Division of Urology and Nephrology, Department of Research, Connecticut Children's Medical Center, Hartford, CT, USA.
Institute of Urology, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
J Pediatr Urol. 2018 Apr;14(2):158.e1-158.e7. doi: 10.1016/j.jpurol.2017.10.008. Epub 2017 Nov 29.
INTRODUCTION/BACKGROUND: Metachronous contralateral inguinal hernias (MCH) occur in approximately 10% of pediatric patients following unilateral inguinal hernia repairs (UIHR). Laparoscopic evaluation of the contralateral internal ring is a method of identifying high-risk individuals for prophylactic contralateral exploration and repair.
The objective of this study was to assess variation in utilization of diagnostic laparoscopy, and report costs associated with the evaluation of a contralateral patent processus vaginalis during hernia repair in pediatric hospitals.
The Pediatric Health Information System database was searched to identify outpatient surgical encounters for pediatric patients with a diagnosis of inguinal hernia during a 1-year period (2014). Records were identified that contained diagnostic codes for unilateral or bilateral inguinal hernia in combination with a procedure code for open hernia repair with or without diagnostic laparoscopy.
After exclusions there were 3952 hernia repairs performed at 30 hospitals; median age was 4 years (IQR 1-7), 78.8% were male, and 64.9% Caucasian. Three-quarters (76.7%) had UIHR, 8.6% had unilateral repairs with laparoscopy (UIHRL), 12.2% had bilateral inguinal hernia repairs (BIHR), and 2.4% had bilateral repairs with laparoscopy (BIHRL). Where laparoscopy was used, 78% resulted in a unilateral repair and 22% in a bilateral procedure. The percent of patients undergoing laparoscopy varied from 0 to 57% among hospitals, and 0-100% among surgeons. Pediatric surgeons were more than three times more likely to perform a diagnostic laparoscopy compared with pediatric urologists. Median adjusted costs were $2298 (IQR 1659-2955) for UIHR, $2713 (IQR 1873-3409) for UIHRL, $2752 (IQR 2230-3411) for BIHR, and $2783 (IQR 2233-3453) for BIHRL. Median costs varied over two-fold among hospitals ($1310-4434), and over four-fold among surgeons ($948-5040).
Data suggested that <10% of patients with clinically unilateral inguinal hernias developed MCH. A negative diagnostic laparoscopy ensured that 0.9-1.31% developed MCH. However, up to 30% of patients underwent contralateral exploration/repair when diagnostic laparoscopy was used. The current study found increased costs associated with the use of laparoscopy, with considerable variation in costs among surgeons and hospitals. These data elucidate competing financial and clinical consequences associated with the use of diagnostic laparoscopy with clinically unilateral hernias.
Variation existed in the use of laparoscopy during inguinal hernia repairs and associated costs within the current sample from children's hospitals in the United States. The additional costs of laparoscopic evaluation must be considered against the clinical utility and therapeutic consequences of identifying individuals with a higher risk of metachronous contralateral inguinal hernia.
引言/背景:在单侧腹股沟疝修补术后,约 10%的小儿患者会出现对侧腹股沟疝(MCH)。腹腔镜评估对侧内环是识别预防性对侧探查和修补高风险个体的一种方法。
本研究的目的是评估诊断性腹腔镜检查的应用差异,并报告在小儿医院疝修补术中评估对侧未闭鞘突管的相关成本。
使用小儿健康信息系统数据库,在 1 年内(2014 年),检索了门诊手术中诊断为腹股沟疝的小儿患者的记录。记录中包含单侧或双侧腹股沟疝的诊断代码,以及开放性疝修补术的手术代码,无论是否进行诊断性腹腔镜检查。
排除后,30 家医院共进行了 3952 例疝修补术;中位年龄为 4 岁(IQR 1-7),78.8%为男性,64.9%为白种人。75%为单侧腹股沟疝修补术(UIHR),8.6%为单侧疝修补术联合腹腔镜(UIHRL),12.2%为双侧腹股沟疝修补术(BIHR),2.4%为双侧疝修补术联合腹腔镜(BIHRL)。在进行腹腔镜检查的患者中,78%的患者进行了单侧修补,22%的患者进行了双侧手术。各医院腹腔镜检查的使用率从 0%到 57%不等,各外科医生的使用率从 0%到 100%不等。与小儿泌尿科医生相比,小儿外科医生行诊断性腹腔镜检查的可能性高出三倍以上。UIHR 的中位调整后费用为 2298 美元(IQR 1659-2955),UIHRL 为 2713 美元(IQR 1873-3409),BIHR 为 2752 美元(IQR 2230-3411),BIHRL 为 2783 美元(IQR 2233-3453)。各医院的中位费用差异超过两倍(1310-4434 美元),各外科医生的差异超过四倍(948-5040 美元)。
数据表明,<10%的单侧腹股沟疝患儿出现对侧 MCH。阴性的诊断性腹腔镜检查可确保 0.9-1.31%的患者出现 MCH。然而,当使用腹腔镜检查时,多达 30%的患者进行了对侧探查/修复。本研究发现,腹腔镜检查的使用会带来更高的成本,而且外科医生和医院之间的成本差异很大。这些数据阐明了与在临床上单侧疝中使用诊断性腹腔镜检查相关的财务和临床后果之间的竞争。
在美国儿童医院的当前样本中,在腹股沟疝修补术中使用腹腔镜检查及其相关成本方面存在差异。必须考虑腹腔镜评估的额外成本,同时还要考虑识别具有更高发生对侧腹股沟疝风险的个体的临床实用性和治疗后果。