Knezevic Zlatana
Mälardalen University, Sweden.
Childhood. 2017 Nov;24(4):470-484. doi: 10.1177/0907568217711742. Epub 2017 Jun 8.
This article is a discursive examination of children's status as knowledgeable moral agents within the Swedish child welfare system and in the widely used assessment framework BBIC. Departing from Fricker's concept of epistemic injustice, three discursive positions of children's moral status are identified: amoral, im/moral and dis/loyal. The findings show the undoubtedly moral child as largely missing and children's agency as diminished, deviant or rendered ambiguous. Epistemic injustice applies particularly to disadvantaged children with difficult experiences who run the risk of being othered, or positioned as reproducing or accommodating to the very same social problems they may be victimised by.
本文对瑞典儿童福利系统及广泛使用的评估框架BBIC中儿童作为有知识的道德主体的地位进行了论述性审视。从弗里克的认知不公正概念出发,确定了儿童道德地位的三种话语立场:不道德、非道德和不忠。研究结果表明,无疑具有道德的儿童在很大程度上缺失,儿童的能动性被削弱、偏离或变得模糊不清。认知不公正尤其适用于有困难经历的弱势儿童,他们有被边缘化的风险,或者被定位为在复制或适应他们可能成为受害者的社会问题。