteridge Bury, Hitchin Road, Luton LU2 8LE, United Kingdom.

出版信息

Transplant Rev (Orlando). 2017 Oct;31(4):268-275. doi: 10.1016/j.trre.2017.08.006. Epub 2017 Sep 2.

DOI:10.1016/j.trre.2017.08.006
PMID:28951124
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Previous research has proposed that primary care interventions to increase organ donation rates can help address the discrepancy between organ donation rates and the number of patients awaiting transplant. However, no systematic review has been conducted to examine interventions in this setting.

OBJECTIVE

To synthesise evidence from previous organ donation interventions conducted in a primary care setting.

METHODS

Six databases and grey literature were systematically searched between November 2016 and July 2017. Inclusion criteria included English language, studies published after the year 2000 and unpublished studies. A quality assessment and narrative synthesis was conducted.

RESULTS

Ten studies met the inclusion criteria, nine of which examined actual organ donor registration as their primary outcome. Eight interventions increased registration to be an organ donor. Successful interventions utilised active methods of participant engagement that encouraged donation at the point of patient contact.

DISCUSSION

Despite the small pool of studies that met the inclusion criteria, the results suggest that primary care interventions could produce promising results for increasing organ donation registration. However, additional higher quality studies are required before firm conclusions can be made. Barriers to implementation were also found and suggest that the feasibility of a primary care environment for organ donation intervention should be investigated.

摘要

背景

先前的研究提出,增加器官捐献率的初级保健干预措施有助于解决器官捐献率与等待移植的患者人数之间的差距。然而,尚未进行系统评价来检查这一背景下的干预措施。

目的

综合初级保健环境中以往器官捐献干预措施的证据。

方法

2016 年 11 月至 2017 年 7 月,系统地在六个数据库和灰色文献中进行了检索。纳入标准包括英语、2000 年后发表的研究以及未发表的研究。进行了质量评估和叙述性综合。

结果

符合纳入标准的研究有 10 项,其中 9 项将实际器官捐献登记作为其主要结局进行了研究。8 项干预措施增加了器官捐献登记。成功的干预措施采用了积极的参与者参与方法,鼓励在患者接触点捐献。

讨论

尽管符合纳入标准的研究数量很少,但结果表明初级保健干预措施可能会对增加器官捐献登记产生有希望的结果。然而,在得出明确结论之前,还需要更多高质量的研究。还发现了实施的障碍,这表明应调查初级保健环境是否适合进行器官捐献干预。

相似文献

1
Primary care interventions to encourage organ donation registration: A systematic review.鼓励器官捐献登记的初级保健干预措施:系统评价。
Transplant Rev (Orlando). 2017 Oct;31(4):268-275. doi: 10.1016/j.trre.2017.08.006. Epub 2017 Sep 2.
2
Interventions for increasing solid organ donor registration.增加实体器官捐献者登记的干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Apr 4;4(4):CD10829. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010829.pub2.
3
A systematic review of presumed consent systems for deceased organ donation.对已故器官捐赠的推定同意系统的系统评价。
Health Technol Assess. 2009 May;13(26):iii, ix-xi, 1-95. doi: 10.3310/hta13260.
4
Survivor, family and professional experiences of psychosocial interventions for sexual abuse and violence: a qualitative evidence synthesis.性虐待和暴力的心理社会干预的幸存者、家庭和专业人员的经验:定性证据综合。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Oct 4;10(10):CD013648. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013648.pub2.
5
Interventions for promoting habitual exercise in people living with and beyond cancer.促进癌症患者及康复者进行习惯性锻炼的干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Sep 19;9(9):CD010192. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010192.pub3.
6
Interventions targeted at women to encourage the uptake of cervical screening.针对女性的干预措施,以鼓励她们接受宫颈癌筛查。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Sep 6;9(9):CD002834. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD002834.pub3.
7
Strategies to improve smoking cessation rates in primary care.提高初级保健中戒烟率的策略。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Sep 6;9(9):CD011556. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011556.pub2.
8
The measurement and monitoring of surgical adverse events.手术不良事件的测量与监测
Health Technol Assess. 2001;5(22):1-194. doi: 10.3310/hta5220.
9
Home treatment for mental health problems: a systematic review.心理健康问题的居家治疗:一项系统综述
Health Technol Assess. 2001;5(15):1-139. doi: 10.3310/hta5150.
10
Eliciting adverse effects data from participants in clinical trials.从临床试验参与者中获取不良反应数据。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Jan 16;1(1):MR000039. doi: 10.1002/14651858.MR000039.pub2.

引用本文的文献

1
Latent Profiles of Deceased Organ Donation Registrants and Nonregistrants in the United States.美国已故器官捐赠登记者和非登记者的潜在概况。
J Transplant. 2025 Jul 18;2025:4446435. doi: 10.1155/joot/4446435. eCollection 2025.
2
Organ Donation: Behaviour and Beliefs in Sweden.器官捐赠:瑞典的行为与观念
SAGE Open Nurs. 2024 May 24;10:23779608241257011. doi: 10.1177/23779608241257011. eCollection 2024 Jan-Dec.
3
Evaluation of liver transplantation services in Kazakhstan from 2012 to 2023.2012年至2023年哈萨克斯坦肝脏移植服务评估
Sci Rep. 2024 Apr 23;14(1):9304. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-60086-7.
4
Interventions for increasing solid organ donor registration.增加实体器官捐献者登记的干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Apr 4;4(4):CD10829. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010829.pub2.
5
Promoting deceased organ and tissue donation registration in family physician waiting rooms (RegisterNow-1): a pragmatic stepped-wedge, cluster randomized controlled registry trial.在家庭医生候诊室推广已故器官和组织捐献登记(RegisterNow-1):一项实用的阶梯式、群组随机对照登记试验。
BMC Med. 2022 Mar 3;20(1):75. doi: 10.1186/s12916-022-02266-8.
6
Attitudes and acceptability of organ and tissue donation registration in the emergency department: a national survey of emergency physicians.急诊科医师对器官和组织捐献登记的态度和可接受性:一项全国性调查。
CJEM. 2022 Apr;24(3):293-299. doi: 10.1007/s43678-022-00262-8. Epub 2022 Feb 6.
7
Improving access to organ donor registration in general practice: a feasibility study.提高普通实践中器官捐献登记的可及性:一项可行性研究。
Br J Gen Pract. 2020 Jun 25;70(696):e497-e504. doi: 10.3399/bjgp20X709601. Print 2020 Jul.
8
Research protocol: general practice organ donation intervention-a feasibility study (GPOD).研究方案:全科医疗器官捐赠干预——一项可行性研究(GPOD)
Pilot Feasibility Stud. 2018 Nov 12;4:171. doi: 10.1186/s40814-018-0362-9. eCollection 2018.