Gawel Dawid, Jarosz Jakub, Trybulski Robert, Krzysztofik Michal, Makar Piotr, Vieira João Guilherme, Trybek Grzegorz, Wilk Michal
Institute of Sport Sciences, Jerzy Kukuczka Academy of Physical Education in Katowice, Poland.
Department of Medical Sciences, The Wojciech Korfanty School of Economics, Katowice, Poland.
Biol Sport. 2024 Jul;41(3):89-96. doi: 10.5114/biolsport.2024.133004. Epub 2024 Jan 2.
The main objective of this study was to evaluate the effects of different ischemic pressures applied during rest intervals on bar velocity during the bench press exercise. 10 resistance-trained males (age = 23.2 ± 2.7 years; body mass = 83.9 ± 9 kg; body height = 181 ± 5.2 cm; bench press 1 repetition maximum (1RM) = 125 ± 16.4 kg; training experience = 5.4 ± 3.4 years) participated in the study. During 4 experimental sessions, following a randomized crossover design, the subjects performed 5 sets of 3 repetitions of the bench press exercise with a load of 60% 1RM under conditions: with ischemia (50% or 80% of arterial occlusion pressure), with SHAM ischemia (20 mmHg) and without ischemia (control condition). For the ischemic conditions cuffs were applied before each set for 6.5 min and released 30 s before the start of the set as reperfusion (6.5 min ischemia + 0.5 min reperfusion). In the control condition, ischemia was not applied. The two-way repeated measures ANOVA showed no significant condition × set interaction for mean bar velocity (MV; = 0.17) and peak bar velocity (PV; = 0.66). There was also no main effect of condition for MV ( = 0.58) and PV ( = 0.61). The results indicate that ischemic or SHAM treatment (6.5 minutes ischemia or SHAM + 30 s reperfusion) does not affect mean and peak bar velocity during the bench press exercise regardless of the applied pressure.
Front Physiol. 2021-2-25
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020-5-26
J Strength Cond Res. 2022-8-1
Int J Exerc Sci. 2023-1-1
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022-10-3