Suppr超能文献

缺氧性脑损伤的康复结局:与创伤性脑损伤的病例对照比较。

Rehabilitation outcomes after anoxic brain injury: a case-controlled comparison with traumatic brain injury.

机构信息

Neuro Rehabilitation Program, Toronto Rehabilitation Institute, and the Division of Physiatry, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada M5G 2A2.

出版信息

PM R. 2009 Dec;1(12):1069-76. doi: 10.1016/j.pmrj.2009.09.013.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the functional outcomes of patients with anoxic brain injury (AnBI) compared with control patients with traumatic brain injury (TBI) during inpatient rehabilitation.

DESIGN

Matched case-controlled design.

SETTING

Inpatient neurorehabilitation program.

PARTICIPANTS

Fifteen patients with AnBI and 15 patients with TBI.

METHODS

Data of 15 patients with a primary diagnosis of AnBI were retrospectively reviewed and matched to 15 patients with TBI admitted within the same time frame on age, acute care length of stay, and functional status at admission.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE

Functional outcome was assessed by the use of the Functional Independence Measure (FIM).

RESULTS

Compared with the control patients with TBI, patients with AnBI achieved significantly lower FIM motor gain (16.3+/-15.6 versus 5.7+/-10.7, respectively) and efficiency scores (0.27+/-0.28 versus 0.06+/-0.13), discharge FIM cognition scores (25.9+/-5.9 versus 21.7+/-7.3), total FIM gain (22.5+/-19.6 versus 9.1+/-12.1), and total FIM efficiency scores (0.39+/-0.38 versus 0.10+/-0.16; all P<.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Results suggest a slower rate of recovery for patients with AnBI compared with TBI, with physical recovery being slower than cognitive recovery as measured by the FIM during inpatient rehabilitation when matched according to preinjury characteristics and functional status at rehabilitation admission. Future studies on larger samples of patients with AnBI and TBI that use a case-controlled design and longer-term outcome measurement are warranted to further clarify the differences in functional outcomes between these groups and to assess whether optimal rehabilitation interventions differ for these groups.

摘要

目的

比较缺氧性脑损伤(AnBI)患者与创伤性脑损伤(TBI)患者在住院康复期间的功能结局。

设计

匹配病例对照设计。

地点

住院神经康复计划。

参与者

15 名 AnBI 患者和 15 名 TBI 患者。

方法

回顾性分析了 15 例原发性 AnBI 患者的数据,并与同一时间段内入院的 15 例 TBI 患者进行了匹配,这些患者在年龄、急性护理住院时间和入院时的功能状态方面相匹配。

主要观察指标

采用功能独立性测量量表(FIM)评估功能结局。

结果

与对照 TBI 患者相比,AnBI 患者的 FIM 运动增益(16.3+/-15.6 与 5.7+/-10.7,分别)和效率评分(0.27+/-0.28 与 0.06+/-0.13)、出院 FIM 认知评分(25.9+/-5.9 与 21.7+/-7.3)、总 FIM 增益(22.5+/-19.6 与 9.1+/-12.1)和总 FIM 效率评分(0.39+/-0.38 与 0.10+/-0.16)均显著较低(均 P<.05)。

结论

结果表明,与 TBI 患者相比,AnBI 患者的康复速度较慢,在住院康复期间,根据损伤前特征和康复入院时的功能状态进行匹配时,身体恢复比认知恢复更慢,FIM 测量。需要对更大样本量的 AnBI 和 TBI 患者进行病例对照设计和更长期的结局测量的进一步研究,以进一步阐明这两组患者之间功能结局的差异,并评估这些患者群体的最佳康复干预措施是否不同。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验