Suppr超能文献

成人反应性和主动性攻击、敌意解释偏差与反社会型人格障碍之间的关系。

The relationship between adult reactive and proactive aggression, hostile interpretation bias, and antisocial personality disorder.

机构信息

Department of Clinical Psychological Science, Maastricht University, PO Box 616, 6200 MD Maastricht, The Netherlands.

出版信息

J Pers Disord. 2013 Feb;27(1):53-66. doi: 10.1521/pedi.2013.27.1.53.

Abstract

Reactive aggression (RA) refers to angry responses to provocation or frustration, while proactive aggression (PA) denotes nonemotional, instrumental, and unprovoked aggression. The current study examined personality-related and cognitive correlates of both aggressive types. Respectively, the predictive values of antisocial personality disorder (ASPD), and of hostile interpretation bias, which is the tendency to interpret ambiguous stimuli in a hostile manner, were studied. The sample consisted of n = 37 male adult patients with mixed diagnoses and n = 29 male nonpatients that responded to vignettes and pictures of ambiguous situations, using both open and closed answer formats. ASPD was assessed by means of the Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-IV Axis II disorders (SCID-II), and the Reactive Proactive Questionnaire (RPQ) measured RA and PA. Results showed that although both RA and PA types were predicted by ASPD traits, RA was additionally predicted by a hostile interpretation bias. These findings suggest that reducing hostile bias is a promising avenue for clinical treatment of ASPD-patients high in RA.

摘要

反应性攻击(RA)是指对挑衅或挫折的愤怒反应,而主动性攻击(PA)则表示非情绪化、工具性和无端的攻击。本研究考察了两种攻击性类型的与人格相关和认知相关的因素。分别研究了反社会人格障碍(ASPD)的预测价值,以及敌对解释偏差的预测价值,后者是指以敌对的方式解释模棱两可的刺激的倾向。样本包括 n = 37 名患有混合诊断的男性成年患者和 n = 29 名男性非患者,他们使用开放式和封闭式回答格式对模棱两可情况的情景和图片做出反应。使用 DSM-IV 轴 II 障碍的结构化临床访谈(SCID-II)评估 ASPD,使用反应性主动性问卷(RPQ)测量 RA 和 PA。结果表明,尽管 RA 和 PA 两种类型都可以通过 ASPD 特征来预测,但 RA 还可以通过敌对解释偏差来预测。这些发现表明,减少敌对偏见是治疗高 RA 的 ASPD 患者的一种有前途的临床途径。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验