• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Amoral, im/moral and dis/loyal: Children's moral status in child welfare.无道德、不道德与不忠:儿童福利中儿童的道德状况
Childhood. 2017 Nov;24(4):470-484. doi: 10.1177/0907568217711742. Epub 2017 Jun 8.
2
Children's Judgments of Epistemic and Moral Agents: From Situations to Intentions.儿童对认知和道德主体的判断:从情境到意图。
Perspect Psychol Sci. 2019 May;14(3):344-360. doi: 10.1177/1745691618805452. Epub 2019 Jan 10.
3
Epistemic struggles: The role of advocacy in promoting epistemic justice and rights in mental health.认知斗争:倡导在促进心理健康中的认知正义和权利中的作用。
Soc Sci Med. 2018 Dec;219:36-44. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2018.10.003. Epub 2018 Oct 10.
4
Stigma, epistemic injustice, and "looked after children": The need for a new language.污名化、认识正义缺失与“受照料儿童”:需要新的语言。
J Eval Clin Pract. 2022 Oct;28(5):867-874. doi: 10.1111/jep.13700. Epub 2022 May 22.
5
Children's attributions of moral and epistemic virtue: Effects on learning and memory.儿童对道德和认知美德的归因:对学习和记忆的影响。
Dev Psychol. 2022 Jun;58(6):1114-1127. doi: 10.1037/dev0001342. Epub 2022 Mar 24.
6
The construction of moral agency in mother-child conversations about helping and hurting across childhood and adolescence.在儿童和青少年时期,关于帮助和伤害的母子对话中道德代理的构建。
Dev Psychol. 2014 Jan;50(1):34-44. doi: 10.1037/a0033492. Epub 2013 Jun 24.
7
Epistemic Injustice and Illness.认知不公与疾病
J Appl Philos. 2017 Feb;34(2):172-190. doi: 10.1111/japp.12172. Epub 2016 Feb 8.
8
Epistemic injustice and responsibility in borderline personality disorder.边缘型人格障碍中的认知不公正与责任
J Eval Clin Pract. 2017 Oct;23(5):974-980. doi: 10.1111/jep.12609. Epub 2016 Aug 4.
9
The role of epistemic and social characteristics in children's selective trust: Three meta-analyses.认知和社会特征在儿童选择性信任中的作用:三项元分析。
Dev Sci. 2020 Mar;23(2):e12895. doi: 10.1111/desc.12895. Epub 2019 Sep 4.
10
Daily living with distress and enrichment: the moral experience of families with ventilator-assisted children at home.带着痛苦与充实生活:家中有使用呼吸机辅助的孩子的家庭的道德体验。
Pediatrics. 2006 Jan;117(1):e48-60. doi: 10.1542/peds.2005-0789.

引用本文的文献

1
Stigma, epistemic injustice, and "looked after children": The need for a new language.污名化、认识正义缺失与“受照料儿童”:需要新的语言。
J Eval Clin Pract. 2022 Oct;28(5):867-874. doi: 10.1111/jep.13700. Epub 2022 May 22.

本文引用的文献

1
Why does she leave? The leaving process(es) of battered women.她为何离开?受虐妇女的离开过程。
Health Care Women Int. 2008 Mar;29(3):200-26. doi: 10.1080/07399330801913802.
2
Delinquent boys, their parents and grandparents.违法犯罪的男孩、他们的父母和祖父母。
Acta Psychiatr Scand Suppl. 1967;195:1-264.

无道德、不道德与不忠:儿童福利中儿童的道德状况

Amoral, im/moral and dis/loyal: Children's moral status in child welfare.

作者信息

Knezevic Zlatana

机构信息

Mälardalen University, Sweden.

出版信息

Childhood. 2017 Nov;24(4):470-484. doi: 10.1177/0907568217711742. Epub 2017 Jun 8.

DOI:10.1177/0907568217711742
PMID:29187776
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5686788/
Abstract

This article is a discursive examination of children's status as knowledgeable moral agents within the Swedish child welfare system and in the widely used assessment framework BBIC. Departing from Fricker's concept of epistemic injustice, three discursive positions of children's moral status are identified: amoral, im/moral and dis/loyal. The findings show the undoubtedly moral child as largely missing and children's agency as diminished, deviant or rendered ambiguous. Epistemic injustice applies particularly to disadvantaged children with difficult experiences who run the risk of being othered, or positioned as reproducing or accommodating to the very same social problems they may be victimised by.

摘要

本文对瑞典儿童福利系统及广泛使用的评估框架BBIC中儿童作为有知识的道德主体的地位进行了论述性审视。从弗里克的认知不公正概念出发,确定了儿童道德地位的三种话语立场:不道德、非道德和不忠。研究结果表明,无疑具有道德的儿童在很大程度上缺失,儿童的能动性被削弱、偏离或变得模糊不清。认知不公正尤其适用于有困难经历的弱势儿童,他们有被边缘化的风险,或者被定位为在复制或适应他们可能成为受害者的社会问题。