评价新加坡以初级保健为主导的综合痴呆症共病管理计划:一项有效性和成本效益研究。
Evaluation of an integrated primary care-led dementia shared care program in Singapore: An effectiveness and cost-effectiveness study.
机构信息
Department of Health Services and Outcomes Research, National Healthcare Group, Singapore, Singapore.
Formerly from Health Services and Outcomes Research, National Healthcare Group, Singapore, Singapore.
出版信息
Geriatr Gerontol Int. 2018 Mar;18(3):479-486. doi: 10.1111/ggi.13196. Epub 2017 Nov 28.
AIM
With an aging Singapore population, there is an increasing demand for dementia care. The present study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of the Primary Care Dementia Clinic (PCDC) in comparison with the Memory Clinic (MC; hospital-based) and other polyclinics.
METHODS
A quasi-experimental design was implemented. Effectiveness of PCDC was assessed through caregiver satisfaction, quality of life (caregiver-rated) and adverse events rates. Quality-of-Life measures using the EuroQol 5 Dimension Questionnaire (EQ-5D) at baseline, 6 months and 12 months was assessed. Costs were calculated from a societal perspective. The incremental cost-effectiveness of the PCDC was compared with MC and other polyclinics.
RESULTS
The present study showed that quality of life and the rate of adverse events at 12 months were similar between the three groups. Caregiver satisfaction at 12 months was higher in the PCDC group when compared with other polyclinics. There were no observed differences in societal cost between the three groups. At 6-month follow up, direct medical costs for PCDC were significantly lower that of other polyclinics. At 12-month follow up, PCDC patients had higher Quality Adjusted Life Years (QALYs) compared with the MC group.
CONCLUSION
PCDC provided effective care, similar to care at MC and better than care at other polyclinics. Caregiver satisfaction was higher for the PCDC group, and PCDC patients had lower direct medical costs at 6-month follow up. Given these findings, adopting a PCDC model in other polyclinics in Singapore can be beneficial for optimal right siting of patients. Geriatr Gerontol Int 2018; 18: 479-486.
目的
随着新加坡人口老龄化,对痴呆症护理的需求不断增加。本研究旨在评估初级保健痴呆症诊所(PCDC)与记忆诊所(MC;医院为基础)和其他综合诊所相比的有效性和成本效益。
方法
采用准实验设计。通过护理人员满意度、生活质量(护理人员评定)和不良事件发生率评估 PCDC 的有效性。在基线、6 个月和 12 个月时使用 EuroQol 5 维度问卷(EQ-5D)评估生活质量。从社会角度计算成本。比较 PCDC 与 MC 和其他综合诊所的增量成本效益。
结果
本研究表明,三组患者在 12 个月时的生活质量和不良事件发生率相似。与其他综合诊所相比,PCDC 组的护理人员满意度在 12 个月时更高。三组之间的社会成本没有差异。在 6 个月随访时,PCDC 的直接医疗费用明显低于其他综合诊所。在 12 个月随访时,PCDC 患者的健康调整生命年(QALYs)高于 MC 组。
结论
PCDC 提供了有效的护理,与 MC 的护理相似,优于其他综合诊所的护理。PCDC 组的护理人员满意度更高,并且在 6 个月随访时,PCDC 患者的直接医疗费用更低。鉴于这些发现,在新加坡的其他综合诊所采用 PCDC 模式可以有利于为患者提供最佳的就诊地点。老年医学杂志 2018; 18: 479-486。