Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Mustafa Kemal University Medical School, Hatay, Turkey.
Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Fizikon Medical Center, Konya, Turkey.
Int Orthop. 2020 Jul;44(7):1311-1319. doi: 10.1007/s00264-020-04541-w. Epub 2020 Mar 26.
This study aims to compare the efficacy of r-ESWT treatment with sham-ESWT on pain, walking speed, physical function, and isokinetic muscle strength in knee osteoarthritis.
The study included 104 patients (mean age 61.0 ± 6.2 years; range 50 to 70 years) who were admitted to our outpatient clinic with newly diagnosed with knee osteoarthritis. Patients were randomly assigned to two groups. Both groups received transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation for 30 minutes, hot pack for 40 minutes, and home-based exercise program of around the knee strengthening for 30 minutes in a day for three weeks (5 days in a week). Also, one group was treated with r-ESWT, while the other group was treated with sham-ESWT. For r-ESWT, patients received 2000 pulses of shockwave at 2.0 to 3.0 bar weekly for three weeks. All patients were evaluated with visual analog scale (VAS), active knee range of motion (ROM), 20-metre walk test, Western Ontario and McMaster Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC), Lequesne's disability index, and isokinetic muscle performance before treatment, at the end of treatment, at one month and three months after treatment.
When groups were compared, group 1 scores were significantly better than the group 2 in all outcome parameters except WOMAC-stiffness at the end of treatment, at one month and three month follow-up (all p < 0.05). The VAS-resting, VAS-movement, knee ROM, 20-m walk test, WOMAC, and Lequesne's disability scores and peak torque values of knee extension improved in both groups with the highest improvement in the r-ESWT group. A comparison of difference of the two group scores showed statistically significant superior improvement in group 1 in all parameters at both one month and three months.
Our findings revealed that r-ESWT combined with conventional electrotherapy is an effective treatment for improving pain and physical function in knee osteoarthritis to control symptoms up to three months.
NCT04243135.
本研究旨在比较 r-ESWT 治疗与 sham-ESWT 治疗对膝骨关节炎疼痛、行走速度、身体功能和等速肌肉力量的疗效。
本研究纳入了 104 名(平均年龄 61.0±6.2 岁;范围 50 至 70 岁)新诊断为膝骨关节炎的门诊患者。患者被随机分为两组。两组均接受经皮神经电刺激 30 分钟、热包 40 分钟和家庭为基础的膝关节强化运动 30 分钟,每周 5 天,共 3 周。同时,一组接受 r-ESWT 治疗,另一组接受 sham-ESWT 治疗。对于 r-ESWT,患者每周接受 2000 次冲击波治疗,强度为 2.0 至 3.0 巴,共 3 周。所有患者在治疗前、治疗结束时、治疗后 1 个月和 3 个月时均采用视觉模拟评分(VAS)、主动膝关节活动度(ROM)、20 米步行试验、西安大略和麦克马斯特骨关节炎指数(WOMAC)、Lequesne 残疾指数和等速肌肉性能进行评估。
当两组进行比较时,治疗结束时、治疗后 1 个月和 3 个月,组 1 的评分在所有结局参数上均明显优于组 2,除了 WOMAC 僵硬(p<0.05)。VAS 休息时、VAS 运动时、膝关节 ROM、20 米步行试验、WOMAC 和 Lequesne 残疾评分以及膝关节伸展的峰值扭矩值在两组中均有所改善,其中 r-ESWT 组的改善程度最高。两组评分差异的比较显示,治疗后 1 个月和 3 个月,组 1 在所有参数上的改善程度均具有统计学意义。
我们的研究结果表明,r-ESWT 联合常规电疗是一种有效治疗膝骨关节炎的方法,可在 3 个月内控制症状,改善疼痛和身体功能。
NCT04243135。