Aldahak Nouman, Richter Bertram, Bemora Joseph Synèse, Keller Jeffery Thomas, Froelich Sebastien, Abdel Aziz Khaled Mohamed
Department of Neurosurgery, Allegheny General Hospital, Drexel University College of Medicine, 420 East North Avenue, Suite 302, Pittsburgh, PA, 15212, USA.
Department of Neurosurgery, Lariboisière Hospital, Assistance Publique, Hôpitaux de Paris, University of Paris VII-Diderot 2, Rue Ambroise Paré 75475 Paris Cedex 10, Paris, France.
Pan Afr Med J. 2017 Aug 14;27:277. doi: 10.11604/pamj.2017.27.277.12220. eCollection 2017.
We aim to establish a complete summary on the Endoscopic Endonasal Approach (EEA) to Cranio Cervical Junction (CCJ): evolution since first description, criteria to predict the feasibility and limitations, anatomical landmarks, indications and biomechanical evaluation after performing the approach. A comprehensive literature search to identify all available literature published between March 2002 and June 2015, the articles were divided into four categories according to their main purpose: 1- surgical technique, 2- anatomical landmarks and limitations, 3- literature reviews to identify main indications, 4- biomechanical studies. Thereafter, we demonstrate the approach step-by-step, using 1 fresh and 3 silicon injected embalmed cadaveric specimen heads. 61 articles and one poster were identified. The approach was first described on cadaveric study in 2002, and firstly used to perform odontoidectomy in 2005. The main indication is odontoid rheumatoid pannus and basilar invagination. The nasopalatine line (NPL), the superior nostril-hard palate Line (SN-HP), the naso-axial line (NAxL), the rhinopalatine Line (RPL) and other methods were described to predict the anatomical feasibility of the approach. The craniocervical fusion is potentially unnecessary after removal of < 75% of one occipital condyle. A recent cadaveric study stated the possibility of C1-C2 fusion via EEA. This paper reviews all available clinical and anatomical studies on the EEA to CCJ. The approach marked a significant evolution since its first description in 2002. Because of its lesser complications compared to the transoral approach, the EEA became when feasible, the approach of choice to the ventral CCJ.
我们旨在建立一份关于经鼻内镜入路(EEA)治疗颅颈交界区(CCJ)疾病的完整综述:自首次描述以来的发展历程、预测可行性和局限性的标准、解剖标志、适应证以及该入路术后的生物力学评估。通过全面的文献检索,以确定2002年3月至2015年6月期间发表的所有可用文献,这些文章根据其主要目的分为四类:1 - 手术技术;2 - 解剖标志和局限性;3 - 确定主要适应证的文献综述;4 - 生物力学研究。此后,我们使用1个新鲜和3个硅注射防腐尸体标本头部逐步演示该入路。共识别出61篇文章和1篇海报。该入路于2002年在尸体研究中首次被描述,并于2005年首次用于进行齿状突切除术。主要适应证是齿状突类风湿性血管翳和基底凹陷。描述了鼻腭线(NPL)、鼻孔 - 硬腭上线(SN - HP)、鼻轴线(NAxL)、鼻腭线(RPL)等方法来预测该入路的解剖可行性。切除小于75%的一个枕髁后,颅颈融合可能不必要。最近的一项尸体研究表明通过EEA进行C1 - C2融合的可能性。本文综述了所有关于EEA治疗CCJ疾病的可用临床和解剖学研究。自2002年首次描述以来,该入路有了显著发展。由于与经口入路相比并发症较少,EEA在可行时成为治疗腹侧CCJ疾病的首选入路。