Section for Sports Science, Department of Public Health, Aarhus University, Dalgas Avenue 4, 8000, Aarhus C, Denmark.
Center for Health and Performance, Department of Food and Nutrition and Sport Science, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden.
Eur J Appl Physiol. 2018 Feb;118(2):303-312. doi: 10.1007/s00421-017-3770-2. Epub 2017 Dec 1.
Arterial occlusion pressure (AOP) measured in a supine position is often used to set cuff pressures for blood flow restricted exercise (BFRE). However, supine AOP may not reflect seated or standing AOP, thus potentially influencing the degree of occlusion. The primary aim of the study was to investigate the effect of body position on AOP. A secondary aim was to investigate predictors of AOP using wide and narrow cuffs.
Twenty-four subjects underwent measurements of thigh circumference, skinfold and blood pressure, followed by assessments of thigh AOP in supine and seated positions with a wide and a narrow cuff, respectively, using Doppler ultrasound.
In the supine position, AOP was 148 ± 19 and 348 ± 94 mmHg with the wide and narrow cuff, respectively. This increased to 177 ± 20 and 409 ± 101 mmHg in the seated position, with correlations between supine and seated AOP of R = 0.81 and R = 0.50 for the wide and narrow cuff, respectively. For both cuff widths, thigh circumference constituted the strongest predictor of AOP, with diastolic blood pressure explaining additional variance with the wide cuff. The predictive strength of these variables did not differ between body positions.
Our results indicate that body position strongly influences lower limb AOP, especially with narrow cuffs, yielding very high AOP (≥ 500-600 mmHg) in some subjects. This should be taken into account in the standardization of cuff pressures used during BFRE to better control the physiological effects of BFRE.
仰卧位测量的动脉闭塞压(AOP)常用于设定血流受限运动(BFRE)的袖带压力。然而,仰卧位 AOP 可能无法反映坐姿或站立位 AOP,从而可能影响闭塞程度。本研究的主要目的是研究体位对 AOP 的影响。次要目的是使用宽袖带和窄袖带研究 AOP 的预测因素。
24 名受试者接受大腿围度、皮褶和血压测量,然后分别使用多普勒超声评估仰卧位和坐姿时宽袖带和窄袖带的大腿 AOP。
仰卧位时,宽袖带和窄袖带的 AOP 分别为 148 ± 19 和 348 ± 94 mmHg。在坐姿时,AOP 分别增加至 177 ± 20 和 409 ± 101 mmHg,宽袖带和窄袖带的仰卧位和坐姿 AOP 之间的相关性分别为 R = 0.81 和 R = 0.50。对于两种袖带宽度,大腿围度都是 AOP 的最强预测因素,而宽袖带的舒张压还解释了额外的方差。这些变量的预测强度在不同体位之间没有差异。
我们的结果表明,体位强烈影响下肢 AOP,尤其是使用窄袖带时,在一些受试者中产生非常高的 AOP(≥500-600 mmHg)。在 BFRE 期间使用袖带压力的标准化中应考虑到这一点,以更好地控制 BFRE 的生理效应。