de la Sierra Alejandro, Pareja Julia, Fernández-Llama Patricia, Armario Pedro, Yun Sergi, Acosta Eva, Calero Francesca, Vázquez Susana, Blanch Pedro, Sierra Cristina, Oliveras Anna
aDepartment of Internal Medicine, Hospital Mutua Terrassa, University of Barcelona, Terrassa bRenal and Hypertension Units, Fundació Puigvert, Universitat Autónoma de Barcelona, Barcelona cCardiovascular Disease Unit, Hospital Moisès Broggi, Sant Joan Despí dDepartment of Nephrology, Hospital del Mar eDepartment of Internal Medicine, Hospital Clínic, Barcelona, Spain.
J Hypertens. 2017 Oct;35(10):2000-2005. doi: 10.1097/HJH.0000000000001431.
Central blood pressure (BP) is increasingly considered as a better estimator of hypertension associated risks. We aimed to evaluate the association of 24-h central BP, in comparison with 24-h peripheral BP, with the presence of target organ damage (TOD).
Cross-sectional study of 208 hypertensive patients, aged 57 ± 12 years, 34% women. Office (mean of 4 measurements) and 24-h central and peripheral BP were measured by the oscillometric Mobil-O-Graph device. TOD was assessed at cardiac (left ventricular hypertrophy by echocardiography), renal (reduction of glomerular filtration rate and/or microalbuminuria), and arterial (increased aortic pulse wave velocity) levels.
A total of 107 patients (51.4%) had TOD (77, 35% patients left ventricular hypertrophy; 54, 25.9% renal abnormalities; and 40, 19.2% arterial stiffness). All SBP and pulse BP estimates (office, 24-h, daytime, and night-time) were associated with the presence of TOD, after adjustment for age, sex, and antihypertensive treatment, with higher odds ratios for ambulatory-derived values. Odds ratios for central and peripheral BP were similar for all office, 24-h, daytime, and night-time BP. After simultaneous adjustment, peripheral, but not central, 24-h and night-time SBP and pulse pressures were associated with the presence of TOD.
TOD in hypertension is associated with BP elevation, independently of the type of measurement (office or ambulatory, central or peripheral). Central BP, even monitored during 24 h, is not better associated with TOD than peripheral BP. These results do not support a routine measurement of 24-h central BP.
中心血压(BP)越来越被认为是高血压相关风险的更好评估指标。我们旨在评估24小时中心血压与24小时外周血压相比,与靶器官损害(TOD)存在情况之间的关联。
对208例高血压患者进行横断面研究,患者年龄57±12岁,女性占34%。采用示波法Mobil-O-Graph设备测量诊室血压(4次测量的平均值)以及24小时中心血压和外周血压。通过超声心动图评估心脏方面的TOD(左心室肥厚)、肾脏方面的TOD(肾小球滤过率降低和/或微量白蛋白尿)以及动脉方面的TOD(主动脉脉搏波速度增加)。
共有107例患者(51.4%)存在TOD(77例,35%患者有左心室肥厚;54例,25.9%有肾脏异常;40例,19.2%有动脉僵硬度增加)。在对年龄、性别和降压治疗进行校正后,所有收缩压和脉压估计值(诊室、24小时、日间和夜间)均与TOD的存在相关,动态血压衍生值的优势比更高。中心血压和外周血压在所有诊室、24小时、日间和夜间血压中的优势比相似。在同时校正后,外周24小时和夜间收缩压及脉压与TOD的存在相关,而中心血压则不然。
高血压患者的TOD与血压升高相关,与测量类型(诊室或动态、中心或外周)无关。即使进行24小时监测,中心血压与TOD的关联也并不比外周血压更好。这些结果不支持常规测量24小时中心血压。