Suppr超能文献

咪达唑仑与硫喷妥钠用于择期剖宫产麻醉的随机对照研究:II. 新生儿

A randomized comparison between midazolam and thiopental for elective cesarean section anesthesia: II. Neonates.

作者信息

Ravlo O, Carl P, Crawford M E, Bach V, Mikkelsen B O, Nielsen H K

机构信息

Department of Anesthesiology, Esbjerg Central Hospital, Denmark.

出版信息

Anesth Analg. 1989 Mar;68(3):234-7.

PMID:2919759
Abstract

In a randomized blind trial, the general condition of 40 neonates was assessed following midazolam- or thiopental-based general anesthesia for elective cesarean section. Among 19 neonatal neurobehavioral observations and tests, statistically significant differences between the midazolam and the thiopental groups were rare. However, a statistically significant interaction with regard to body temperature, general body tone, and arm recoil was observed where results were inferior for midazolam, although only within the first 2 hours. It was concluded that midazolam is as safe as thiopental for the induction and maintenance of elective cesarean section anesthesia in neonates.

摘要

在一项随机盲法试验中,对40例新生儿在接受基于咪达唑仑或硫喷妥钠的全身麻醉进行择期剖宫产术后的一般状况进行了评估。在19项新生儿神经行为观察和测试中,咪达唑仑组和硫喷妥钠组之间的统计学显著差异很少见。然而,观察到在体温、全身肌张力和手臂回缩方面存在统计学显著的交互作用,其中咪达唑仑组的结果较差,尽管仅在最初2小时内。得出的结论是,在新生儿择期剖宫产麻醉的诱导和维持方面,咪达唑仑与硫喷妥钠一样安全。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验