Wood Jennifer D, Watson Amy C
Department of Criminal Justice and Centre for Security and Crime Science, Temple University, Philadelphia, P.A., USA.
Jane Addams College of Social Work, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA.
Policing Soc. 2017;27:289-299. doi: 10.1080/10439463.2016.1219734. Epub 2016 Aug 11.
There are calls across America for police to re-imagine themselves as "guardians" rather than "warriors" in the performance of their innumerable duties. The contentious history of police attitudes and practices surrounding encounters with people affected by mental illnesses can be understood through the lens of this wider push toward guardianship. At least as far back as the de-institutionalization of mental health care and the profound lack of community-based resources to fill service deficits, the role of police as mental health interventionists has been controversial and complex. This paper reviews the first wave of reform efforts designed to re-shape police sensibilities and practices in the handling of mental health-related encounters. We argue that such efforts, centred on specialized training and cooperative agreements with the health care sector, have advanced a guardian mindset through improved knowledge and attitudes about mental health vulnerabilities and needs. Building on the progress made, we suggest there are critical opportunities for a new wave of efforts that can further advance the guardianship agenda. We highlight three such opportunities: (1) Enhancing experiences of procedural justice during mental health-related encounters; (2) Building the evidence base through integrated data sets; and (3) Balancing a "case-based" focus with a "place-based" focus.
在美国,人们呼吁警察在履行无数职责时,将自己重新想象为“守护者”而非“战士”。围绕警察与精神疾病患者接触时的态度和做法存在争议的历史,可以通过这种更广泛的向监护角色转变的推动来理解。至少自精神卫生保健去机构化以及严重缺乏基于社区的资源来填补服务缺口以来,警察作为精神卫生干预者的角色就一直存在争议且复杂。本文回顾了旨在重塑警察在处理与精神卫生相关接触时的意识和做法的第一波改革努力。我们认为,这些以专门培训和与医疗保健部门的合作协议为中心的努力,通过改善对精神卫生脆弱性和需求的认识与态度,推动了一种守护者心态。在已取得的进展基础上,我们认为有新一波努力的关键机会,可以进一步推进监护议程。我们强调三个这样的机会:(1)在与精神卫生相关的接触中增强程序正义体验;(2)通过整合数据集建立证据基础;(3)平衡“基于个案”的关注与“基于地点”的关注。