• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

[墨西哥国立自治大学医学院本科医学实习阶段的教学能力水平]

[Level of teaching competence at the Undergraduate Medical Internship of UNAM's Faculty of Medicine].

作者信息

Martínez-González Adrián, Lifshitz-Guinzberg Alberto, González-Quintanilla Eduardo, Monterrosas-Rojas Ana María, Flores-Hernández Fernando, Gatica-Lara Florina, Martínez-Franco Adrián Israel, Sánchez-Mendiola Melchor

机构信息

Facultad de Medicina, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Ciudad de México, México

出版信息

Rev Med Inst Mex Seguro Soc. 2017 Nov-Dec;55(6):778-787.

PMID:29190872
Abstract

BACKGROUND

There is no systematic evaluation of teaching performance in the clinical area at UNAM Faculty of Medicine. The study purpose is to assess the teaching competence level in the Undergraduate Medical Internship (UMI).

METHODS

The paper describes the process of psychometric validity for the instrument designed to evaluate teaching competence in the UMI. This instrument was constructed from two previously developed instruments. The final version with 54 items in a Likert scale was studied with exploratory factorial analysis. Four dimensions were obtained: Solution of clinical problems, Psychopedagogy, Mentoring, and Evaluation. The instrument had a reliability of 0.994, with an explained variance of 77.75%.

RESULTS

To evaluate the teaching competence level, we administered 844 questionnaires to a sample of students with a response rate of 89%. We obtained an overall global score of 89.4 ± 9.6 (mean ± SD). The dimension Solution of clinical problems was the one with a greater value, in contrast with the dimension of Evaluation, which had a lower score.

CONCLUSION

The teachers of the UMI are considered educators with high level of teaching competence, according to the perceptions of the undergraduate internal doctors. The evaluation of teaching competence level is very important for institutions that look for the continuous professional development of its faculty.

摘要

背景

墨西哥国立自治大学医学院尚未对临床领域的教学表现进行系统评估。本研究旨在评估本科医学实习(UMI)中的教学能力水平。

方法

本文描述了用于评估UMI教学能力的工具的心理测量效度过程。该工具由之前开发的两个工具构建而成。对最终版本的54个李克特量表项目进行探索性因子分析研究。得到四个维度:临床问题解决、心理教育学、指导和评估。该工具的信度为0.994,解释方差为77.75%。

结果

为评估教学能力水平,我们向学生样本发放了844份问卷,回复率为89%。我们得到的总体全球评分为89.4±9.6(均值±标准差)。临床问题解决维度得分最高,而评估维度得分较低。

结论

根据本科实习医生的看法,UMI的教师被认为是教学能力水平较高的教育工作者。对教学能力水平进行评估对于寻求教师持续专业发展的机构非常重要。

相似文献

1
[Level of teaching competence at the Undergraduate Medical Internship of UNAM's Faculty of Medicine].[墨西哥国立自治大学医学院本科医学实习阶段的教学能力水平]
Rev Med Inst Mex Seguro Soc. 2017 Nov-Dec;55(6):778-787.
2
Analysis of psychometric properties of the modified SETQ tool in undergraduate medical education.本科医学教育中改良版SETQ工具的心理测量特性分析
BMC Med Educ. 2017 Mar 16;17(1):56. doi: 10.1186/s12909-017-0893-4.
3
Development and psychometric characteristics of a new domain of the stanford faculty development program instrument.斯坦福教师发展项目工具新领域的开发及心理测量学特征
J Contin Educ Health Prof. 2014 Winter;34(1):13-24. doi: 10.1002/chp.21213.
4
Evaluation in undergraduate medical education: Conceptualizing and validating a novel questionnaire for assessing the quality of bedside teaching.本科医学教育评估:评估床边教学质量的新型问卷的概念化和验证。
Med Teach. 2017 Aug;39(8):820-827. doi: 10.1080/0142159X.2017.1324136. Epub 2017 May 22.
5
Setting standards for teaching evaluation data: an application of the contrasting groups method.制定教学评估数据标准:对比组方法的应用。
Teach Learn Med. 2009 Apr-Jun;21(2):82-6. doi: 10.1080/10401330902791222.
6
What makes a good teacher? Lessons from teaching medical students.怎样成为一名优秀教师?来自医学生教学的经验教训。
Acad Med. 2001 Aug;76(8):809-10. doi: 10.1097/00001888-200108000-00011.
7
Evaluation of large-group lectures in medicine - development of the SETMED-L (Student Evaluation of Teaching in MEDical Lectures) questionnaire.医学大课评估 - SETMED-L(学生对医学讲座教学评估)问卷的制定。
BMC Med Educ. 2017 Aug 18;17(1):137. doi: 10.1186/s12909-017-0970-8.
8
[Teacher's perfomance assessment in Family Medicine specialization].[家庭医学专业教师绩效评估]
Rev Med Inst Mex Seguro Soc. 2016 Sep-Oct;54(5):612-9.
9
Factorial validation of a widely disseminated educational framework for evaluating clinical teachers.对一个广泛传播的用于评估临床教师的教育框架进行因素验证。
Acad Med. 1998 Jun;73(6):688-95. doi: 10.1097/00001888-199806000-00016.
10
Evaluation of surgical faculty and surgical undergraduate teaching.外科教员及外科本科教学评估
Can J Surg. 1985 Jul;28(4):351-4.