Suppr超能文献

对被选为国际标准(IS)制剂候选物的桦树花粉过敏原提取物蛋白质浓度的重新评估。

Reestimations of the protein concentrations of birch pollen allergen extracts selected as candidates for the international standard (IS) preparation.

作者信息

Vik H, Holen E, Dybendal T, Elsayed S

机构信息

Laboratory of Clinical Biochemistry, University Hospital, Haukeland Sykehus, Bergen, Norway.

出版信息

Ann Allergy. 1989 Feb;62(2):87-90.

PMID:2919807
Abstract

The total protein concentrations of six selected candidates for an international standard (IS) of birch pollen were previously estimated (Ann Allergy 1987;58:71-77). The results of analyses showed large variations depending both on the method and the reference protein used. More than 2-fold variations in the protein content were obtained using Bradford's protein binding method. In the present communication the protein contents of these birch IS-candidates were reestimated by Lowry, a modified Lowry technique, Bradford's protein-dye binding, bicinchoninic acid reagent and amino acid compositions. Great variations were obtained for the protein contents, depending on the technique employed, emphasizing the difficulties of choosing a proper method of protein analyses of pollen allergens. The Lowry and the bicinchoninic acid reagent methods gave the highest obtained protein estimates, while the modified Lowry and Bradford's protein-dye binding methods showed the lowest values. The amino acid analysis gave concentrations similar to those obtained by Lowry and bicinchoninic acid reagent methods. The Lowry method seemed to be adequate for the analysis of plant proteins. The amino acid analysis is currently the most precise method for estimation of the protein concentration irrespective of additional prosthetic groups. A serious shortcoming of the method is that it requires an amino acid analyser or other liquid chromatrographic systems, which are not commonly in laboratory use.

摘要

之前已经对六种选定的桦树花粉国际标准品(IS)候选物的总蛋白浓度进行了估算(《过敏与临床免疫学杂志》1987年;58:71 - 77)。分析结果显示,根据所使用的方法和参考蛋白的不同,存在很大差异。使用考马斯亮蓝蛋白结合法时,蛋白质含量的变化超过了2倍。在本报告中,通过洛瑞法、改良洛瑞技术、考马斯亮蓝蛋白染料结合法、二喹啉甲酸试剂法和氨基酸组成分析,对这些桦树IS候选物的蛋白质含量进行了重新估算。根据所采用的技术不同,蛋白质含量存在很大差异,这突出了选择合适的花粉过敏原蛋白质分析方法的困难。洛瑞法和二喹啉甲酸试剂法得出的蛋白质估算值最高,而改良洛瑞法和考马斯亮蓝蛋白染料结合法得出的值最低。氨基酸分析得出的浓度与洛瑞法和二喹啉甲酸试剂法得到的浓度相似。洛瑞法似乎适用于植物蛋白的分析。氨基酸分析目前是估算蛋白质浓度最精确的方法,无论是否存在额外的辅基。该方法的一个严重缺点是需要氨基酸分析仪或其他液相色谱系统,而这些设备在实验室中并不常用。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验