Suppr超能文献

体外冲击波疗法与关节腔内注射透明质酸治疗膝关节骨关节炎的疗效比较

Effect of Extracorporeal Shockwave Therapy Versus Intra-articular Injections of Hyaluronic Acid for the Treatment of Knee Osteoarthritis.

作者信息

Lee June-Kyung, Lee Bong-Yeon, Shin Woo-Yong, An Min-Ji, Jung Kwang-Ik, Yoon Seo-Ra

机构信息

Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Gwangju Veterans Hospital, Gwangju, Korea.

出版信息

Ann Rehabil Med. 2017 Oct;41(5):828-835. doi: 10.5535/arm.2017.41.5.828. Epub 2017 Oct 31.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate and compare the effects and outcomes of extracorporeal shock wave therapy (ESWT) and intra-articular injections of hyaluronic acid (HA) in patients with knee osteoarthritis (OA).

METHODS

Of the 78 patients recruited for the study, 61 patients met the inclusion criteria. The enrolled patients were randomly divided into two groups: the ESWT group and the HA group. The ESWT group underwent 3 sessions of 1,000 shockwave pulses performed on the affected knee with the dosage adjusted to 0.05 mJ/mm energy. The HA group was administered intra-articular HA once a week for 3 weeks with a 1-week interval between each treatment. The results were measured with the visual analogue scale (VAS), Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC), Lequesne index, 40-m fast-paced walk test, and stair-climb test (SCT). A baseline for each test was measured before treatment and then the effects of the treatments were measured by each test at 1 and 3 months after treatment.

RESULTS

In both groups, the scores of the VAS, WOMAC, Lequesne index, 40-m fast-paced walk test, and SCT were significantly improved in a time-dependent manner (p<0.01). There were no statistically significant differences measured at 1 and 3 months after treatment between the two groups (p>0.05).

CONCLUSION

The ESWT can be an alternative treatment to reduce pain and improve physical functions in patients with knee OA.

摘要

目的

评估和比较体外冲击波疗法(ESWT)和关节内注射透明质酸(HA)对膝骨关节炎(OA)患者的疗效和结果。

方法

在招募的78例研究患者中,61例符合纳入标准。入选患者被随机分为两组:ESWT组和HA组。ESWT组对患膝进行3次治疗,每次1000次冲击波脉冲,剂量调整为0.05 mJ/mm能量。HA组每周进行1次关节内注射HA,共3周,每次治疗间隔1周。采用视觉模拟量表(VAS)、西安大略和麦克马斯特大学骨关节炎指数(WOMAC)、勒凯斯内指数、40米快速步行试验和爬楼梯试验(SCT)进行评估。在治疗前测量每个测试的基线,然后在治疗后1个月和3个月通过每个测试测量治疗效果。

结果

两组患者的VAS、WOMAC、勒凯斯内指数、40米快速步行试验和SCT评分均随时间显著改善(p<0.01)。治疗后1个月和3个月两组间差异无统计学意义(p>0.05)。

结论

ESWT可作为减轻膝OA患者疼痛和改善身体功能的替代治疗方法。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9107/5698670/a84c10be31b3/arm-41-828-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验