Paat Yok-Fong, Markham Christine
Department of Social Work, The University of Texas at El Paso, El Paso, Texas, USA.
School of Public Health, The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, Texas, USA.
J Aggress Maltreat Trauma. 2016;25(8):793-811. doi: 10.1080/10926771.2016.1194938. Epub 2016 Aug 11.
Borrowing insights from concepts that have been shown to predict deviant or criminal outcomes (i.e., social bonding, personal control, and strain), this study examined dating violence from the perpetrators' and gender-relevance perspective among young college students (18-25 years old). This study raised 2 research questions: Were social bonding, personal control, and strain associated with college dating violence? How did these associations differ by gender? In sum, 2 types of social bonding (commitment to goal attainment and spending time with delinquent peers) were linked to psychological aggression in dating. Whereas self-control was negatively related to dating violence perpetration, antisocial tendencies were associated with physical aggression. Further, all the strain measures (i.e., daily hassles, relationship distress, and couple conflict) had a positive association with dating violence. When gender was considered, self-control had a protective effect for women and antisocial tendencies served as a risk factor for increased psychological violence among men.
本研究借鉴了已被证明可预测偏差或犯罪结果的概念（即社会联结、个人控制和压力），从犯罪者和性别相关性的角度，对18至25岁的年轻大学生中的约会暴力进行了研究。本研究提出了两个研究问题：社会联结、个人控制和压力与大学生约会暴力有关联吗？这些关联在性别上有何不同？总之，两种类型的社会联结（对目标达成的承诺和与不良同伴共度时光）与约会中的心理攻击有关。而自我控制与约会暴力行为呈负相关，反社会倾向则与身体攻击有关。此外，所有的压力测量指标（即日常烦恼、关系困扰和情侣冲突）都与约会暴力呈正相关。考虑到性别因素时，自我控制对女性有保护作用，而反社会倾向则是男性心理暴力增加的一个风险因素。
