Crook Joan, Weir Robin, Tunks Eldon
McMaster University, Faculty of Health Sciences, Hamilton, Ont. L8N 3Z5 Canada.
Pain. 1989 Jan;36(1):49-61. doi: 10.1016/0304-3959(89)90111-5.
The course and prognosis of persistent pain are largely unknown. In addition, follow-up studies of chronic pain sufferers have come from specialized pain clinics and have ignored the question of how representative this special group is to the general population who suffer persistent pain. Because health care planners are assumed to require these data for projection of health care needs, it is important to determine the course of persistent pain in those persistent pain sufferers in the general population as well as those referred to a specialty clinic. An epidemiological study compared 2 groups of self-reported persistent pain sufferers from a Family Practice Clinic and a Specialty Pain Clinic over a 2 year period. All subjects reporting a persistent problem with pain at the time of the initial survey were contacted 2 years later to determine whether the initial differences between the 2 groups remained constant over time and whether there were any changes within each group over time. Despite the similarities between the study groups on multiple socioeconomic and demographic variables, the Specialty Pain Clinic group remained distinctly different from the Family Practice pain sufferers on many pain behavior and emotional variables. Thirteen percent of the persistent pain sufferers from the Pain Clinic group and 36% of the persistent pain sufferers from the Family Practice group no longer reported pain as a problem at follow-up. Of those pain sufferers from either group who continued to experience pain at 2 years follow-up, their pain became more intermittent, psychological distress factors improved, and the use of health services decreased. The implications are that persistent pain does not necessarily continue forever and that persistent pain sufferers in the general population have a better prognosis than those who are referred to a Specialty Pain Clinic. All follow-up studies need to be interpreted in light of these findings.
持续性疼痛的病程和预后在很大程度上尚不清楚。此外,对慢性疼痛患者的随访研究来自专门的疼痛诊所,并且忽略了这个特殊群体对遭受持续性疼痛的普通人群的代表性问题。由于假定医疗保健规划者需要这些数据来预测医疗保健需求,因此确定普通人群中持续性疼痛患者以及转诊至专科诊所的患者的持续性疼痛病程非常重要。一项流行病学研究在两年时间内比较了来自家庭医疗诊所和专科疼痛诊所的两组自我报告的持续性疼痛患者。在初始调查时报告有持续性疼痛问题的所有受试者在两年后被联系以确定两组之间的初始差异是否随时间保持不变,以及每组内部随时间是否有任何变化。尽管研究组在多个社会经济和人口统计学变量上存在相似之处,但专科疼痛诊所组在许多疼痛行为和情绪变量上与家庭医疗疼痛患者仍有明显差异。疼痛诊所组中13%的持续性疼痛患者和家庭医疗组中36%的持续性疼痛患者在随访时不再将疼痛报告为问题。在两组中那些在两年随访时仍持续经历疼痛的患者中,他们的疼痛变得更加间歇性,心理困扰因素有所改善,并且医疗服务的使用减少。这意味着持续性疼痛不一定会永远持续下去,并且普通人群中的持续性疼痛患者的预后比转诊至专科疼痛诊所的患者更好。所有随访研究都需要根据这些发现进行解读。