Martínez-González Adrián, Gómez-Clavelina Francisco J, Hernández-Torres Isaías, Flores-Hernández Fernando, Sánchez-Mendiola Melchor
Secretaría de Educación Médica, Facultad de Medicina, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Ciudad de México, México.
Rev Med Inst Mex Seguro Soc. 2016 Sep-Oct;54(5):612-9.
In Mexico there is no systematic evaluation of teachers in medical specialties. It is difficult to identify appropriate teaching practices. The lack of evaluation has limited the recognition and improvement of teaching. The objective of this study was to analyze feedback from students about teaching activities of teachers-tutors responsible for the specialization course in family medicine, and evaluate the evidence of reliability and validity of the instrument applied online.
It was an observational and cross-sectional study. Seventy eight teachers of Family Medicine of medical residency were evaluated by 734 resident´s opinion. The anonymous questionnaire to assess teaching performance by resident's opinion and it is composed of 5 dimensions using a Likert scale. Descriptive and inferential statistics (t test, one-way ANOVA and factor analysis) were used.
Residents stated that teaching performance is acceptable, with an average of 4.25 ± 0.93. The best valued dimension was "Methodology" with an average of 4.34 ± .92 in contrast to the "assessment" dimension with 4.16 ± 1.04.
Teachers of specialization in family medicine have acceptable performance by resident's opinion. The online assessment tool meets the criteria of validity and reliability.
在墨西哥，医学专业没有对教师进行系统评估。难以确定合适的教学实践。缺乏评估限制了对教学的认可和改进。本研究的目的是分析学生对负责家庭医学专科课程的教师-导师教学活动的反馈，并评估在线应用工具的可靠性和有效性证据。
这是一项观察性横断面研究。734名住院医师对78名家庭医学住院医师教师进行了评价。通过住院医师意见评估教学表现的匿名问卷由5个维度组成，采用李克特量表。使用了描述性和推断性统计（t检验、单因素方差分析和因子分析）。
住院医师表示教学表现可以接受，平均分为4.25±0.93。评价最高的维度是“方法”，平均分为4.34±0.92，而“评估”维度平均分为4.16±1.04。
根据住院医师的意见，家庭医学专科教师的表现可以接受。在线评估工具符合有效性和可靠性标准。
