• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

通过研究、政策和实践应对暴力问题。

Taking action on violence through research, policy, and practice.

作者信息

Hyman Ilene, Vahabi Mandana, Bailey Annette, Patel Sejal, Guruge Sepali, Wilson-Mitchell Karline, Wong Josephine Pui-Hing

机构信息

Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.

Daphne Cockwell School of Nursing, Toronto, Canada.

出版信息

Glob Health Res Policy. 2016 Jul 15;1:6. doi: 10.1186/s41256-016-0006-7. eCollection 2016.

DOI:10.1186/s41256-016-0006-7
PMID:29202056
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5675061/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Violence is a critical public health problem associated with compromised health and social suffering that are preventable. The Centre for Global Health and Health Equity organized a forum in 2014 to identify: (1) priority issues related to violence affecting different population groups in Canada, and (2) strategies to take action on priority issues to reduce violence-related health inequities in Canada. In this paper, we present findings from the roundtable discussions held at the Forum, offer insights on the socio-political implications of these findings, and provide recommendations for action to reduce violence through research, policy and practice.

METHODS

Over 60 academic researchers, health and social service agency staff, community advocates and graduate students attended the daylong Forum, which included presentations on structural violence, community violence, gender-based violence, and violence against marginalized groups. Detailed notes taken at the roundtables were analyzed by the first author using a thematic analysis technique.

FINDINGS

The thematic analysis identified four thematic areas: 1) structural violence perpetuates interpersonal violence - the historical, social, political and economic marginalization that contributes to personal and community violence. 2) social norms of gender-based violence-the role of dominant social norms in perpetuating the practice of violence, especially towards women, children and older adults; 3) violence prevention and mitigation programs-the need for policy and programming to address violence at the individual/interpersonal, community, and societal levels; and 4) research gaps-the need for comprehensive research evidence made up of systematic reviews, community-based intervention and evaluation of implementation research to identify effective programming to address violence.

CONCLUSIONS

The proceedings from the Global Health and Health Equity Forum underscored the importance of recognizing violence as a public health issue that requires immediate and meaningful communal and structural investment to break its historic cycles. Based on our thematic analysis and literature review, four recommendations are offered: (1) Support and adopt policies to prevent or reduce structural violence; (2) Adopt multi-pronged strategies to transform dominant social norms associated with violence; (3) Establish standards and ensure adequate funding for violence prevention programs and services; and (4) Fund higher level ecological research on violence prevention and mitigation.

摘要

背景

暴力是一个严重的公共卫生问题,会导致健康受损和社会痛苦,而这些都是可以预防的。全球卫生与健康公平中心于2014年组织了一次论坛,以确定:(1)与影响加拿大不同人群的暴力相关的优先问题,以及(2)针对优先问题采取行动以减少加拿大与暴力相关的健康不平等的策略。在本文中,我们展示了在该论坛上举行的圆桌讨论的结果,对这些结果的社会政治影响提供见解,并为通过研究、政策和实践减少暴力的行动提供建议。

方法

60多名学术研究人员、卫生和社会服务机构工作人员、社区倡导者和研究生参加了为期一天的论坛,其中包括关于结构性暴力、社区暴力、基于性别的暴力以及针对边缘化群体的暴力的演讲。第一作者使用主题分析技术对圆桌会议上的详细笔记进行了分析。

结果

主题分析确定了四个主题领域:1)结构性暴力使人际暴力长期存在——历史、社会、政治和经济边缘化导致个人和社区暴力。2)基于性别的暴力的社会规范——占主导地位的社会规范在使暴力行为长期存在方面所起的作用,特别是对妇女、儿童和老年人的暴力;3)暴力预防和缓解计划——需要政策和计划来解决个人/人际、社区和社会层面的暴力问题;4)研究差距——需要由系统评价、基于社区的干预以及实施研究的评估组成的全面研究证据,以确定解决暴力问题的有效计划。

结论

全球卫生与健康公平论坛的会议记录强调了将暴力视为一个公共卫生问题的重要性,这需要立即进行有意义的社区和结构性投资,以打破其历史循环。基于我们的主题分析和文献综述,提出了四项建议:(1)支持并采用预防或减少结构性暴力的政策;(2)采取多管齐下的策略来改变与暴力相关的占主导地位的社会规范;(3)为暴力预防计划和服务制定标准并确保充足的资金;(4)资助关于暴力预防和缓解的更高级别的生态研究。

相似文献

1
Taking action on violence through research, policy, and practice.通过研究、政策和实践应对暴力问题。
Glob Health Res Policy. 2016 Jul 15;1:6. doi: 10.1186/s41256-016-0006-7. eCollection 2016.
2
Recommendations for Canada's National Action Plan to End Gender-Based Violence: perspectives from leaders, service providers and survivors in Canada's largest city during the COVID-19 pandemic.加拿大国家行动计划以结束基于性别的暴力行为:来自加拿大最大城市在 COVID-19 大流行期间的领导人、服务提供商和幸存者的观点。
Health Promot Chronic Dis Prev Can. 2023 Apr 12;43(4):155-170. doi: 10.24095/hpcdp.43.4.01. Epub 2023 Jan 18.
3
A community-based qualitative study on the experience and understandings of intimate partner violence and HIV vulnerability from the perspectives of female sex workers and male intimate partners in North Karnataka state, India.一项基于社区的定性研究,探讨印度北卡纳塔克邦女性性工作者及其男性亲密伴侣对亲密伴侣暴力和艾滋病毒易感性的经历与理解。
BMC Womens Health. 2018 May 11;18(1):66. doi: 10.1186/s12905-018-0554-8.
4
The future of Cochrane Neonatal.考克兰新生儿协作网的未来。
Early Hum Dev. 2020 Nov;150:105191. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2020.105191. Epub 2020 Sep 12.
5
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
6
Beyond the black stump: rapid reviews of health research issues affecting regional, rural and remote Australia.超越黑木树:影响澳大利亚地区、农村和偏远地区的健康研究问题的快速综述。
Med J Aust. 2020 Dec;213 Suppl 11:S3-S32.e1. doi: 10.5694/mja2.50881.
7
A social-ecological examination into the research, policy and health service delivery environment related to early marriage and sexual and gender-based violence among youth in Jordan.对约旦青年早婚以及性与性别暴力问题的相关研究、政策和卫生服务提供环境进行的社会生态学考察。
BMC Int Health Hum Rights. 2020 Jul 13;20(1):16. doi: 10.1186/s12914-020-00234-y.
8
NIH State-of-the-Science Conference Statement on preventing violence and related health-risking social behaviors in adolescents.美国国立卫生研究院关于预防青少年暴力及相关危害健康的社会行为的科学现状会议声明。
NIH Consens State Sci Statements. 2004;21(2):1-34.
9
Pathways to Civic Engagement Among Urban Youth of Color.城市有色人种青年的公民参与途径。
Monogr Soc Res Child Dev. 2020 Jun;85(2):7-154. doi: 10.1111/mono.12415.
10
The Minderoo-Monaco Commission on Plastics and Human Health.美诺集团-摩纳哥基金会塑料与人体健康委员会
Ann Glob Health. 2023 Mar 21;89(1):23. doi: 10.5334/aogh.4056. eCollection 2023.

引用本文的文献

1
From Tragedy To Opportunity: Hospital-based Violence Intervention Programs May Address Root-Cause Health Disparities for Violent Traumatic Injury Patients.从悲剧到机遇:基于医院的暴力干预项目可能解决暴力创伤患者的根本健康差异问题。
J Prim Care Community Health. 2025 Jan-Dec;16:21501319251356386. doi: 10.1177/21501319251356386. Epub 2025 Aug 11.
2
Mexican-origin parent and child reported neighborhood factors and youth substance use.有墨西哥血统的家长和孩子报告了邻里因素与青少年药物使用情况。
Front Psychiatry. 2023 Dec 1;14:1241002. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2023.1241002. eCollection 2023.
3
Does Structural Violence by Institutions Enable Revictimization and Lead to Poorer Health Outcomes?-A Public Health Viewpoint.机构结构性暴力是否会导致再次受害和健康状况恶化?——公共卫生视角。
Ann Glob Health. 2023 Sep 15;89(1):58. doi: 10.5334/aogh.4137. eCollection 2023.
4
Criminal Litigation of Workplace Violence in Chinese Hospitals and Legal Effort to Deescalate Crimes.中国医院工作场所暴力的刑事诉讼与犯罪降级的法律努力。
Inquiry. 2023 Jan-Dec;60:469580231153274. doi: 10.1177/00469580231153274.
5
Personal and Political: Post-Traumatic Stress Through the Lens of Social Identity, Power, and Politics.个人与政治:透过社会身份、权力和政治视角看创伤后应激障碍
Polit Psychol. 2021 Jun;42(3):501-533. doi: 10.1111/pops.12709. Epub 2020 Dec 13.
6
Different Crises, Different Patterns of Trauma. The Impact of a Social Crisis and the COVID-19 Health Pandemic on a High Violence Area.不同的危机,不同的创伤模式。社会危机和 COVID-19 健康大流行对高暴力地区的影响。
World J Surg. 2021 Jan;45(1):3-9. doi: 10.1007/s00268-020-05860-0. Epub 2020 Nov 13.
7
Identification of priorities for multidisciplinary intersectoral research on violence against older women.确定针对老年妇女暴力行为的多学科跨部门研究重点。
J Multidiscip Healthc. 2019 Feb 27;12:169-172. doi: 10.2147/JMDH.S194599. eCollection 2019.

本文引用的文献

1
Disrespect and abuse of women in childbirth: challenging the global quality and accountability agendas.分娩过程中对妇女的不尊重和虐待:挑战全球质量与问责议程。
Lancet. 2014 Sep 20;384(9948):e42-4. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(14)60859-X. Epub 2014 Jun 22.
2
Interprofessional collaboration, the only way to Save Every Woman and Every Child.跨专业协作,拯救每一位妇女和儿童的唯一途径。
Lancet. 2014 Sep 20;384(9948):e41-2. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(14)60858-8. Epub 2014 Jun 22.
3
A systematic review of interventions for preventing adolescent intimate partner violence.干预措施预防青少年亲密伴侣暴力的系统评价。
J Adolesc Health. 2014 Jan;54(1):3-13. doi: 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2013.08.008. Epub 2013 Oct 11.
4
The neglect of child neglect: a meta-analytic review of the prevalence of neglect.忽视儿童忽视:忽视发生率的元分析综述。
Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol. 2013 Mar;48(3):345-55. doi: 10.1007/s00127-012-0549-y. Epub 2012 Jul 15.
5
Global health and the global economic crisis.全球卫生与全球经济危机。
Am J Public Health. 2011 Apr;101(4):646-53. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2009.188458. Epub 2011 Feb 17.
6
Lived experience of economic and political trends related to globalization.与全球化相关的经济和政治趋势的生活体验。
Can J Public Health. 2010 Jan-Feb;101(1):92-5. doi: 10.1007/BF03405571.
7
Advocacy interventions to reduce or eliminate violence and promote the physical and psychosocial well-being of women who experience intimate partner abuse.倡导采取干预措施,以减少或消除暴力行为,并促进遭受亲密伴侣虐待的妇女的身心健康和社会心理福祉。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2009 Jul 8(3):CD005043. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD005043.pub2.
8
Aboriginal suicidal behaviour research: from risk factors to culturally-sensitive interventions.原住民自杀行为研究:从风险因素到文化敏感型干预措施。
J Can Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2006 Nov;15(4):159-67.
9
The prevalence of elder abuse and neglect: a systematic review.老年人虐待与忽视的患病率:一项系统综述。
Age Ageing. 2008 Mar;37(2):151-60. doi: 10.1093/ageing/afm194.
10
Identifying opinion leaders to promote behavior change.识别意见领袖以促进行为改变。
Health Educ Behav. 2007 Dec;34(6):881-96. doi: 10.1177/1090198106297855. Epub 2007 Jun 29.