Suppr超能文献

不同镇静方案对结肠镜检查中认知功能的影响。

Effect of Different Sedation Regimes on Cognitive Functions in Colonoscopy.

作者信息

Ekmekçi Perihan, Erkan Gulbanu, Yilmaz Hakan, K Kazbek Baturay, C Köksoy Ulku, Doganay Güler, Filiz Tüzüner Doganay

机构信息

Department of Anesthesiology and Reanimation, Ufuk University, Ankara, Turkey.

Department of Gastroenterology, Anesthesiology and Reanimation, Ufuk University, Ankara, Turkey.

出版信息

Euroasian J Hepatogastroenterol. 2017 Jul-Dec;7(2):158-162. doi: 10.5005/jp-journals-10018-1239. Epub 2017 Sep 29.

Abstract

AIM

To compare the effects of propofol/remifentanil and meperidine/midazolam on postprocedure cognitive function.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A total of 100 American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) score I to III patients undergoing elective colonoscopy were taken into the study and divided into two groups. Exclusion criteria were patient refusal, mini mental test (MMT) <26, The Amsterdam Preoperative Anxiety and Information Scale (APAIS) >10, advanced cardiopulmonary or psychiatric disease, chronic alcohol abuse, morbid obesity, and known allergy to study drugs. In group MM, 2 mg midazolam and 20 mg meperidine was given intravenously and additional 1 to 2 mg midazolam and 20 mg meperidine (with a maximum total of 5 mg midazolam and 50 mg meperidine) was given when bispectral index (BIS) was >80. In group RP, 100 μg/kg/minute propofol infusion and 1 μg/kg remifentanil bolus was administered and additional 0.5 μg/kg remifentanil bolus was given when BIS was >80. Observer's Assessment of Alertness/Sedation scale (OAA/S) and Facial Pain Score (FPS) values were recorded. Cognitive function was measured by Trieger Dot Test (TDT) and Digit Symbol Substitution Test (DSST).

RESULTS

The study was concluded with 100 patients. Heart rate was slower and BIS values were lower in group RP throughout the procedure. Blood pressure was lower in group RP without clinical significance. There was no difference concerning recovery time and visual analog scores (VASs). In group MM, TDT scores were higher and DSST scores were lower. Satisfaction was higher in group RP.

CONCLUSION

Propofol/remifentanil combination is better than meperidine/midazolam combination concerning cognitive function in sedation for colonoscopy.

CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE

The addition of BIS monitorization to evaluate the depth of sedation and the negative effects of midazolam meperidine combination on postprocedural cognitive function. Ekmekci P, Erkan G, Yilmaz H, Kazbek BK, Koksoy UC, Doganay G, Tüzüner F. Effect of Different Sedation Regimes on Cognitive Functions in Colonoscopy. Euroasian J Hepato-Gastroenterol 2017;7(2):158-162.

摘要

目的

比较丙泊酚/瑞芬太尼与哌替啶/咪达唑仑对术后认知功能的影响。

材料与方法

选取100例美国麻醉医师协会(ASA)评分I至III级行择期结肠镜检查的患者纳入研究并分为两组。排除标准为患者拒绝、简易精神状态检查(MMT)<26分、阿姆斯特丹术前焦虑与信息量表(APAIS)>10分、严重心肺或精神疾病、慢性酒精滥用、病态肥胖以及已知对研究药物过敏。在MM组中静脉给予2mg咪达唑仑和20mg哌替啶,当脑电双频指数(BIS)>80时追加1至2mg咪达唑仑和20mg哌替啶(咪达唑仑总量最大5mg,哌替啶总量最大50mg)。在RP组中,输注100μg/(kg·分钟)丙泊酚并静脉推注1μg/kg瑞芬太尼,当BIS>80时追加0.5μg/kg瑞芬太尼静脉推注。记录观察者警觉/镇静评分(OAA/S)和面部疼痛评分(FPS)值。通过特里尔 dot 试验(TDT)和数字符号替换试验(DSST)测量认知功能。

结果

该研究纳入100例患者后结束。在整个过程中,RP组心率较慢,BIS值较低。RP组血压较低,但无临床意义。恢复时间和视觉模拟评分(VAS)方面无差异。在MM组中,TDT评分较高,DSST评分较低。RP组满意度较高。

结论

在结肠镜检查镇静中,丙泊酚/瑞芬太尼组合在认知功能方面优于哌替啶/咪达唑仑组合。

临床意义

增加BIS监测以评估镇静深度以及咪达唑仑-哌替啶组合对术后认知功能的负面影响。埃克梅克奇P,埃尔坎G,伊尔马兹H,卡兹别克BK,科科索伊UC,多加纳伊G,图祖纳F。不同镇静方案对结肠镜检查中认知功能的影响。《欧亚肝脏胃肠病学杂志》2017;7(2):158 - 162。

相似文献

1
Effect of Different Sedation Regimes on Cognitive Functions in Colonoscopy.不同镇静方案对结肠镜检查中认知功能的影响。
Euroasian J Hepatogastroenterol. 2017 Jul-Dec;7(2):158-162. doi: 10.5005/jp-journals-10018-1239. Epub 2017 Sep 29.

引用本文的文献

本文引用的文献

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验