Adigüzel Emre, Yaşar Evren, Kesikburun Serdar, Demir Yasin, Aras Berke, Safaz Ismail, Alaca Ridvan, Tan Arif K
Gaziler Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Education and Research Hospital.
Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Gülhane Medical School, Health Sciences University.
Int J Rehabil Res. 2018 Mar;41(1):47-51. doi: 10.1097/MRR.0000000000000261.
Many reports have investigated rehabilitation outcomes after a traumatic brain injury (TBI); however, comparably less is known about whether they differ from outcomes of an anoxic brain injury (ABI). Thus, we aimed to compare the rehabilitation outcomes of patients with ABI with control patients who have TBI. Forty participants with ABI and 40 participants with TBI were included in this retrospective study. Participants with ABI were matched with participants with TBI who had similar clinical characteristics such as age, initial Functional Independence Measurement (FIM) score, and duration of coma. FIM and Functional Ambulation Classification (FAC) scores on rehabilitation admission and on rehabilitation discharge were recorded. The FIM score in the ABI group was 41.7±28.5 on rehabilitation admission and increased to 57.1±31.4 on rehabilitation discharge. The FIM score in the TBI group was 40.8±24.0 on rehabilitation admission and increased to 65.9±35.3 on rehabilitation discharge. There was no statistically significant difference in the FIM scores on rehabilitation discharge between groups. Initial FAC was similar in both groups and there was no statistically significant difference in the FAC scores on rehabilitation discharge. The multiple linear regression analysis showed that intensive care unit length of stay had an inverse relationship with the FAC change. We did not find significant differences in the rehabilitation outcomes of participants with ABI compared with participants with TBI. Considering the lack of information in the literature on ABI rehabilitation, this study may be important to guide rehabilitation teams.
许多报告都对创伤性脑损伤(TBI)后的康复结果进行了调查;然而,对于这些结果是否与缺氧性脑损伤(ABI)的结果不同,人们所知相对较少。因此,我们旨在比较ABI患者与TBI对照患者的康复结果。这项回顾性研究纳入了40名ABI患者和40名TBI患者。将ABI患者与TBI患者进行匹配,使其具有相似的临床特征,如年龄、初始功能独立性测量(FIM)评分和昏迷持续时间。记录康复入院时和康复出院时的FIM和功能步行分类(FAC)评分。ABI组康复入院时的FIM评分为41.7±28.5,康复出院时增至57.1±31.4。TBI组康复入院时的FIM评分为40.8±24.0,康复出院时增至65.9±35.3。两组康复出院时的FIM评分无统计学显著差异。两组的初始FAC相似,康复出院时的FAC评分也无统计学显著差异。多元线性回归分析表明,重症监护病房住院时间与FAC变化呈负相关。我们没有发现ABI患者与TBI患者的康复结果存在显著差异。考虑到文献中关于ABI康复的信息匮乏,本研究可能对指导康复团队具有重要意义。