Institute for Forensic Psychology and Psychiatry, Saarland University Hospital, 66421 Homburg, Germany.
Department of Psychology, Saarland University, 66123 Saarbruecken, Germany.
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023 Mar 15;20(6):5195. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20065195.
Adverse childhood experiences (ACEs) are common in community samples and are associated with various dysfunctional physical, psychological, and behavioral consequences. In this regard, criminal offenders are at specific risk, considering their elevated ACE rates compared with community samples and the associations of ACEs with criminal behaviors. However, assessing ACEs in offender samples by self-reports has been criticized with regard to their validity and reliability. We examined the suitability of ACE-self-reports using the Childhood Trauma Questionnaire (CTQ) in a sample of 231 male offenders involved in the German criminal justice system by comparing self-reported to externally rated ACEs to externally rated ACEs based on the information from the offenders' criminal and health-related files and on interviews conducted by forensically trained psychological/psychiatric experts. The accordance between self-ratings and expert ratings was examined considering mean differences, correlations, inter-rater agreement measures, and regression analyses. Offenders themselves reported a higher ACE burden than the one that was rated externally, but there was a strong relationship between CTQ self-assessments and external assessments. However, associations were stronger in offenders seen for risk assessment than in those evaluated for criminal responsibility. Overall, the CTQ seems suitable for use in forensic samples. However, reporting bias in self-reports of ACEs should be expected. Therefore, the combination of self-assessments and external assessments seems appropriate.
童年期不良经历(ACEs)在社区样本中很常见,并与各种功能失调的身体、心理和行为后果有关。在这方面,考虑到犯罪者的 ACE 发生率高于社区样本,以及 ACE 与犯罪行为的关联,他们面临着特殊的风险。然而,通过自我报告来评估犯罪者样本中的 ACE 受到了有效性和可靠性方面的批评。我们通过比较自我报告的 ACE 与基于犯罪者的犯罪和健康相关档案中的信息以及由法医训练的心理/精神病学专家进行的访谈来对外在评估的 ACE 进行评估,使用儿童期创伤问卷(CTQ)在一个由 231 名参与德国刑事司法系统的男性犯罪者样本中检验了 ACE 自我报告的适用性。我们考察了自我评估和专家评估之间的一致性,考虑了均值差异、相关性、评分者间一致性测量和回归分析。犯罪者本人报告的 ACE 负担高于外部评估的负担,但 CTQ 自我评估与外部评估之间存在很强的关系。然而,在进行风险评估的犯罪者中,关联比在评估刑事责任的犯罪者中更强。总的来说,CTQ 似乎适用于法医样本。然而,应该预期到 ACE 自我报告中的报告偏差。因此,自我评估和外部评估的结合似乎是合适的。