Liang Yi-Hsin, Shao Yu-Yun, Chen Ho-Min, Cheng Ann-Lii, Lai Mei-Shu, Yeh Kun-Huei
Graduate Institute of Oncology, College of Public Health, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan, R.O.C.
National Taiwan University Cancer Center, Taipei, Taiwan, R.O.C.
Anticancer Res. 2017 Dec;37(12):7095-7104. doi: 10.21873/anticanres.12183.
Although irinotecan and oxaliplatin are both standard treatments for advanced colon cancer, it remains unknown whether either is effective for patients with resectable synchronous colon cancer and liver-confined metastasis (SCCLM) after curative surgery.
A population-based cohort of patients diagnosed with de novo SCCLM between 2004 and 2009 was established by searching the database of the Taiwan Cancer Registry and the National Health Insurance Research Database of Taiwan. Patients who underwent curative surgery as their first therapy followed by chemotherapy doublets were classified into the irinotecan group or oxaliplatin group accordingly. Patients who received radiotherapy or did not receive chemotherapy doublets were excluded.
We included 6,533 patients with de novo stage IV colon cancer. Three hundred and nine of them received chemotherapy doublets after surgery; 77 patients received irinotecan and 232 patients received oxaliplatin as adjuvant chemotherapy. The patients in both groups exhibited similar overall survival (median: not reached vs. 40.8 months, p=0.151) and time to the next line of treatment (median: 16.5 vs. 14.3 months, p=0.349) in both univariate and multivariate analyses. Additionally, patients with resectable SCCLM had significantly shorter median overall survival than patients with stage III colon cancer who underwent curative surgery and subsequent adjuvant chemotherapy, but longer median overall survival than patients with de novo stage IV colon cancer who underwent surgery only at the primary site followed by standard systemic chemotherapy (p<0.001).
Irinotecan and oxaliplatin exhibited similar efficacy in patients who underwent curative surgery for resectable SCCLM.
尽管伊立替康和奥沙利铂都是晚期结肠癌的标准治疗方法,但对于可切除的同步性结肠癌合并肝转移(SCCLM)患者,在根治性手术后这两种药物是否有效仍不清楚。
通过检索台湾癌症登记数据库和台湾国民健康保险研究数据库,建立了一个基于人群的队列,纳入2004年至2009年间诊断为原发性SCCLM的患者。以根治性手术作为首次治疗,随后接受双药化疗的患者被相应分为伊立替康组或奥沙利铂组。接受放疗或未接受双药化疗的患者被排除。
我们纳入了6533例原发性IV期结肠癌患者。其中309例在术后接受了双药化疗;77例接受伊立替康,232例接受奥沙利铂作为辅助化疗。单因素和多因素分析显示,两组患者的总生存期(中位数:未达到 vs. 40.8个月,p = 0.151)和至下一线治疗时间(中位数:16.5 vs. 14.3个月,p = 0.349)相似。此外,可切除SCCLM患者的中位总生存期明显短于接受根治性手术及后续辅助化疗的III期结肠癌患者,但长于仅在原发部位接受手术并随后接受标准全身化疗的原发性IV期结肠癌患者(p < 0.001)。
对于可切除SCCLM患者,在接受根治性手术后,伊立替康和奥沙利铂显示出相似的疗效。