Chamberlain Alyssa W, Gricius Matthew, Wallace Danielle M, Borjas Diana, Ware Vincent M
1 Arizona State University, Phoenix, USA.
Int J Offender Ther Comp Criminol. 2018 Aug;62(11):3581-3602. doi: 10.1177/0306624X17741593. Epub 2017 Nov 30.
Parole officers are an integral part of parolees' reentry process and success. Few studies, however, have examined whether the quality of the relationship between parolees and their parole officer influences outcomes such as recidivism. This study assesses how recidivism is affected by the quality of the relationship that parolees have with their parole officers. Using the Serious and Violent Offender Reentry Initiative (SVORI) dataset, we use parolees' perceptions of their relationship with their parole officer to determine whether they have established a positive or negative relationship, and whether these types of relationships differentially affect recidivism. Results show that parolees who have a negative relationship with their parole officer have higher rates of recidivism, while a positive relationship lowers parolees' likelihood of recidivating. An implication of this study emphasizes parole officer training that develops positive, high-quality relationships with parolees. Further implications are discussed below.
假释官是假释人员重新融入社会过程及成功与否的重要组成部分。然而,很少有研究探讨假释人员与其假释官之间关系的质量是否会影响诸如再次犯罪等结果。本研究评估假释人员与其假释官之间关系的质量如何影响再次犯罪。利用严重及暴力罪犯重新融入社会计划(SVORI)数据集,我们根据假释人员对其与假释官关系的认知来确定他们建立的是积极还是消极的关系,以及这些关系类型是否会对再次犯罪产生不同影响。结果表明,与假释官关系消极的假释人员再次犯罪率更高,而积极的关系则会降低假释人员再次犯罪的可能性。本研究的一个启示是强调对假释官进行培训,使其与假释人员建立积极、高质量的关系。下文将讨论进一步的启示。