Timmerman Hans, Steegers Monique A H, Huygen Frank J P M, Goeman Jelle J, van Dasselaar Nick T, Schenkels Marcel J, Wilder-Smith Oliver H G, Wolff André P, Vissers Kris C P
Radboud university medical center, Department of Anesthesiology, Pain and Palliative Medicine, Nijmegen, the Netherlands.
ErasmusMC, Department of Anesthesiology, University Center of Pain Medicine, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
PLoS One. 2017 Nov 30;12(11):e0187961. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0187961. eCollection 2017.
Neuropathic pain is clinically described as pain caused by a lesion or disease of the somatosensory nervous system. The aim of this study was to assess the validity of the Dutch version of the DN4, in a cross-sectional multicentre design, as a screening tool for detecting a neuropathic pain component in a large consecutive, not pre-stratified on basis of the target outcome, population of patients with chronic pain. Patients' pain was classified by two independent (pain-)physicians as the gold standard. The analysis was initially performed on the outcomes of those patients (n = 228 out of 291) in whom both physicians agreed in their pain classification. Compared to the gold standard the DN4 had a sensitivity of 75% and specificity of 76%. The DN4-symptoms (seven interview items) solely resulted in a sensitivity of 70% and a specificity of 67%. For the DN4-signs (three examination items) it was respectively 75% and 75%. In conclusion, because it seems that the DN4 helps to identify a neuropathic pain component in a consecutive population of patients with chronic pain in a moderate way, a comprehensive (physical-) examination by the physician is still obligate.
神经性疼痛在临床上被描述为由躯体感觉神经系统的损伤或疾病引起的疼痛。本研究的目的是在一项横断面多中心设计中,评估荷兰版DN4作为一种筛查工具在检测一大组连续的慢性疼痛患者(未根据目标结果进行预先分层)中神经性疼痛成分的有效性。由两名独立的(疼痛)医生对患者的疼痛进行分类作为金标准。最初对两名医生在疼痛分类上达成一致的患者(291名中的228名)的结果进行分析。与金标准相比,DN4的敏感性为75%,特异性为76%。仅DN4症状(七个访谈项目)的敏感性为70%,特异性为67%。对于DN4体征(三个检查项目),敏感性和特异性分别为75%和75%。总之,由于DN4似乎有助于以中等程度识别连续的慢性疼痛患者群体中的神经性疼痛成分,因此医生进行全面的(体格)检查仍然是必要的。