Barra Steffen, Bessler Cornelia, Landolt Markus A, Aebi Marcel
1 University Hospital of Psychiatry, Zurich, Switzerland.
2 University of Zurich, Switzerland.
Sex Abuse. 2018 Oct;30(7):803-827. doi: 10.1177/1079063217697135. Epub 2017 Mar 20.
Juveniles who sexually offended (JSOs) are differentially burdened with adverse childhood experiences (ACEs). The present study used Latent Class Analysis (LCA) to derive subtypes of JSOs according to their patterns of 10 different ACEs. An extensive file analysis of 322 male JSOs ( M = 14.14, SD = 1.94) revealed five subtypes with (a) multiple (9.0%), (b) mainly family related (17.1%), (c) mainly peer related (21.7%), (d) mainly neglectful (18.6%), and (e) little/no (33.5%) ACEs. Differences among ACE subtypes with regard to several offense and victim characteristics (e.g., the use of penetration or violence, the choice of a child, a male, a stranger, or multiple victims) were examined. Whereas no differences were found for the use of physical violence or the choice of male, stranger, or multiple victims, binary logistic regressions revealed associations of the multiple-ACE subtype with the choice of a child victim, the family-ACE subtype with the use of penetration as well as further nonsexual delinquency, the peer-ACE subtype with the use of penetration and the choice of a child victim, and the neglect-subtype with the choice of a child victim. Additional analyses including single ACE categories instead of LCA-derived subtypes supported these results. Findings highlight the need for a comprehensive consideration of ACEs in research and clinical work to understand developmental pathways to juvenile sexual offending.
有性犯罪行为的青少年(JSOs)遭受不良童年经历(ACEs)的负担程度各不相同。本研究使用潜在类别分析(LCA),根据10种不同的ACEs模式,得出有性犯罪行为青少年的亚型。对322名男性有性犯罪行为青少年(M = 14.14,SD = 1.94)进行的广泛档案分析,揭示了五种亚型:(a)多种不良童年经历(9.0%),(b)主要与家庭相关(17.1%),(c)主要与同伴相关(21.7%),(d)主要是忽视型(18.6%),以及(e)很少或没有(33.5%)不良童年经历。研究考察了不良童年经历亚型在若干犯罪和受害者特征方面的差异(例如,是否使用插入或暴力、选择儿童、男性、陌生人或多名受害者)。虽然在身体暴力的使用或对男性、陌生人或多名受害者的选择方面未发现差异,但二元逻辑回归显示,多种不良童年经历亚型与选择儿童受害者有关,家庭不良童年经历亚型与使用插入行为以及进一步的非性犯罪有关,同伴不良童年经历亚型与使用插入行为和选择儿童受害者有关,忽视亚型与选择儿童受害者有关。包括单一不良童年经历类别而非潜在类别分析得出的亚型的额外分析支持了这些结果。研究结果强调,在研究和临床工作中需要全面考虑不良童年经历,以了解青少年性犯罪的发展路径。