Stephan Carl N, Preisler Rory
Laboratory for Human Craniofacial and Skeletal Identification (HuCS-ID Lab), School of Biomedical Sciences, The University of Queensland, Brisbane 4072, Australia.
Laboratory for Human Craniofacial and Skeletal Identification (HuCS-ID Lab), School of Biomedical Sciences, The University of Queensland, Brisbane 4072, Australia.
Forensic Sci Int. 2018 Jan;282:220.e1-220.e12. doi: 10.1016/j.forsciint.2017.11.014. Epub 2017 Nov 15.
Facial soft tissue thicknesses (FSTT) set important quantitative guides in craniofacial identification, but so far Australian FSTTs have only been published for supine cadavers. This study aimed to use B-mode ultrasound to measure FSTTs in living Australians (N=63 participants; n=52 [x¯=21 years, s=2 years]; and n=11 [x¯=54years, s=13years]) using 14 craniometric landmarks with participants in both upright and supine positions. The multiple pre-existing Australian cadaver investigations (n=7 reporting FSTT means and 6 of these reporting raw datasets) enabled living and cadaveric samples drawn from the same parent population to be compared. By using a non-invasive and safe imaging method (no ionising radiation) repeated measurements could be taken in the in vivo participants to gauge measurement reliability (and compare to pre-existing reliability for cadaver measurements): mean r-TEM=12%; max r-TEM=25%. In terms of changes between upright and supine positions (as measured by B-mode ultrasound) only 2 of 14 measured landmarks had FSTT changes in excess of 1mm. Comparisons of the in vivo ultrasound data to pre-existing needle puncture studies demonstrated that mean B-mode ultrasound measurements were very similar to cadaver values. Contrary to popular thought, but in keeping with the findings of prior meta-analyses, cadaver FSTT data are good proxies to living subjects, at least as measured by ultrasound. To increase sample sizes and triangulate upon ground truth FSTT values, weighted grand means combining all Australian samples were calculated (n range=280-385) and compared to the multi-group 2018 adult T-Tables (max. n=10,333).
面部软组织厚度(FSTT)为颅面识别提供了重要的定量指导,但到目前为止,澳大利亚的FSTT数据仅针对仰卧位尸体公布。本研究旨在使用B超测量澳大利亚活体(N = 63名参与者;n = 52 [x¯ = 21岁,s = 2岁];n = 11 [x¯ = 54岁,s = 13岁])的FSTT,使用14个颅骨测量标志点,参与者分别处于直立位和仰卧位。多项已有的澳大利亚尸体研究(n = 7报告了FSTT均值,其中6项报告了原始数据集)使得能够比较来自同一总体的活体和尸体样本。通过使用无创且安全的成像方法(无电离辐射),可以对活体参与者进行重复测量以评估测量可靠性(并与尸体测量的已有可靠性进行比较):平均相对测量误差(r-TEM)= 12%;最大r-TEM = 25%。就直立位和仰卧位之间的变化(通过B超测量)而言,14个测量标志点中只有2个的FSTT变化超过1毫米。将活体超声数据与已有的针刺研究进行比较表明,B超测量均值与尸体值非常相似。与普遍看法相反,但与先前荟萃分析的结果一致,尸体FSTT数据至少通过超声测量是活体受试者的良好替代指标。为了增加样本量并确定FSTT真实值,计算了合并所有澳大利亚样本的加权总均值(n范围 = 280 - 385),并与2018年多组成人T表(最大n = 10,333)进行比较。