a Porto Biomechanics Laboratory , Porto , Portugal.
b Faculty of Sports, Center of Research, Education, Innovation and Intervention in Sport , University of Porto , Porto , Portugal.
Sports Biomech. 2019 Feb;18(1):39-50. doi: 10.1080/14763141.2017.1380222. Epub 2017 Dec 4.
The aim of the present study was to determine which approach to calculating shoulder ratios is the most sensitive for determining shoulder torque imbalance in handball players. Twenty-six participants (handball athletes, n = 13; healthy controls, n = 13) performed isokinetic concentric and eccentric shoulder internal rotation (IR) and external rotation (ER) assessment at 60, 180 and 300°/s. We used eight approaches to calculating shoulder ratios: four concentric (i.e. concentric ER torque divided by concentric IR torque), and four functional (i.e. eccentric ER torque divided by concentric IR torque) at the velocities of 60, 180 and 300°/s for both IR and ER, and combining 60°/s of ER and 300°/s of IR. A three factorial ANOVA (factors: shoulder ratios, upper limb sides, and groups) along with Tukey's post-hoc analysis, and effect sizes were calculated. The findings suggested the functional shoulder ratio combining 60°/s of ER and 300°/s of IR is the most sensitive to detect differences between upper limbs for handball players, and between players and controls for the dominant side. The functional shoulder ratio combining 60°/s of ER with 300°/s of IR seems to present advantages over the other approaches for identifying upper limb asymmetries and differences in shoulder torque balance related to throwing.
本研究旨在确定计算肩部比率的方法中,哪一种方法对确定手球运动员肩部扭矩不平衡最敏感。26 名参与者(手球运动员,n=13;健康对照组,n=13)在 60、180 和 300°/s 的角速度下进行等速向心性和离心性肩部内旋(IR)和外旋(ER)评估。我们使用了八种方法来计算肩部比率:四个同心(即同心 ER 扭矩除以同心 IR 扭矩)和四个功能(即偏心 ER 扭矩除以同心 IR 扭矩),在 60、180 和 300°/s 的角速度下用于 IR 和 ER,以及组合 60°/s 的 ER 和 300°/s 的 IR。采用三因素方差分析(因素:肩部比率、上肢侧和组)以及 Tukey 事后分析和效应大小进行计算。研究结果表明,用于检测手球运动员上肢之间以及运动员与对照组之间优势侧差异的功能肩部比率组合 60°/s 的 ER 和 300°/s 的 IR 最敏感。用于检测与投掷相关的肩部扭矩平衡上肢不对称和差异的 60°/s 的 ER 与 300°/s 的 IR 的功能肩部比率似乎优于其他方法。