Renal and Hypertension Units, Fundació Puigvert, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Instituto de Investigación Biomédica Sant Pau (IIB Sant Pau), Redes (ISCIII RETIC REDINREN RD16/0009 FEDER FUNDS), Barcelona, Spain.
Department of Internal Medicine, Hospital Mútua Terrassa, University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
Kidney Blood Press Res. 2017;42(6):1068-1077. doi: 10.1159/000485595. Epub 2017 Dec 4.
BACKGROUND/AIMS: Central blood pressure (BP) has been suggested to be a better estimator of hypertension-associated risks. We aimed to evaluate the association of 24-hour central BP, in comparison with 24-hour peripheral BP, with the presence of renal organ damage in hypertensive patients.
Brachial and central (calculated by an oscillometric system through brachial pulse wave analysis) office BP and ambulatory BP monitoring (ABPM) data and aortic pulse wave velocity (PWV) were measured in 208 hypertensive patients. Renal organ damage was evaluated by means of the albumin to creatinine ratio and the estimated glomerular filtration rate.
Fifty-four patients (25.9%) were affected by renal organ damage, displaying either microalbuminuria (urinary albumin excretion ≥30 mg/g creatinine) or an estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) <60 ml/min/1.73 m2. Compared to those without renal abnormalities, hypertensive patients with kidney damage had higher values of office brachial systolic BP (SBP) and pulse pressure (PP), and 24-h, daytime, and nighttime central and brachial SBP and PP. They also had a blunted nocturnal decrease in both central and brachial BP, and higher values of aortic PWV. After adjustment for age, gender, and antihypertensive treatment, only ABPM-derived BP estimates (both central and brachial) showed significant associations with the presence of renal damage. Odds ratios for central BP estimates were not significantly higher than those obtained for brachial BP.
Compared with peripheral ABPM, cuff-based oscillometric central ABPM does not show a closer association with presence of renal organ damage in hypertensive patients. More studies, however, need to be done to better identify the role of central BP in clinical practice.
背景/目的:中心血压(BP)已被认为是评估高血压相关风险的更好指标。我们旨在评估 24 小时中心 BP 与 24 小时外周 BP 相比,与高血压患者肾脏器官损伤的关系。
对 208 例高血压患者进行肱动脉和中心(通过肱动脉脉搏波分析的示波系统计算)诊室 BP 和动态血压监测(ABPM)以及主动脉脉搏波速度(PWV)的测量。通过白蛋白与肌酐比值和估算肾小球滤过率评估肾脏器官损伤。
54 例患者(25.9%)发生肾脏器官损伤,表现为微量白蛋白尿(尿白蛋白排泄量≥30mg/g 肌酐)或估算肾小球滤过率(eGFR)<60ml/min/1.73m2。与肾脏正常的高血压患者相比,有肾脏损害的高血压患者诊室肱动脉收缩压(SBP)和脉压(PP)以及 24 小时、白天和夜间中心和肱动脉 SBP 和 PP 更高。他们夜间中心和肱动脉 BP 下降也减弱,主动脉 PWV 值更高。在调整年龄、性别和降压治疗后,只有 ABPM 衍生的 BP 评估值(中心和肱动脉)与肾脏损害的存在有显著相关性。中心 BP 评估的比值比与肱动脉 BP 相比没有显著更高。
与外周 ABPM 相比,基于袖带的示波法中心 ABPM 与高血压患者肾脏器官损伤的相关性不高。然而,需要进行更多的研究,以更好地确定中心 BP 在临床实践中的作用。