Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of California, Irvine, Irvine, CA 92697.
Department of Developmental and Cell Biology, University of California, Irvine, Irvine, CA 92697.
CBE Life Sci Educ. 2017 Winter;16(4). doi: 10.1187/cbe.17-02-0032.
Recent calls for improvement in undergraduate education within STEM (science, technology, engineering, and mathematics) disciplines are hampered by the methods used to evaluate teaching effectiveness. Faculty members at research universities are commonly assessed and promoted mainly on the basis of research success. To improve the quality of undergraduate teaching across all disciplines, not only STEM fields, requires creating an environment wherein continuous improvement of teaching is valued, assessed, and rewarded at various stages of a faculty member's career. This requires consistent application of policies that reflect well-established best practices for evaluating teaching at the department, college, and university levels. Evidence shows most teaching evaluation practices do not reflect stated policies, even when the policies specifically espouse teaching as a value. Thus, alignment of practice to policy is a major barrier to establishing a culture in which teaching is valued. Situated in the context of current national efforts to improve undergraduate STEM education, including the Association of American Universities Undergraduate STEM Education Initiative, this essay discusses four guiding principles for aligning practice with stated priorities in formal policies: 1) enhancing the role of deans and chairs; 2) effectively using the hiring process; 3) improving communication; and 4) improving the understanding of teaching as a scholarly activity. In addition, three specific examples of efforts to improve the practice of evaluating teaching are presented as examples: 1) Three Bucket Model of merit review at the University of California, Irvine; (2) Evaluation of Teaching Rubric, University of Kansas; and (3) Teaching Quality Framework, University of Colorado, Boulder. These examples provide flexible criteria to holistically evaluate and improve the quality of teaching across the diverse institutions comprising modern higher education.
最近,呼吁在 STEM(科学、技术、工程和数学)学科的本科生教育中进行改进,但受到评估教学效果的方法的阻碍。研究型大学的教师通常主要根据研究成果来评估和晋升。为了提高所有学科(不仅是 STEM 领域)的本科教学质量,需要创造一个环境,在教师职业生涯的各个阶段,持续改进教学都受到重视、评估和奖励。这需要一致应用政策,这些政策反映了部门、学院和大学层面评估教学的既定最佳实践。有证据表明,大多数教学评估实践都没有反映既定政策,即使政策明确主张教学是一种价值观。因此,实践与政策的一致性是建立重视教学的文化的主要障碍。本文立足于当前提高本科生 STEM 教育的国家努力的背景,包括美国大学协会本科生 STEM 教育倡议,讨论了将实践与正式政策中的既定优先事项保持一致的四项指导原则:1)增强院长和系主任的作用;2)有效利用招聘过程;3)改善沟通;4)提高对教学作为一种学术活动的理解。此外,还提出了三个具体的教学评估实践改进的例子:1)加州大学欧文分校的 merit review 的“三桶模型”;2)堪萨斯大学的教学评估纲要;3)科罗拉多大学博尔德分校的教学质量框架。这些例子为在构成现代高等教育的多样化机构中全面评估和提高教学质量提供了灵活的标准。