援助效果与项目成效：一个针对特定卫生系统中不同援助干预措施进行比较评估的框架建议
Aid effectiveness and programmatic effectiveness: a proposed framework for comparative evaluation of different aid interventions in a particular health system.
作者信息
Haque Hasibul, Hill Philip C, Gauld Robin
机构信息
Department of Preventive and Social Medicine, Dunedin School of Medicine, University of Otago, Dunedin, 9016 New Zealand.
Centre for International Health, University of Otago, Dunedin, 9016 New Zealand.
出版信息
Glob Health Res Policy. 2017 Apr 3;2:7. doi: 10.1186/s41256-017-0029-8. eCollection 2017.
BACKGROUND
Against a backdrop of changing concepts of aid effectiveness, development effectiveness, health systems strengthening, and increasing emphasis on impact evaluation, this article proposes a theory-driven impact evaluation framework to gauge the effect of aid effectiveness principles on programmatic outcomes of different aid funded programs in the health sector of a particular country.
METHODS
The foundation and step-by-step process of implementing the framework are described.
RESULTS
With empirical evidence from the field, the steps involve analysis of context, program designs, implementation mechanisms, outcomes, synthesis, and interpretation of findings through the programs' underlying program theories and interactions with the state context and health system.
CONCLUSIONS
The framework can be useful for comparatively evaluating different aid interventions both in fragile and non-fragile state contexts.
背景
在援助有效性、发展有效性、卫生系统加强等概念不断变化以及对影响评估日益重视的背景下，本文提出了一个理论驱动的影响评估框架，以衡量援助有效性原则对某一特定国家卫生部门不同援助资助项目的方案成果的影响。
方法
描述了实施该框架的基础和逐步过程。
结果
基于该领域的实证证据，这些步骤包括通过项目的基础项目理论以及与国家背景和卫生系统的相互作用来分析背景、项目设计、实施机制、成果、综合以及对研究结果的解读。
结论
该框架对于在脆弱和非脆弱国家背景下比较评估不同的援助干预措施可能有用。
Zotero 插件