Suppr超能文献

鱼际和小鱼际皮瓣供区并发症分析

Donor-Site Morbidity Analysis of Thenar and Hypothenar Flap.

作者信息

Chul Lee Dong, Hyung Lee Ho, Hoon Koh Sung, Soo Kim Jin, Young Roh Si, Jin Lee Kyung

机构信息

Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Gwangmyeong Sungae General Hospital, Gwangmyeong, Republic of Korea.

出版信息

Arch Plast Surg. 2024 Feb 7;51(1):94-101. doi: 10.1055/a-2168-4771. eCollection 2024 Jan.

Abstract

For the small glabrous skin defect, Thenar and Hypothenar skin are useful donors and they have been used as a free flap. Because of similar skin characteristics, both flaps have same indications. We will conduct comparative study for the donor morbidity of the Free thenar flap and Hypothenar free flap.  From January 2011 to December 2021, demographic data, characteristics of each flap, and complications using retrospective chart review were obtained. Donor outcomes of the patient, who had been followed up for more than 6 months, were measured using photographic analysis and physical examination. General pain was assessed by Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) score, neuropathic pain was assessed by Douleur Neuropathique 4 Questions (DN4) score, scar appearance was assessed by modified Vancouver Scar Scale (mVSS), and patient satisfaction was assessed on a 3-point scale. Statistical analysis was performed on the outcomes.  Out of the 39 survey respondents, 17 patients received Free thenar flaps, and 22 patients received Hypothenar free flaps. Thenar group had higher NRS, DN4, and mVSS (  < 0.05). The average scores for the Thenar and Hypothenar groups were 1.35 and 0.27 for NRS, 2.41 and 0.55 for DN4, and 3.12 and 1.59 for mVSS, respectively. Despite the Hypothenar group showing greater satisfaction on the 3-point scale (1.82) compared with the Thenar group (1.47), the difference was not significant (  = 0.085). Linear regression analysis indicated that flap width did not have a notable impact on the outcome measures, and multiple linear regression analysis revealed no significant interaction between flap width and each of the outcome measures.  Despite the limited number of participants, higher donor morbidity in general pain, neuropathic pain, and scar formation was noted in the Thenar free flap compared with the Hypothenar free flap. However, no difference in overall patient satisfaction was found between the two groups.

摘要

对于小面积无毛皮肤缺损,大鱼际和小鱼际皮肤是有用的供区,且已被用作游离皮瓣。由于皮肤特性相似,两种皮瓣具有相同的适应证。我们将对游离大鱼际皮瓣和游离小鱼际皮瓣的供区并发症进行比较研究。

2011年1月至2021年12月,通过回顾性病历审查获取人口统计学数据、各皮瓣的特征及并发症。对随访超过6个月的患者的供区结局进行照片分析和体格检查。采用数字评分量表(NRS)评分评估一般疼痛,采用神经病理性疼痛4项问题(DN4)评分评估神经性疼痛,采用改良温哥华瘢痕量表(mVSS)评估瘢痕外观,采用3分制评估患者满意度。对结局进行统计分析。

在39名调查对象中,17例患者接受了游离大鱼际皮瓣,22例患者接受了游离小鱼际皮瓣。大鱼际组的NRS、DN4和mVSS更高(P<0.05)。大鱼际组和小鱼际组的NRS平均评分分别为1.35和0.27,DN4平均评分分别为2.41和0.55,mVSS平均评分分别为3.12和1.59。尽管小鱼际组在3分制上的满意度(1.82)高于大鱼际组(1.47),但差异不显著(P=0.085)。线性回归分析表明皮瓣宽度对结局指标没有显著影响,多元线性回归分析显示皮瓣宽度与各结局指标之间无显著交互作用。

尽管参与者数量有限,但与游离小鱼际皮瓣相比,游离大鱼际皮瓣在一般疼痛、神经性疼痛和瘢痕形成方面的供区并发症更高。然而,两组患者的总体满意度没有差异。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8e1f/10901602/1a3a373d8afe/10-1055-a-2168-4771-i23apr0308oa-1.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验