Ko Sang-Hun, Cha Jae-Ryong, Lee Chae Chil, Joo Yong Tae, Eom Kyeong Su
Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Ulsan University Hospital, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Ulsan, Korea.
Clin Orthop Surg. 2017 Dec;9(4):506-513. doi: 10.4055/cios.2017.9.4.506. Epub 2017 Nov 10.
This study aims to compare the surgical outcomes of open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) and minimally invasive plate osteosynthesis (MIPO) using a screw compression method in simple humeral shaft fractures.
This retrospective study was performed with 50 patients who had surgical interventions for the treatment of simple humeral shaft fractures and had follow-ups of at least 12 months in Ulsan University Hospital between August 2008 and June 2015. Group 1 included 23 patients treated with ORIF and group 2 included 27 patients treated with the MIPO technique using a locking screw plate. The time to clinical/radiographic union, the joint range of motion (ROM), and function were evaluated.
The average time to clinical/radiographic bone union was shorter in group 2 (12.0 ± 3.7 weeks/14.8 ± 2.0 weeks in group 1 and 9.4 ± 1.3 weeks/12.0 ± 3.3 weeks in group 2; = 0.022/ = 0.034). Shoulder and elbow joint function evaluated by joint ROM and visual analogue scale (VAS), Korean Shoulder Elbow Society (KSS), American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES), and the University of California at Los Angeles (UCLA) scores was excellent in both groups. On the average shoulder ROM at 12 months after the operation, group 1 had forward elevation of 160°, external rotation of 30° in adduction and lumbar vertebra 10 level in internal rotation and group 2 had forward elevation of 170°, external rotation of 35° in adduction and lumbar vertebra 9 level in internal rotation. The mean VAS, KSS, ASES, and UCLA scores were 2.8, 87.0 ± 0.9, 89.4 ± 0.9, and 31.0 ± 1.4, respectively, in group 1 and 1.7, 89.1 ± 2.7, 91.0 ± 1.6, and 32.4 ± 3.2, respectively, in group 2. There were statistically significant intergroup differences in VAS score ( = 0.011). There were significantly less postoperative infections in group 2 (three cases, 10.7% in group 1 and 0 case in group 2; = 0.041) although all of them were superficial infections and well-treated by an average 4-week course of antibiotics (range, 2 to 6 weeks).
MIPO using a screw compression method in simple humeral shaft fractures demonstrated superior efficacy to ORIF in terms of the time to clinical/radiographic union, pain score, and postoperative infection rate.
本研究旨在比较切开复位内固定术(ORIF)与采用螺钉加压法的微创钢板接骨术(MIPO)治疗单纯肱骨干骨折的手术效果。
本回顾性研究纳入了50例因单纯肱骨干骨折接受手术治疗且于2008年8月至2015年6月在蔚山大学医院进行了至少12个月随访的患者。第1组包括23例接受ORIF治疗的患者,第2组包括27例采用锁定螺钉钢板的MIPO技术治疗的患者。评估临床/影像学愈合时间、关节活动范围(ROM)和功能。
第2组临床/影像学骨愈合的平均时间较短(第1组为12.0±3.7周/14.8±2.0周,第2组为9.4±1.3周/12.0±3.3周;P=0.022/P=0.034)。通过关节ROM和视觉模拟量表(VAS)、韩国肩肘协会(KSS)、美国肩肘外科医师协会(ASES)以及加利福尼亚大学洛杉矶分校(UCLA)评分评估的肩肘关节功能在两组中均为优良。术后12个月时,第1组平均肩部ROM为前屈160°、内收位外旋30°和内旋时第10腰椎水平,第2组为前屈170°、内收位外旋35°和内旋时第9腰椎水平。第1组的平均VAS、KSS、ASES和UCLA评分分别为2.8、87.0±0.9、89.4±0.9和31.0±1.4,第2组分别为1.7、89.1±2.7、91.0±1.6和32.4±3.2。VAS评分存在组间统计学显著差异(P=0.011)。第2组术后感染明显较少(第1组3例,10.7%,第2组0例;P=0.041),尽管所有感染均为表浅感染,平均通过4周(范围2至6周)的抗生素疗程得到良好治疗。
在单纯肱骨干骨折中,采用螺钉加压法的MIPO在临床/影像学愈合时间、疼痛评分和术后感染率方面显示出比ORIF更优的疗效。