Medizinische Klinik und Poliklinik II, University Hospital Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany.
Public Health Wales Microbiology, Cardiff, United Kingdom.
J Clin Microbiol. 2018 Jan 24;56(2). doi: 10.1128/JCM.01655-17. Print 2018 Feb.
In patients with hematological malignancies, bronchoalveolar lavage fluid (BALF) specimens are commonly used for the diagnosis of mold infections. However, it is not clear whether the cell pellet (P) or the supernatant fraction (S) of the BALF specimen is optimal for molecular diagnostic testing. Thus, 99 BALF specimens were collected from 96 hematology patients with or without allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant. The cell pellets and supernatants were processed alone and in combination (S/P) for testing by two fungus-specific real-time PCR assays compliant with international recommendations. The results achieved with S/P were revealed to be superior in comparison to those achieved with S and P alone, with the use of each single fraction showing a reduced sensitivity for the detection of DNA (82% and 43% for S and P, respectively). In 57% of the samples, testing of the combination of S and P generated a lower quantification cycle value than testing of S or P alone. Molds would have been missed in 5 and 16 out of 28 samples if only S or P, respectively, was analyzed. No sample was positive by testing of S or P only. Similar results were obtained for the detection of Mucorales DNA in BALF specimens (reduced sensitivity of 67% and 50% for S and P, respectively). Study patients were categorized according to the current European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer/Mycoses Study Group classification for invasive fungal disease (IFD), revealing that 35 patients had proven/probable IFD (36%), 47 patients had possible IFD (49%), and 14 patients had undetermined IFD (15%).
在血液恶性肿瘤患者中,支气管肺泡灌洗液(BALF)标本常用于诊断霉菌感染。然而,目前尚不清楚BALF 标本的细胞沉淀(P)或上清液部分(S)更适合用于分子诊断检测。因此,我们收集了 96 例血液病患者的 99 份 BALF 标本,这些患者中有或无异基因造血干细胞移植。单独处理细胞沉淀和上清液,并结合(S/P)使用符合国际建议的两种真菌特异性实时 PCR 检测方法进行检测。结果显示,S/P 联合检测的结果优于单独使用 S 和 P 的结果,使用每种单一部分检测 DNA 的敏感性降低(S 和 P 分别为 82%和 43%)。在 57%的样本中,与单独检测 S 或 P 相比,检测 S 和 P 的组合会产生更低的定量循环值。如果仅分析 S 或 P,会错过 28 个样本中的 5 个和 16 个样本中的霉菌。仅通过检测 S 或 P 不会得到阳性样本。在 BALF 标本中检测毛霉目 DNA 也获得了类似的结果(S 和 P 的敏感性分别降低了 67%和 50%)。研究患者根据侵袭性真菌病(IFD)的欧洲癌症研究和治疗组织/真菌病研究组(EORTC/MSG)分类进行分类,结果显示 35 例患者有确诊/可能 IFD(36%),47 例患者有可能 IFD(49%),14 例患者有未确定 IFD(15%)。