Ravlo O, Carl P, Crawford M E, Bach V, Mikkelsen B O, Nielsen H K
Department of Anesthesiology, Esbjerg Central Hospital, Denmark.
Anesth Analg. 1989 Mar;68(3):234-7.
In a randomized blind trial, the general condition of 40 neonates was assessed following midazolam- or thiopental-based general anesthesia for elective cesarean section. Among 19 neonatal neurobehavioral observations and tests, statistically significant differences between the midazolam and the thiopental groups were rare. However, a statistically significant interaction with regard to body temperature, general body tone, and arm recoil was observed where results were inferior for midazolam, although only within the first 2 hours. It was concluded that midazolam is as safe as thiopental for the induction and maintenance of elective cesarean section anesthesia in neonates.
在一项随机盲法试验中,对40例新生儿在接受基于咪达唑仑或硫喷妥钠的全身麻醉进行择期剖宫产术后的一般状况进行了评估。在19项新生儿神经行为观察和测试中,咪达唑仑组和硫喷妥钠组之间的统计学显著差异很少见。然而,观察到在体温、全身肌张力和手臂回缩方面存在统计学显著的交互作用,其中咪达唑仑组的结果较差,尽管仅在最初2小时内。得出的结论是,在新生儿择期剖宫产麻醉的诱导和维持方面,咪达唑仑与硫喷妥钠一样安全。