• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Qualitative evaluation of trauma delays in road traffic injury patients in Maringá, Brazil.巴西马林加道路交通伤患者创伤延迟的定性评估
BMC Health Serv Res. 2017 Dec 2;17(1):804. doi: 10.1186/s12913-017-2762-6.
2
Road Traffic Injury in Lagos, Nigeria: Assessing Prehospital Care.尼日利亚拉各斯的道路交通伤害:评估院前护理。
Prehosp Disaster Med. 2017 Aug;32(4):424-430. doi: 10.1017/S1049023X17006410. Epub 2017 May 2.
3
Pre-hospital trauma care resources for road traffic injuries in a middle-income country--a province based study on need and access in Iran.中低收入国家道路交通伤害院前创伤救治资源研究——伊朗以省份为基础的需求和可及性研究。
Injury. 2011 Sep;42(9):879-84. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2010.04.024. Epub 2010 Jun 2.
4
Barriers and facilitators to provide effective pre-hospital trauma care for road traffic injury victims in Iran: a grounded theory approach.伊朗为道路交通事故创伤受害者提供有效院前创伤护理的障碍和促进因素:扎根理论方法。
BMC Emerg Med. 2010 Nov 8;10:20. doi: 10.1186/1471-227X-10-20.
5
Increased morbidity associated with weekend paediatric road traffic injuries: 10-year analysis of trauma registry data.与周末儿童道路交通伤害相关的发病率增加:创伤登记数据的10年分析
Injury. 2016 Jun;47(6):1236-41. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2016.02.021. Epub 2016 Mar 3.
6
Traffic police officers' experience of post-crash care to road traffic injury victims: a qualitative study in Tanzania".交警对道路交通伤受害者的伤后护理体验:坦桑尼亚的一项定性研究
BMC Emerg Med. 2019 Oct 11;19(1):51. doi: 10.1186/s12873-019-0274-x.
7
The requirements and challenges in preventing of road traffic injury in Iran. A qualitative study.伊朗预防道路交通伤害的要求和挑战。一项定性研究。
BMC Public Health. 2009 Dec 23;9:486. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-9-486.
8
Household economic impact of road traffic injury versus routine emergencies in a low-income country.道路交通伤害与低收入国家常规紧急情况对家庭经济的影响。
Injury. 2021 Sep;52(9):2657-2664. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2021.06.007. Epub 2021 Jun 20.
9
First Responders and Prehospital Care for Road Traffic Injuries in Malawi.马拉维道路交通事故的急救人员与院前护理
Prehosp Disaster Med. 2017 Feb;32(1):14-19. doi: 10.1017/S1049023X16001175. Epub 2016 Dec 7.
10
Exploring the provision of hospital trauma care for road traffic injury victims in Iran: a qualitative approach.探索伊朗为道路交通事故受伤者提供医院创伤护理的情况:一种定性研究方法。
J Inj Violence Res. 2013 Jan;5(1):28-37. doi: 10.5249/jivr.v5i1.195. Epub 2011 Nov 16.

引用本文的文献

1
Strengthening trauma resuscitation education and training in low-resource settings: A call for global inclusion.加强资源匮乏地区的创伤复苏教育与培训:呼吁全球参与。
Resusc Plus. 2025 Mar 20;23:100935. doi: 10.1016/j.resplu.2025.100935. eCollection 2025 May.
2
Perceptions of professional challenges by emergency medical services providers: a qualitative content analysis study.紧急医疗服务提供者对专业挑战的认知:一项定性内容分析研究。
BMC Emerg Med. 2024 Mar 6;24(1):38. doi: 10.1186/s12873-024-00955-6.
3
Is "Vital" More Appropriate than "Super" Specialty in Addressing Emergency Neurosurgery for Head Injury and Stroke in Rural India.在印度农村地区,对于颅脑损伤和中风的急诊神经外科治疗而言,“关键”专科是否比“超级”专科更合适。
Asian J Neurosurg. 2021 Dec 18;16(4):907-908. doi: 10.4103/ajns.ajns_179_21. eCollection 2021 Oct-Dec.
4
Barriers to Trauma Care in South and Central America: a systematic review.南美洲和中美洲创伤护理的障碍:系统评价。
Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol. 2022 Aug;32(6):1163-1177. doi: 10.1007/s00590-021-03080-3. Epub 2021 Aug 14.
5
Assessing trauma care systems in low-income and middle-income countries: a systematic review and evidence synthesis mapping the Three Delays framework to injury health system assessments.评估低收入和中等收入国家的创伤护理系统:一项系统评价及证据综合,将“三个延误”框架映射到伤害卫生系统评估中。
BMJ Glob Health. 2021 May;6(5). doi: 10.1136/bmjgh-2020-004324.
6
Use of prehospital, hospitalization and presence of sequelae and/or disability in road traffic injury victims in Brazil.巴西道路交通伤害受害者的院前、住院期间以及后遗症和/或残疾的使用情况。
PLoS One. 2021 Apr 16;16(4):e0249895. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0249895. eCollection 2021.
7
Meta-synthesis of qualitative evidence in road traffic injury prevention: a scoping review of qualitative studies (2000 to 2019).道路交通伤害预防定性证据的元综合:对定性研究的范围综述(2000年至2019年)
Arch Public Health. 2020 Nov 3;78(1):110. doi: 10.1186/s13690-020-00493-0.

本文引用的文献

1
Prehospital and Emergency Care: Updates from the Disease Control Priorities, Version 3.院前与急诊护理:《疾病控制优先事项》第3版更新内容
World J Surg. 2015 Sep;39(9):2161-7. doi: 10.1007/s00268-015-2997-5.
2
An evaluation of the professional, social and demographic profile and quality of life of physicians working at the Prehospital Emergency Medical System (SAMU) in Brazil.对巴西院前急救医疗系统(SAMU)工作的医生的专业、社会和人口统计学概况及生活质量的评估。
Clinics (Sao Paulo). 2014 Sep;69(9):601-7. doi: 10.6061/clinics/2014(09)05.
3
The golden hour in trauma: dogma or medical folklore?创伤中的黄金一小时:是教条还是医学传说?
Injury. 2015 Apr;46(4):525-7. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2014.08.043. Epub 2014 Sep 16.
4
Patient perspectives on the promptness and quality of care of road traffic incident victims in Peru: a cross-sectional, active surveillance study.秘鲁交通事故受害者对护理及时性和质量的患者观点:一项横断面主动监测研究。
F1000Res. 2013 Aug 9;2:167. doi: 10.12688/f1000research.2-167.v1. eCollection 2013.
5
Helicopter emergency medical services for adults with major trauma.为严重创伤的成年人提供直升机紧急医疗服务。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013 Mar 28(3):CD009228. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009228.pub2.
6
Comparison between two mobile pre-hospital care services for trauma patients.两种移动创伤患者院前护理服务的比较。
World J Emerg Surg. 2012 Aug 22;7 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):S6. doi: 10.1186/1749-7922-7-S1-S6.
7
The current scenario of emergency care policies in Brazil.巴西紧急护理政策的现状。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2013 Feb 20;13:70. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-13-70.
8
Assessment of the status of prehospital care in 13 low- and middle-income countries.评估 13 个中低收入国家的院前医疗照护状况。
Prehosp Emerg Care. 2012 Jul-Sep;16(3):381-9. doi: 10.3109/10903127.2012.664245. Epub 2012 Apr 10.
9
Redefining the golden hour for severe head injury in an urban setting: the effect of prehospital arrival times on patient outcomes.重新定义城市环境中严重头部损伤的黄金时间:院前到达时间对患者结局的影响。
Injury. 2013 May;44(5):606-10. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2012.01.011. Epub 2012 Feb 14.
10
Mobile Emergency Care Service: analysis of Brazilian policy.移动急救护理服务:巴西政策分析。
Rev Saude Publica. 2011 Jun;45(3):519-28. doi: 10.1590/s0034-89102011005000022. Epub 2011 Apr 15.

巴西马林加道路交通伤患者创伤延迟的定性评估

Qualitative evaluation of trauma delays in road traffic injury patients in Maringá, Brazil.

作者信息

Patel Anjni, Vissoci João Ricardo Nickenig, Hocker Michael, Molina Enio, Gil Nelly Moraes, Staton Catherine

机构信息

Department of Surgery, Division of Emergency Medicine, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA.

Department of Emergency Medicine, Section of Prehospital and Disaster Medicine, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.

出版信息

BMC Health Serv Res. 2017 Dec 2;17(1):804. doi: 10.1186/s12913-017-2762-6.

DOI:10.1186/s12913-017-2762-6
PMID:29197385
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5712173/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Road traffic injuries (RTIs) are the eighth leading cause of death worldwide, with an estimated 90% of RTIs occurring in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) like Brazil. There has been minimal research in evaluation of delays in transport of RTI patients to trauma centers in LMICs. The objective of this study is to determine specific causes of delays in prehospital transport of road traffic injury patients to designated trauma centers in Maringá, Brazil.

METHODS

A qualitative method was used based on the Consolidated Criteria for Reporting Qualitative Research (COREQ) approach. Eleven health care providers employed at prehospital or hospital settings were interviewed with questions specific to delays in care for RTI patients. A thematic analysis was conducted.

RESULTS

Responses to primary causes of delay in treatment to RTI patients fell into the following categories: 1) lack of public education, 2) traffic, 3) insufficient personnel/ambulances, 4) bureaucracy, and 5) poor location of stations. Suggestions for improvement in delays fell into the categories of 1) need for centralized station/avoid traffic, 2) improving public education, 3) Increase personnel, 4) increase ambulances, 5) proper extrication/rapid treatment.

CONCLUSION

Our study found varied responses between hospital and SAMU providers regarding specific causes of delay for RTI patients; SAMU providers cited primarily traffic, bureaucracy, and poor location as primary factors while hospital employees focused more on public health aspects. These results mirror prehospital system challenges in other developing countries, but also provide solutions for improvement with better infrastructure and public health campaigns.

摘要

背景

道路交通伤害(RTIs)是全球第八大死因,估计90%的道路交通伤害发生在巴西等低收入和中等收入国家(LMICs)。在低收入和中等收入国家,对道路交通伤害患者转运至创伤中心的延误评估研究极少。本研究的目的是确定巴西马林加市道路交通伤害患者院前转运至指定创伤中心延误的具体原因。

方法

采用基于定性研究报告统一标准(COREQ)方法的定性研究方法。对11名在院前或医院工作的医护人员进行了访谈,询问了与道路交通伤害患者护理延误相关的具体问题。进行了主题分析。

结果

对道路交通伤害患者治疗延误的主要原因的回答分为以下几类:1)缺乏公众教育,2)交通,3)人员/救护车不足,4)官僚作风,5)站点位置不佳。改善延误的建议分为以下几类:1)需要集中站点/避开交通,2)改善公众教育,3)增加人员,4)增加救护车,5)正确解救/快速治疗。

结论

我们的研究发现,医院和紧急医疗服务(SAMU)提供者对道路交通伤害患者延误的具体原因有不同的回答;紧急医疗服务提供者主要将交通、官僚作风和位置不佳列为主要因素,而医院工作人员则更关注公共卫生方面。这些结果反映了其他发展中国家院前系统面临的挑战,但也为通过改善基础设施和开展公共卫生运动来改进提供了解决方案。